What Is An Example Of An Opinio Created Survey

Example of an Opinio created survey. (Objectplanet. 2014)
Loneliness (To discover how lonely one feels)
Q. Do you often feel as though you are alone?
To discover whether the individual is alone often
Q. Would you say that you feel included in the group at social events? *
To discover whether the individual feels included
Q. In the last week, how often have you felt as though you had nobody to turn to?
To discover whether the person has anybody to support them
Q. I feel as though I have plenty of people to talk to. *
To discover whether the person has others to communicate with
Q. I have great difficulty in making new friends.
To discover whether the person has ability to make new friends
Facebook Usage (To discover the frequency and reasons

I have no interest in making comments or posting photos on Facebook interest groups. *
To determine whether the user needs to feel connected to the wider community, and those with common interests
Q. I update my Facebook status daily.
To determine whether the user relies on Facebook as a main source of connectivity to their friends, and openly shares information
Q. I withhold sharing my personal details with Facebook friends. *
To determine whether the user is willing to share more personal information on Facebook
Q. Do you feel alienated when you are unable to access Facebook?
To determine whether the user is dependent on Facebook
Interaction Style based on the big 5 personality traits (To discover whether there is an interaction between personality style and level of loneliness)
Q. When socializing, how often would you say you are the centre of attention?
To discover whether the individual is extraverted
Q. Do you share details about your life in general freely to other people?
To discover whether the individual displays the trait of openness
Q. I consider myself to be highly organized.
To discover whether the individual displays the trait of conscientiousness
Q. I am genuinely concerned for others

Items will be discarded if there is low item-total acquiescence correlations (r < 0.20) (Condon, Ferrando, & Demestre, 2006). The items retained will have the highest correlation of the sum of ratings (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg, & Pallesen, 2012). Criterion-related validity will be achieved by the utilisation of a factorial analysis. Records with any missing data will be excluded. To test convergent validity, between the FLS and UCLA loneliness scale researchers will examine the Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg, & Pallesen, 2012). A strong positive correlation of greater than 0.7 (Francis, 2013) between the two scales for each item will show high convergent validity (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg, & Pallesen, 2012). To test discriminant validity, researchers will assess this through the low correlation between the FLS and the UCLA loneliness scale (Tharayil, 2012). To test criterion-related validity, researchers will run a factorial analysis. Records with any missing data will be excluded. The items retained will have the highest correlation of the sum of ratings (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg, & Pallesen,