ipl-logo

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Pitbulls

449 Words2 Pages

There are pros and cons for breed specific legislation (BSL) for pitbulls. The BSL is a term for controlling what breeds of dogs get restrictions. Society automatically claims that pitbulls are bad dogs and should not be owned. However,there are pros and cons to this statement, pitbulls should not have a restriction. Where do you stand on this argument?
According to pro con.org, another con states about how the BSL does not make the community safer just by restricting pitbulls. The counterargument to this states how the BSL does make the community safer before the dog bite can happen. However, in reality we can see that any dog breed can bite someone and injure them not just pitbulls, it does not seem fair that pitbulls have this regulation when other dogs can also injure someone. As stated in pro con.org, one of the pro’s states that the BSL is there to …show more content…

The counterargument of this is that pitbulls are not aggressive just from dog fighting it is also the way the owners raise the dog breed, you could personally raise another dog breed besides a pitbull and they could lash out as well and be into dog fighting also, why should we blame the pitbulls. A pro stated from pro con says that pitbulls have the automatic nature to be aggressive and bite people. This is not true at all; there are very nice pitbulls out there who are not aggressive or bite at all. The counterargument to this statement is that, Pitbulls are not aggressive or dangerous they are just like and other dog breed if they are raised incorrectly or get raised into dog fighting they will be aggressive, but if you raise them properly and don't dog fight they are the most gentle breed of dogs out there. Some questions you may be asking could be, Should places have this pitbull restriction? The answer to this question is no, we

Show More
Related
444 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, pit bulls aren't such dangerous dogs after all. Pit bulls have somewhat of a damage to history. There's reasons behind that though so people can judge pit bulls for being the "bully breed" but they're really not. We can fix the way people think by showing them how pit bulls can be "mean"and how they

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

Don’t always judge a book by its cover. People often go into defence mode when they see a pitbull. They are not as violent or aggressive as generally thought. Often pitbulls are aggressive because the owner makes the dog that way. Sadly pit bulls started getting the bad stereotype “bad dog” due to people training them to be aggressive.

Read More
335 Words | 2 Pages

Why pitbulls should be allowed all through colorado I believe that colorado should let pitbulls all through colorado. I believe this because nowadays pit bulls are very misunderstood than dangerous. I mainly believe this because the reason for aggression is because of being a bad owner and sometimes abuse, because most of the time if you raise a dog to fight and be aggressive they will definitely be aggressive. And this is with any dog. Statistics show that a pitbull is one of the last dogs if you were going to approach them aggressively and non-aggressively.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Within the whole dog populace, 6% are that of pit bulls. Whilst they are originally bred as bully dogs, pit bulls transcended the notion and become more welcoming to human care. By the early 1900s, pit bulls are dubbed to be 'nanny dogs ' due to their caring and affectionate nature towards children and the elderly. And one unnoticed truth about dog attacks and pit bulls is that breeds aren’t really a factor if a dog would bite deep or not. The breed isn 't really accepted to be an essential factor in dog attacks, and so the misconception about pit bulls being a crazed dog breed isn 't really factual.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Pit bulls are one of the most stereotyped breeds of dogs in today’s society. Many of the dogs found in shelters are in fact members of the pit bull breed. However, adding breed specific legislation to areas with issues involving the breed will not solve the issues but as a matter of fact make the issues worse and create new ones. As a pit bull owner myself, I know banning the breed will not solve the problem and will only cause suffering to all involved. Breed specific legislation is a series of laws that are used to regulate or ban certain breeds of dogs.

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

Pitbulls are very helpful in many way 's. They are very ardent. If you train them right they accept very well. Pitbulls have attacked people. It 's not their blunder when they attack.

Read More
152 Words | 1 Pages

I am for Pitbulls being allowed as pets because if their is a fight that involves a dog and don’t know the breed they often say or mistake it as a Pitbull. “The Media and the Pitbull” I am for Pitbulls because they are good guard dogs. Before Civil War

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Consequently, there are proven facts and instances where BSL has actually not done anything at all but kill and outlaw a breed of dog. I honestly think that it is amazing that BSL is still even an option to obtaining stronger public safety, mainly because of

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

Not all pitbulls are mean and will attack you, it’s the people who make the pit-bulls attack and train them to be mean. Pit-bulls are good dogs people just think that they are bloodthirsty beasts and people should not keep them as pets. They can be trained to be good pets and it is the owners faults if the pit-bulls attack you or if they are mean. They are good pets to have and I feel that people should be able to keep them as pets. If people were not

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Pitbulls give benefits to many people of different kinds such as”Therapy and service dogs, agility champions, search & rescue dogs, and even military heroes.” Even though harsh stereotypes seek pitbulls out to be Dangerous and aggressive they can be used for many important tasks that help people and our society. All in all it is clear that pitbulls have been unfairly treated. Pitbull bans are unfair because the dogs are not as aggressive as everyone claims they are.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

There is no evidence that pitbull bans make communities safer. “In 1990, Winnipeg,Canada, pitbulls were banned, which actually increased the number of dog bites, however rottweiler bites went up immediately.” In 2000 when they changed this law, all dog bites decreased. This proves that the pitbulls were not actually the ones that were attacking,

Read More
1191 Words | 5 Pages

Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL) is a law that bans or restricts certain types of dogs based on their appearance, usually because they are perceived as “dangerous” breeds or types of dogs. BSL has targeted pit bulls for many years trying to ban them and will not address the fact that a dog of any breed can become dangerous when bred or trained to be aggressive. Some states have actually enacted BSL specifically to the owners of pit bulls in Denver (Pit). To this day, Denver still has the law, however, it continues to have significantly higher dog bite-related hospitalization rates than other counties (Pit). Ironic, right?

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Many cities have banned pit bull breeds believing them to be vicious/ dangerous breeds one city that city that has done so is Miami, according to Warnes “pit bulls have a reputation for aggression and many municipalities have ordinances either forbidding pit bull ownership outright or imposing restriction on ownership” (Salem Press Encyclopedia). Many pit bulls have ended up in shelters facing the possibility of euthanasia. Dogs identified as Pit bulls are amongst the highest breeds to get euthanized across the United States.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

More than likely the people that get this type of dog would just train a different breed of dog such as german shepherds to do the same thing therefore, “banning pit bulls would make no progress”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned. “If it was determined that pit bulls were 5 times more likely to attack than any other dogs, that could mean that 5 out of 1 million pit bulls will attack in their lifetime instead of 1 out of 1 million. The point is the evidence that shows pit bulls are more likely to attack than other dogs is misinterpreted to mean that they are likely to attack”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

However BSL is just a quick fix and the dangerous dogs can't be remedied quickly. In all reality BSL should be called breed discrimination laws. There are two types of BSL bans, and owner regulations. Bans make it illegal to house, harbor, import, train, or breed the specific dog breed that has been banned. Ownership regulations don't outright ban the breed but rather makes it extremely difficult to own a pit bull.

Read More

More about What Are The Pros And Cons Of Pitbulls

Related Topics

Open Document