A Call for a Single Payer Universal Health Care System As the 2016 Presidential Elections draw near, the topic of much debate is that of healthcare. Some candidates vow for universal healthcare and mandate health insurance for all, while others believe that tax credits and health savings accounts will resolve the current crisis. Consequently, the nation has been divided on which plan to support and move forward with. Some fear universal health care will diminish the quality of care and lead to long waits, while others fear that health savings accounts and tax credits won’t be enough to insure all and will do little to diminish the administrative costs of the current system. Ultimately because healthcare is a basic right that should be guaranteed
Developed countries around the world have embraced the universal healthcare, with America being the only exception. Access to healthcare is considered one of the most important things for the progress of a country. However, many people in America consider that the healthcare system in the country is quite inefficient. It is estimated that more than 45 million Americans have no medical insurance.
The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
However, some might say that the benefits outweigh the odds as more people will be able to have better health care so it is benefiting humanity. But, Universal Healthcare should not happen. If Universal Healthcare happens, how would the government pay for it?
The current debate concerning the implementation of universal healthcare in America is hard to understand because it is comprised most of practical arguments of concern for the motives behind the project. Before one asks how much it will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, they should ask whether implementing universal healthcare is best for keeping with the values and principles of the American way. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
The question of universal healthcare is a source of heated controversy, with discussions centered on ethics, societal well-being, and economic factors. We investigate universal healthcare's potential to enhance access, promote a healthier population, and lower financial barriers. My position on this issue is unequivocally in support of universal healthcare, motivated by the notion that access to basic medical services is a fundamental right. While noting opposing opinions, which frequently center on concerns such as tax burdens and probable wait periods, this essay seeks to provide a thorough examination of the ethical, logical, and emotional components of universal healthcare. This allows us to better grasp the benefits and challenges of pursuing a healthcare
Why deny people care for their health? Overall the universal healthcare system would benefit the citizens of the United
Whether we as the country of the United States Of America should have a universal healthcare system has been in discussion for years tn the government. I personally believe this would be an excellent idea as long as everyone was required to pay for this health care and no one was excluded. This would cause a lower rate for healthcare as well as less confusion about multiple forms for your doctors office or hospital. There would also be less hassle about looking for the “correct health care system”. I personally think that if there was no monopoly because of regulation and laws keeping this healthcare system from becoming a monopoly then this system would be perfect.
Every man, woman and child in our country should be able to access the health care they need regardless of their income. We need a system that works not just for millionaires and billionaires, but for all of us. But for those people who can afford their own health insurance they can choose a variety of health insurance plans that fit their budget and have different levels of coverage depending on their needs. The size of your family doesn't necessarily determine what you spend on doctors and prescriptions. A healthy family of six could spend less than a family of 2 with chronic conditions.
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
Universal healthcare could solve a lot of our problems in the United States. If universal healthcare existed in America, the millions of uncovered would finally have coverage. “In France, the system is largely financed by government health care insurance.” (Bourne, 2014). The residents have a tax come out of their paychecks, which funds the coverage.
Health care is essential for Americans despite pre-existing conditions, and a free market insurance program would allow citizens to received the health care that is so desperately needed. A universal health care system is a matter of human rights and would solve America’s problem of one sixth of the population being
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
As powerful as the United States is there should be universal healthcare for all of the citizens regardless of their economic background. The Affordable Care Act put into place by President Barack Obama is one step closer to helping achieve universal health care (King). United States Citizens should be required to have health insurance to help eliminate some of the debt that citizens have
