What would science classes look like if the Scientific Revolution had never occurred? Would students still study cells and learn about the solar system as we know it? The Scientific Revolution was a major historical turning point in which progressive thinkers looked beyond the Church's teachings and set out to discover a deeper understanding of the world around them. People began to question what they were taught and instead opted to figure it out for themselves, resulting in countless discoveries about the world around them that are still taught today. The microscope, Galileo Galilei, and Sir Isaac Newton were all key components of the Scientific Revolution and its legacy.
The microscope was an invention of the Scientific Revolution that changed
…show more content…
He agreed with the teachings of the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus, who believed that the sun was the center of the universe, otherwise known as the heliocentric theory. While today it is universally known and accepted that the sun is the center of earth’s solar system, it was not in Copernicus’ or Galileo’s time. The Catholic Church believed that God would have put His greatest creations, humans, at the center of the universe, thus supporting a geocentric theory. While some scientists agreed with the heliocentric theory, they could not be too vocal in their support due to the Church’s presence. Copernicus himself did not publish his findings until he was on his deathbed to avoid persecution by the Church. Galileo, however, had modified his telescope to be much better than any other astronomer’s at the time. He used his telescope to be the first to record observations of the sky made with the assistance of a telescope (Solar System Exploration). He revealed his findings, as he now had even more evidence to support the heliocentric theory. When the Church found his claims, Galileo was persecuted for heresy and put on house arrest for the rest of his life (History.com Editors). He was forced to deny that he agreed with the heliocentric theory due to the pressure the Church put on him. His use of an improved telescope served as indisputable evidence that the solar system was heliocentric, although the …show more content…
He also invented calculus and made advancements in optics. Prior to his discovery of gravity, other scholars made similar theories to his own laws, which he used for inspiration in his findings (Stokes). Common people, however, did not have an exact understanding of why or how the moon circled the earth or why or how they stayed stable on the earth's surface; they did not even know that the two facts were related at all. There was no realistic explanation as to why things fell towards the earth and not towards the sky, or as to why the moon and sun were always in the sky. No one really knew how the ocean’s tides were a result of gravity or had a mathematical equation explaining why objects with greater mass had greater force than those with lesser mass. Newton's laws are still a major part of modern physics and contributed to the development of space travel (National Geographic). Had scientists not had concrete laws to follow or a scientific explanation for the force of gravity, how would they design something meant to go directly against earth’s gravitational pull? Newton’s discoveries made many modern advancements