Hamilton’s Financial Plan
There are many reasons as to why this financial plan, proposed by Alexander Hamilton, is not supported by the South, the West, and all the Democratic-Republicans. Hamilton’s Financial Plan does not benefit the farmers and the poor in any way, shape or form, and in fact, causes more harm than good. It wrongfully taxes these people, as well as, allows no participation in the new national bank. It also changes the currency, which interferes with the states’ rights. Not only that, but it contradicts what the Constitution states.
Part of Hamilton’s Plan was to create a national bank for the United States. It was modeled after the Bank Of England. The objective of the bank was to collect taxes, hold government funds, and make loans to the government and borrowers. However, as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison has strictly interpreted the Constitution, it did not allow or give power to congress or the federal government to create a national bank. They got this idea from the Tenth Amendment of the
…show more content…
That should be reserved to the people of the United States. Secondly, Hamilton’s Financial Plan challenges the Constitution by promoting a stronger central government due to the requirements of the plan. These requirements include allowing the federal government to pay off all debts, greatly limiting the participation of the poor and the farmers in the national bank, and last but not least, changing the currency, which interferes with the State’s rights. All these reasons, along with many others, leads to much resistance to the Hamilton’s Financial Plan because it completely contradicts and challenges the