What is the perfect amount of power for an executive leader to have and what would happen if this leader would have too much power? When it comes to an executive leader’s power, a happy medium must be obtained in order to have a successful government. Ultimately, the executive leader should have enough power to react to an attack or threat in a timely manner, but not enough power that the executive leader can do whatever he or she wants. When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution, they had to establish an executive leader because under the Articles of Confederation it took too long for pressing matters to be dealt with and there was no one for foreign countries to look to.
Article II of the Constitution set up the the Executive Branch which established the role of the president and vested the executive power in the President of the United States of
…show more content…
One could argue that under a dictatorship more can get done because there are no checks and balances in which the dictator has to get permission from anyone. At any instant the dictator could take action to deploy troops, handle a health epidemic, or send assistance after a natural disaster. Furthermore, it is possible for people to encourage a political leader to take more power in which they are unconsciously encouraging dictatorship without realizing it. For example, Joseph E Uscinski wrote in the article “Star Wars and the Executive Branch,” “many of his [Obama’s] supporters urged him to sidestep Congress to more quickly and easily enact certain policies without having to negotiate with the other party or institutions.” If the United States was a dictatorship, then Barack Obama would have had the power to do whatever he wanted which would have upset Republican’s beliefs. However, there would have been nothing Republicans could do to combat Obama if he were a