ipl-logo

What Is The Little Albert Experiment Unethical

746 Words3 Pages

This study is crucial for shedding light on this unethical experiment. Because so many people are suffering from the trauma and physical and mental harm caused by these experiments, and because not many people are aware that this has happened or is still happening in numerous experiments today. It is crucial to understand and learn about them.
The Little Albert Experiment is just one of many unethical experiments that have been conducted in the past. This study aimed to determine whether fear could be classically conditioned in humans. A baby named Albert, whose real name was Douglas Merritte, was used as the test subject for this experiment. They continually frightened him with a loud noise paired with white rats. When the experimenters placed …show more content…

From that, he learned about the generalization of classical conditioning, which was that fear could be broadened to more than one thing or subject just by association. For example, since they conditioned Little Albert to have a fear of the white rats in the laboratory, he developed a fear of anything that seemed to be similar. They tested him on five things: a white dog, a white rabbit, a fur coat, cotton wool, and a Father Christmas mask. Even though these three things were never paired with the loud noise; they all cause the same conditioned response as the white rats. This was what they found out through generalization. Other than generalization, they also discovered that if classical conditioning is not reinforced, it can slowly fade away. It does not matter if it was very strong at some point. This was what they called …show more content…

This experiment was based on the response of a single subject. Some individuals may not respond identically, but it is possible to be classically conditioned. The experiment was conducted using behaviorist principles based on empiricism and observational testing. This approach to psychology was a direct response to earlier psychoanalytic approaches that emphasized self-reflection and personal interpretation. The association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior works in humans.
How ethical was the experiment in its time and would still be considered ethical today? Why or why not?
The Little Albert Experiment was conducted in 1920. During this time, research was frequently conducted without regard for the participants. There were no rules to follow during that time period. As a result of these experiments, ethical guidelines have been developed. With the current ethical standards in place, the Little Albert experiment is deemed unethical. The reason for this is that the subject should always be protected during experiments. Their mental and physical well-being comes first. The Little Albert experiment did the exact opposite. They exploited Albert for their own personal gain.
If you were the experimenter, what would you do differently when conducting this

Show More
Related
743 Words | 3 Pages

According to Slater, the purpose of the experiments were to test the idea of “obedience to authority” (58). While I do see that the experiments appear to have started as a way to test obedience, I think they stopped too early for this to be true. If they had

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

experiment.4 A TV show, books, interviews, and appearances on national and appearances on nationally famous shows were what Jane Elliot received from this experiment. Although it is successful, it is also criticized a lot due to its ethical issues. On one hand, this experiment opened up people’s eyes to the corrupt nature of racism and segregation and inflicted change on

Read More
2216 Words | 9 Pages

Without the subjects' knowledge or agreement, these tests were conducted with utter disregard for their welfare. The protection of human life and dignity cannot be compromised in the name of scientific progress. They serve as a sobering reminder of the value of sustaining moral standards in all scientific study and the ethical ramifications of these experiments, which are still being argued today. The legacy of the Nazi medical experiments serves as a sobering reminder of the atrocities that may be perpetrated in the name of a belief system and the repercussions of disrespecting human

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

Name and describe three experiments that violated ethical guidelines. What guideline did they violate? Milgram: The Milgram experiment was an experiment that tested an individual's willingness the follow the instructions of an authority figure.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The blue eyed – brown eyed experiment in my opinion is indeed ethical. The issue at hand with this experiment is will it cause permeant future psychological damage. Jane Elliott conducted this experiment with her third-grade students which some would say it is too harsh of an exercise for a group that young; She wanted to teach her student that discrimination is wrong which have been a topic they discussed from the first day of school but felt the student would become confused with the fact she just honored Dr. king in the month of February and now she had to explain to them that he was assassinated because of discrimination. Jane Elliott agreed that this exercise can do Psychological damage if not conducted correctly but the benefits are remarkable.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford prison experiment provided valuable insights into human psychology and the power of authority. It demonstrated how normal people can become dictators or worse depending on circumstances and situations. However, the experiment also caused harm to participants. The scientists could not intervene, as their goal was to discover what would happen. The media could have broadcasted or televised the experiment, allowing participants to behave differently under supervision.

Read More
2094 Words | 9 Pages

The Little Albert experiment was a case study showing empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study also provides an example of stimulus generalization. It was carried out by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, at Johns Hopkins University. The results were first published in the February 1920 issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology. After observing children in the field, Watson hypothesized that the fearful response of children to loud noises is an innate unconditioned response.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

I do believe however, the experiment was vital in finding a key element in how people in society assume roles. Both experiments did however bring results that were astonishing to the department of psychology and was well used for future experiments. I believe that based off of older experiments and as time progressed, more and more ethical guidelines were put in place to protect such

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that the experiment is considered ethical because it only affected the children emotionally for a very short

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

It shocked and fascinated the scientific community all over the world with not only by its disturbing findings, but also with its questionable and unethical experimental methods. The aim of the experiment was to place an individual in a situation in which they would be forced to choose either to obey or disobey the commands given by an authoritative

Read More
149 Words | 1 Pages

This shows how power in status can be manipulated, since the higher up have more money and higher status, they can do whatever they want to. If it were not for the concern of other, who knows how long this experiment would have went on or if the public would even hear about this misconduct of experiment. In 1968, people like Peter Buxtun and others were concerned about the ethnic of this experiment and decide to do something about it. As a result more and more people found out about this experiment and the rules and policies for human subjects research have been reviewed and revised many times since they were first approved. In order for something to take into action, people must care and wants to find justice.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

The major key findings that were discovered in this study include the idea that it is possible that after being conditioned to react to a certain stimulus, the subject could possibly begin to generalize different objects that may cause the subject to react the same way towards the generalized stimuli as the subject did to the original stimulus. Another finding is that classical conditioning is something that could potentially have a long lasting effect on someone, especially if the subject formed a generalization to the original stimulus. The researchers felt that because of the lack of experimental evidence provided about the subject before this experiment prompted them to research it

Read More
1863 Words | 8 Pages

But why? Why were these experiments conducted in the first place? As the war raged on, new obstacles came in the direction of the Germans. The experiments were conducted partially intending to help resolve these solutions. Other reasons were to help fulfill the Nazi party’s larger visions.

Read More

More about What Is The Little Albert Experiment Unethical

Related Topics

Open Document