ipl-logo

What Is The Case Against Adnan Syed Case

886 Words4 Pages

Adnan Syed couldn’t have killed his former high school girlfriend, Hae Lee, 20 years ago: “I know it’s physically impossible for people to be in two places at one time.” Syed, the subject of Sarah Koenig’s hit podcast “Serial” and Amy Berg’s HBO docuseries “The Case Against Adnan Syed,” was convicted of killing Lee, his ex-girlfriend, in 1999. But McClain, who was never called to testify during the first trial, said she had a 20-minute conversation with Syed in their high school’s library at the same time prosecutors say Lee was murdered”.Another witness who testified to seeing Adnan was Rabia, She claims to have gone into the library and saw Adnan printing papers, they even managed to chat for a bit, As Koenig comments, “And she told me, that …show more content…

Either way they both support the fact that Adnan was not given an effective lawyer. Adnan also has no real motive for the murder. This is important because motive is a key factor in identifying a murder as it explains their intentions and gives a reasonable explanation on why they had committed the crime. The prosecution, not being able to give a convincing motive, raises doubt as to whether Adnan had a reason and if he really was responsible for the crime. The prosecution claims that Adnan killed Hae out of rage due to their breakup, however there is no real evidence to support this. When asking multiple eyewitnesses who both knew Adnan and Hae they claim that there was no unusual behavior hinting that Adnan was looking to get revenge on Hae,instead most of them claim that Adnan did not seem like the type of person to commit nprofessional at times, and failed to give important pieces of information that could have been crucial in Adnan’s favor which led to many people believing the case was botched. Based on the evidence there is room for reasonable doubt in Adnan’s conviction as it is hard to paint Adnan to be responsible for the murder of Hae. There is not enough evidence against him and should not have been punished for the murder of Hae. While it may

Show More
Related
991 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction: I am going to discuss with you why I believe the case against Adnan Syed for the murder and kidnapping of Hae Min Lee should be reopened within the court. I have reasoning behind Asia McClain and her proposed alibi for Adnan and with a DNA test found linking a former serial killer/rapist, Ronald Lee Moore. I will be discussing the credibility behind Asia's letters and affidavits and how Adnan is innocent and should have a fair trial. I will also discuss why I believe Jay's statements on the day do not all match up as he tells different stories.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

One of these friends was Adnan Syed, her ex-boyfriend and another popular kid. He was arrested and charged for her murder based on witness testimony from a distant friend, Jay Wilds. 15 years later, Sarah Koenig revisited the case to present in her podcast, Serial uncovering lots of evidence along the way. The evidence she finds both supports and opposes his guilty sentence but ultimately, the strongest evidence points to Syed being guilty, due to his weak alibi and the strength of the evidence opposing him.

Read More
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Aiden Livingston English III Mrs. Duncan 11 Mar 2024 The Case of Adnan Syed People are wrongly convicted due to poor police work every single day. “975 innocent people are being locked up every year” (Home). In 1999, Haemin Lee, a senior at Woodlawn High School, was brutally strangled in her own car. The person accused of the act was Adnan Syed, a 17-year-old who also attended Woodlawn High. One of Adnan’s close friends, Rabia Chaudry, sent Sarah Koenig a letter trying to convince Sarah of Adnan’s innocence.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

January 13th, 1999 a 17-year-old girl named Hae is manually strangled, to death. Six weeks later Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, is convinced of the murder. He is given a life sentence, plus thirty years, for his crime. Jay was the main witness at the trial. His story is as follows.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

It was the state's case against Adnan. ”This proves that adnan is innocent because this shows that the court used a unreliable source of evidence. This is when Jay told the police that adnan had murdered hae. ”The story Jay told police had problems, because it kept changing from telling to telling. ”This proves that adnan is innocent because This proves that even the police had not believed jay

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

Adnan can’t be considered guilty if there isn’t enough evidence present for a jury to make such as life changing decision. The only evidence used in this case was one testimony and the defendant’s phone records. The testimony was made by Jay Wilds who was with Adnan during the time of Hae’s disappearance. He stated that Adnan planned everything ahead of time and asked him to help after her death. Jay admitted to helping with the disposal of the body, but he’s testimony doesn’t sound trustworthy.

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

You can hear it, right? He's staunch.” Adnan will not hurt Hae. He really appreciates her so he says that he did not kill her. What is his motive to kill her?

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

This case has many holes and problems that bug me, one being the fact Adnan was sentenced without any physical evidence excluding call records. Hae’s reason for passing was strangulation which is a violent and personal crime, It doesn't add up to the statements Adnan and others observed about their relationship.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

People are convinced that Adnan committed the crime and that he is the killer. However, throughout the trial, there is a lack of evidence and also a lack of DNA evidence proving that Adnan did commit the crime. Syed was recently released from prison in September 2022 after serving 23 years. He is an alibi in the case meaning that he was accused of a crime while being elsewhere and being accused of a crime. There is a high possibility that Adnan is found guilty quickly because of his lack of emotions for Hae’s death and also since everything that happened throughout the case is pointed at Adnan for the blame.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Your life is not going to end. You'll move on, and I'll move on. But apparently you don't respect me enough to accept my decision" (Serial 6.4). There were many indications that Adnan had a motive to kill Hae, as suggested by his comments and letters he received from

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

This led to accusations claiming that Adnan killed Hae out of spite of the breakup. One argument presented was the fact that his religion could have driven him to commit the murder. The prosecution relied on ideas like honors killings from his culture, or rather the culture they assumed he fit into based on race. The prosecution claimed that Adnan killed her to protect his honor in the Islam faith and Pakistani culture, as the prosecution falsely identified him as Pakistani again, he is American. First, approaching the idea that his religion caused him to kill Hae.

Read More
141 Words | 1 Pages

Because of this podcast, it has shed some light on this case, as many believe Adnan is innocent. Therefore, I believe that Adnan is innocent because Jay’s story seems fishy, Adnan would have to do this murder flawlessly and

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Not a single claim that Jay has made about Adnan’s culpability for Hae’s murder can be verified by independent and external evidence. For example, the cell phone records shows no calls from seven to nine P.M., which his testimony about Adnan was in Leakin park during this time could not be verified, and there were also no physical evidence or eyewitness that connected Adnan to the crime. Which Jay had less credibility on the testimony he said about Adnan’s

Read More
1499 Words | 6 Pages

Putting these circumstances aside, it was said by many that the relationship was pretty typical and Adnan got over the breakup easily. This was said by teachers and friends of both Hae and Adnan. One of Hae’s friends, Becky, explained the relationship as “just a silly, teenage, high school, relationship” (Koenig “The Breakup”) which proves that Adnan was not as upset as the prosecution made him out to be at trial. Another notable aspect is that after Hae and Adnan broke up, Hae got in a small car accident and asked Adnan to come help her, her new boyfriend Don also showed up and confirms that him and Adnan had a cordial meeting and explains that they talked for 10 to 15 minutes even after the car situation had been figured out (Koenig “What We Know”). If Adnan was really that broken up about the breakup, he would not have been so friendly towards the new guy who seemed to take his place in Hae’s life.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

These two reasons are all that a person should need to believe that Adnan didn't have enough motive, or time, to kill Hae. Jays testimony sets the timeline and proves there is enough evidence, which is not presented by Adnan’s lawyer, to say Adnan is innocent by a straying story. The time period where Hae could've been killed does not match Adnan’s timeline. Jay, who is a convicted felon, was the only witness and is trusted to give a good story. Cristina Gutierrez, who was Adnan’s lawyer, had medical issues that distracted her from using useful information in his case.

Read More

More about What Is The Case Against Adnan Syed Case

Open Document