ipl-logo

When Is Human Cloning Wrong

917 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Morals and ethics of human cloning

It is unbelievable how some scientists find it ethical and normal cloning humans. Human cloning is the making of a hereditarily or artificially indistinguishable typically identical duplicate of a human in which the offspring result is not from the chance of the union of ova and sperm; not sexually reproduced. The term is by and large used to allude to manufactured human cloning, which is the reproduction generation of cells and tissue of a human. It does not refer to the regular conception and birth of identical twins. The likelihood of human cloning has raised contentions. These moral issues have provoked a few countries to pass laws with respect to human cloning and its lawfulness. Cloning can be beneficial in some cases such as if parents …show more content…

The first mammal to be cloned in 1996 was named Dolly the sheep. Since the declaration of Dolly numerous inquiries have been raised in respect to whether humans to be cloning ought to be next. Despite the fact that a fruitful human clone would be an achievement for the universe of science, we must inquire as to whether the prize is justified regardless of the dangers. These issues convey an awesome danger of happening in human cloning. Dolly the cloned sheep has died on February 2003 by a lung disease; what may be the effects of cloning on human …show more content…

Genes are normally very reactive to the surroundings. So once there is a reaction that happened against the normal reaction it will result in a change in the whole process causing gene malformation; which will lead mutation, the change in gene structure, which can cause physical and mental defects and retardations. Cloned mammles naturally tend to be much bigger at birth, with larger abnormal organs; scientists call this "Large Offspring Syndrome" (LOS). LOS can develop kidney and heart failure and weakened immune systems, and they usually do not survive so much of time in life and if by any means they lived some time they life suffering from problems caused by Large offspring syndrome. Professor Ian Wilmut, leader of the team that cloned Dolly the Sheep said 'There is abundant evidence that cloning can and does go wrong, and no justification for believing this will not happen with

Show More
Related
2906 Words | 12 Pages

There are many arguments in support of human cloning. Some are fairly easy to accept, such as elimination of genetic disease”(Human Cloning). With the technology of cloning, the percentages of disease could reduce. That also includes genetic issues could be solved as well. Cloning has been said to give therapeutic support when making new cures.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Sean Hampton said “Victory is the child of preparation and determination.” My first year of attending Thomson Middle School I was determined to play, no matter how much I had to work I was determined. The coaches had a meeting were they informed us on a few rules. One was that you had to be in the seventh and eighth grade to participate. A pile of disappointment tumbled into the bottom of my stomach because I was only in the sixth grade.

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

Read More
1307 Words | 6 Pages

Is it ethical to create human clones for our benefits, notwithstanding those clones area unit whole entities with hearts, souls and wills? McHanan points out, “one potentially valuable use of cloning is to supply a source of tissues or organs for transplantation. the foremost vital objection to the present use of biological research is that a person's clone would be the kind of entity that it might be seriously wrong to kill” (77). Willgoose says, “Many worry that the clone won't be treated as a valued individual, however rather as a possession or commodity” (106, 107). underneath the establishment, clones area unit doubtless to be made for another to human testing of assorted researches or as surgical process donors.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

I believe human cloning interferes with nature in ways humanity will not be able to handle. This source states, " This could lead to a set of problems that we have no ability to handle. " The evidence suggests that human cloning can lead to the fall of humanity, due to clones becoming soverienty. However, some people believe that human cloning can be useful, due to assisting with unlawful interests. I beleive that this will only create misuse of knowledge in trying to correct clones in right paths.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

From a scientific standpoint, reproductive cloning would rob the clones of their individuality, as they are exactly like someone in the past that people would expect them to live up to, as Gerald Ford stated, “From there it is a short step toward a soulless state wherein assembly line man is robbed of his individuality by science run amok”(Ford). Also, the clones do not have a say in whether they want that or not, which would make them feel like they were quite literally robbed of their individuality, as they are humans, too, who would have existed as a completely different person had it not been for cloning. On another note, If human clones do not turn out perfect, their “creators” may abandon them, and that could affect the clones in a negative way and make them want revenge on their creators for doing that to them, similar to how the creature felt in Frankenstein. In the quote “He had abandoned me: and, in the bitterness of my heart, I cursed him” (Shelley), Victor Frankenstein ran from his own creation, something similar could happen if after the cloning the parent realizes that they are “playing god,” or that what they are doing is “immoral,” leading to abandonment. Moreover, human clones would have no choice but to live with being clones, and possibly the pain of some kind of mutation caused by their cloning.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

The idea of cloning human came from cloning Dolly who is a sheep. Human cloning became a new possibility after the successful cloning of Dolly the Sheep. Cloning humans is extremely threatening for women’s health and can impact her future fertility. If a failure were to happen we would be looking at abortion, miscarriages and birth of malformed. Also there is no possibility that the clone would have the same exact personality and values as the original human.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Nonetheless, it is a new human life and the determination to destroy it and limit its use to scientific research for therapeutic ends compound further the moral issues rather than protect mankind. As such, cloning embryonic human life under any circumstance crosses an ethical line, takes an irrevocable step, from which science can never turn back (Reillly 's work (as cited in Robinson, 2013). Again the opposition argument for cloning has deep religious ties, which in most beliefs is blatant act against God. The future will hold a certain sense of uncertainty, as the subject of cloning continues to be grossly divided.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, Dolly the sheep 's chromosomes had shorter telomere lengths than normal. This means that Dolly 's cells were aging faster than the cells from a normal sheep. Still to day, scientists aren 't sure why cloned animals show differences in telomere length. Lastly, cloned animals that do survive are usually much bigger at birth than their natural counterparts. Scientists call this "Large Offspring Syndrome" (LOS).

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

What it means is that cloning is actually allowed but only for the sake of improving human health, and any means for reproductive cloning is strongly prohibited (Frazzetto, 2004). In additional, there is also an ethical issue on how the egg cells are obtained. In the cloning experiment of Dolly the sheep, it takes 277 trials to eventually produce Dolly, which means 277 of egg cells is used just for a single cloning of Dolly (Morris, 2006). Normally, the egg cells are derived from the donor of IVF patients, but other than that the egg cells that the researchers get are from the women who donating their own oocytes through various risks and discomforts procedure. This issue becomes clear in the ‘Hwang Scandal’ where a Korean stem cells researcher had pressured his junior members to donate their oocytes for cloning experiments (Saunders & Savulescu, 2008; Devolder,

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Cloning at the gene level is acceptable and is done extensively in research areas. However, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning raises skepticism and debate both in the general society and the scientific community. Among the argument raised is the possibility of cloning human beings; whether the individuals derived are seen as a complete human with the whole set of human rights attached to them. Body >>> Scientific Advantage <<< 2 PAR Fiester (2005) states that most of the animal cloning projects are driven by the goal of meeting human needs such as treatment of diseases, food production, and entertainment. However, there are animal cloning projects aimed at conserving endangered or

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

Read More
1531 Words | 7 Pages

Due to the rapid progress of research in human cloning, scientists are able to create genetic copies of human beings, resulting in a population, lacking genetic variety. With this in mind, I believe the cloning of humans to be wrong; it is fundamentally unethical as it leads to the degrading of humanity (Humans?) Moreover, there are also major risks that are associated with the development of the medical cloning technology. For this reason, I strongly believe that scientists should seize research to successfully clone humans.

Read More

More about When Is Human Cloning Wrong

Related Topics

Open Document