ipl-logo

What Does It Mean To Say That People Should Speak Freely On Social Media

486 Words2 Pages

There is no question that free speech issued from social media platforms have spurred controversy. Many believe that people shouldn’t have the opportunity to speak freely via their social accounts. While others believe that goes against people’s constitutional rights and people deserve to speak freely. I happen to agree solemnly with the people against limiting their constitutional rights of free speech. As the 1st amendment grants every citizen the right to speak their mind, social media outlets count just as much and should not be prohibited. Twitter (a social media platform) serves as a global center where anyone with internet access can make an account and begin channeling their thoughts as tweets. Out of all the other social media platforms, …show more content…

Twitter does a fine job of creating that outlet for us to exercise that right. While I do agree that people should speak freely on social media, I do believe that just like our laws, there should be limits to how a person speaks freely. There is a point to where one’s exercise of their right is limited. If a person is speaking in a way that severely impacts another person or community, then that is hate speech and not free speech. In my eyes, free speech is only when a person can say what they want if it doesn’t abundantly cause grieve for others. For example, a person can go on Twitter and tweet “LeBron James new shoes are super-duper ugly.” This tweet is a hasty critic, but it doesn’t affect anyone on a personal level. If someone one was to tweet something like “I hate LeBron James because he is a black…” then this would be considered hate speech because it displays a strong disapproval that would affect the directed person and others significantly. Now the great thing about Twitter and many other social media outlets is that they have policies to prohibit speech that is considered “hate” and not “free. “ In conclusion, social media platforms should not limit people from free speech because it would be unconstitutional. Rather restrict people from hate speech because the constitution does not abide to

Show More
Related

Westboro Baptist Church Soldier's Funerals Summary

1091 Words | 5 Pages

Whether laws intend to limit the offensive power of a minority or protect a minority from attacks, either way rights are lost. In the words of Roger Baldwin, founder of the civil liberties union, “In order to defend the people you like, you have to defend the people you hate.” Roger Baldwin’s statement indicates that if we limit the free speech of one group we ultimately limit our own freedoms. The first Amendment clearly states the limiting of any groups right is unconstitutional, “make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” The basis behind not allowing the government to define free speech allows Americans to create their own social order and among themselves determine what is acceptable.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Twitter Made Us Better By Sarah Jackson

839 Words | 4 Pages

Her insertion of her and her colleagues’ previous work was insufficient to make her a valid source to prove Twitter had any impact on making a better society. Jackson needed to include more ethos in her article to make it credible and to convince the reader that she is qualified to have an opinion and to comment on this

Read More

How Did The Alien And Sedition Acts Violate The Constitution

566 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment states that “Congress cannot enact laws limiting ”the freedom of speech or press.”’ (Kentucky Resolutions) Again, in short, this amendment is saying that the federal government is not able to pass a law that takes away someone’s right to speak their opinion. Contrary to this amendment, the Federal government did exactly the opposite of what the amendment said was allowed. The acts, passed by John Adams, take away the human right of speaking what is on the mind and using what they say to show them off as a threat.

Read More

What Is Daniel Manville Criminal Charge

612 Words | 3 Pages

Daniele Manville was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 4 ½ to 15 years incarceration. Daniele had decided at a very young age he wanted to work in law; he wanted to be a lawyer. In 1972 at a college campus he got into a heated scuffle and killed a guy with chloroform; the heated scuffle was over drugs. When Daniele was released in 1976 and thirteen years later applied to enrol to be a lawyer. When it came to one question ‘Have you ever been convicted of a criminal charge’ he answered appropriately to what he had done.

Read More

Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

770 Words | 4 Pages

Many people believe that the First Amendment gives the people right to say whatever they want but it’s not true. There is no hate speech exception to First Amendment. There are some kind of words which are not protected especially the fighting or insulting words or speech in which a person threatens to commit a crime that would result in death, serious injury, or damage is not protected by the First Amendment, instead First Amendment gives the right to fight against injustice, inequality and unfairness. For example Black Lives Matter movement, this movement has every right to express their feelings. The ways they are protesting are protected under the First Amendment.

Read More

Prosecuted For Statements Made On Social Media

447 Words | 2 Pages

However, It is important to note that while individuals have the right to free speech, this right is not absolute. Source 2 states, “... First amendment should be treated not as a right but as a privilege...” This means that even though we have freedom of speech, it doesn’t mean we should take advantage of that. Additionally, those who take advantage of freedom of speech should have consequences given to them.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

410 Words | 2 Pages

While having free speech can be a problem and anger many, it IS one of our basic freedoms. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution as the first ten amendments on December 15, 1791 and the fact that American’s rights were not protected and added to the Constitution any earlier heated up numerous debates! The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, press, religion, and petition. It is very well one of America’s special aspects and for some American’s, it is their most cherished personal freedoms. With that being said, I do not see a problem with one having the ability to speak their own opinion, I just think their should be a few limitations.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment

794 Words | 4 Pages

This has come up a lot with people like President Trump. If the government blocks people’s posts when they are sharing their political opinions, then they are violating that person’s First Amendment right. If the government has probable cause or a warrant to view someone’s social media, then they are lawfully allowed to do so. If they surveil internet activity until they find something to pin someone on, then they are not acting lawfully, no matter how disliked that person may be. The person who owns the social media account could block people if they are being rude, but the government does not have the authority to control what people

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

507 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. There are many ideas expressed in times where it would be inappropriate or unnecessary to use one’s freedom of speech. These circumstances would be where something is inappropriate or misidentified as hate speech. There are many situations where someone may want to say something, yet there are times where some things should not be said.

Read More

Differences Between The First Amendment And Social Media

54 Words | 1 Pages

Thank you Samantha! Yes first amendment is taken too far. There is a thin line that people have to consider when referring to the first amendment and social media is not the place to express everything. Businesses have to watch what they express on social media, especially about their opinions on the upcoming

Read More

Commerce Clause Essay

490 Words | 2 Pages

Free Speech is a human right and technically the only circumstance in which you do not have this right is if it is causing harm to others. Unfortunately, I would say the right to free speech depends on who you are, what you are saying and where you are saying it, I don’t feel this is fair, but it is reality. We all have different point of views and different ways of life and while we all have freedom of speech, so does everyone else. People who are willing to express how they feel need to be prepared for some form of retaliation because not everyone is going to see eye to eye and someone will have an opinion that is different from theirs, and will more than likely exercise their right to freedom of speech. C.

Read More

Hatred Of The First Amendment Essay

991 Words | 4 Pages

I remember vividly how much hate and arguments came about when I simply made a post about gun control on my social media. People automatically became defensive and misinterpreted my words into starting an argument that swept across Portland. People i’d never heard of/met came to my post either defending it or pointing out all the issues they had with it. If everybody gets freedom of speech, why are only some opinions listened

Read More

Should Hate Speech And Should It Be Protected Under The First Amendment?

285 Words | 2 Pages

Although hate speech is bigoted, hate-mongering, and can potentially lead to hate crimes, it should still be considered free speech. If citizens of the United States are not allowed to be verbal about their beliefs, whether or not they are offensive and hateful, then there is no use in allowing free speech. Placing limitations on free speech contradicts the First Amendment, therefore making it inaccurate and useless.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Freedom In The United States Today

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Our own country is basically threatening ourselves from the freedom of speech and should encourage everyone to express themselves without punishment. This is not necessarily an issue that can be resolved, but it needs to be made publicized and be made aware of. Too much of society are triggered by a simple few words they may come across when scrolling a timeline. Social media is an influential and high powered tool that’s forced a new lifestyle. We must make ourselves and others comfortable with expressing themselves while handling criticism to ensure protection of our freedom of

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

817 Words | 4 Pages

We can’t misuse the freedom of speech, saying words that can cause serious harm (bullying). This form of speech will cause depression, suicide, and stunted social development. When freedom of speech hurts others, then it is not just an opinion anymore; it is a form of hate

Read More

More about What Does It Mean To Say That People Should Speak Freely On Social Media

Related Topics

Open Document