ipl-logo

What Is The Difference Between Fight Theory And Truth Theory

1219 Words5 Pages

The fight theory and truth theory are two different approaches to the legal system that can impact the way courts and judicial processes operate. Fight theory is focused on adversarial advocacy, where each side presents arguments and evidence to try and win the case. In this approach, the legal system is seen as a battleground where lawyers compete against each other to win the case for their client. The fight theory assumes that the truth will emerge as a result of the adversarial process and that the best way to uncover the truth is to have each side fight it out in court. On the other hand, truth theory is focused on finding the objective truth of the matter at hand. This approach assumes that there is a single objective truth that can be …show more content…

Board of Education (1954), this landmark case sought to end racial segregation in public schools. The lawyers representing the plaintiffs presented factual evidence and argued that segregation was unconstitutional and harmful to children’s education. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on the evidence presented. Another example would be the O.J. Simpson Trial (1995), the prosecution in this high-profile murder case presented forensic evidence, eyewitness testimony, and other factual evidence to support their case. While the defense argued passionately on behalf of their client, they did not present evidence to refute the prosecution’s case. Unfortunately, the defense flipped the trial into a race-related trial claiming the police were corrupt and the major mistake was allowing O.J. to try on the blood-soaked glove where the famous line “if the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” O.J. Simpson was acquitted of the …show more content…

In many cases, there may be multiple competing versions of the “truth”, and it can be challenging to determine which version is the most accurate. Additionally, even if a decision-maker (judge or jury) is able to determine the “truth” it may not always be possible to translate this into a fair or just outcome for all involved parties. Another issue with the truth theory is that it can prioritize factual accuracy and evidence-based decision-making at the expense of other important values such as fairness, equity, and social justice. This approach can be particularly problematic in cases where the evidence is unclear or ambiguous, or where the legal system is biased against certain groups or

Show More
Related

Johnnie Cochran And The Murder Of Geronimo Pratt

414 Words | 2 Pages

In the end, O.J. Simpson was found not guilty for the

Read More

Oj Simpson Research Paper

1051 Words | 5 Pages

Everyone believes the oj did it but there was once piece of evidence that made oj get the verdict he wanted and all because of a black glove that had been found at the murder scene they asked oj to put it on and it did not fit his hand and that shocked the jurors to no end and the reconsidered their decision and then they went to collaborate and the verdict will be ready on tv with the whole nation watching watching the verdict around the world coming

Read More

Oj Simpson Case

627 Words | 3 Pages

The public assumed that he committed murder even though evidence did not completely prove he was the murderer. With the evidence that the cops have found, OJ actually committed the murder. Not only his blood and shoe prints were found at the crime scene but even witnesses heard all the commotion. OJ’s fingerprints was found on many things and found a black african hair DNA inside of a

Read More

Was Oj Simpson Guilty

861 Words | 4 Pages

In 1995, former NFL player O.J. Simpson was put on trial for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O.J. Simpson’s trial is believed to be one of the most popular and controversial trials to ever take place in the Los Angeles Superior Court. O.J. was found not guilty by the verdict and was released to go on and live his life. But my belief is, O.J. should have been found guilty, because of all the of the evidence that was found at the scene and later on in the investigation they discovered more evidence. Also because of the book that Nicole’s brothers published later after her death.

Read More

Case Study On Brown Vs Board Of Education

999 Words | 4 Pages

Brown vs. Board of Education This court case was about segregation. The appellants were Oliver Brown, Mrs. Richard Lawton, Mrs. Sadie Emmanuel, etc. The appellee was the Board of Education.

Read More

Oj Simpson Research Papers

957 Words | 4 Pages

The day after the murder OJ Simpson had fresh cuts on his body (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). OJ Simpson acted really weird when the police called him to inform him about Nicole Brown’s death (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). Simpson tried and blamed another guy, which was his friend, named Charlie (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/Simpson/Simpson.htm). Investigators should have found more evidence at the crime scene, because everyone knew that OJ Simpson did kill his wife and her friend, Ronald

Read More

Was Oj Simpson Guilty

1411 Words | 6 Pages

As we all know, O.J. Simpson was acquitted. The court had ten out of twelve jurors find Simpson not guilty. One reason he was acquitted, was because the glove found at the scene did not fit. It simply would not go on Simpson’s hand.

Read More

Oj Simpson Research Paper

1376 Words | 6 Pages

This, coupled with the love for O.J. in the black community, led many people to believe that the athlete was innocent. As the trial brimmed, the public became more restless for news. The case was not just about Nicole Brown and Goldman’s tragic deaths. It was about the racial tensions between black citizens and the police that were employed to protect them. Simpson pleads “Absolutely, 100 percent not guilty” to all charges against him and offers rewards to find the real killers.

Read More

Oj Simpson Research Paper

799 Words | 4 Pages

OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Framing Truths How do we know what is true? How do we know if a man sentenced to death was truly a murderer? A question echoed by thousands of people revolting against the death penalty as the story of Todd Willingham made it to the headlines. In The New Yorker, under the title of Trial by Fire, came the terrifying enigma: “Did Texas execute an innocent man?” followed by a thorough listing of the evidence that was used to convict Willingham of setting his house on fire and resulting in the death of his three children, and how they were later disproved. There is a great misconception about the source of controversy in issues like these.

Read More

Who Is Oj Simpson Guilty For The Trial Of The Century

1304 Words | 6 Pages

Simpson not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, evidence discovered during, and after the trial, proves that there could have been different reasons for his acquittal. An abundant amount of evidence proves that O.J. Simpson should have ultimately been proven guilty for the murders. However, many people overlooked the facts and decided the verdict based on their morals and emotions. Danielle Henderson states through the New York Times “The amount of O.J.’s blood found on the crime scene, on his socks, and in his car should have made the jury’s decision an easy one. Darden’s focus on the violence regularly inflicted upon Nicole and his characterization of the relationship as a “ticking time bomb” make it easy for him to point to O.J. in court and call him a murderer.

Read More

Jurors Are Not Guilty In Twelve Angry Men

644 Words | 3 Pages

Guilty or not guilty, all citizens deserve a thorough trial to defend their rights. Formulating coherent stories from events and circumstances almost cost a young boy his life. In Twelve Angry Men, 1957, a single juror did his duty to save the life of an 18 year old boy by allowing his mind to rationalize the cohesive information presented by the court and its witnesses. The juror’s name was Mr. Davis, he was initially the only one of 12 jurors to vote not guilty in reason that the young boy, sentenced with first degree murder, may be innocent. I am arguing that system 1 negatively affects the jurors opinion on the case and makes it difficult for Mr. Davis to convince the other jurors of reasonable doubt.

Read More

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More

Brown V Board Of Education Essay

439 Words | 2 Pages

One of the most historic cases in the United States of America, Brown v. Board of Education, occurred in 1954 in the city of Topeka, Kansas. Back in the day, public schools were separated by race, black and white. Two young girls, Linda Brown and her sister, attended an all-black school which was not so close to their home. While there was another school closer to their house, it was only for white students. In order to get to the bus stop to go to school, both girls had to walk thru a dangerous path which included a railway yard.

Read More

Why Is Oj Simpson Innocent

1610 Words | 7 Pages

OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling

Read More

More about What Is The Difference Between Fight Theory And Truth Theory

Related Topics

Open Document