Sherlock Holmes had not been culpable for Dr.Roylotts death. The story “The Adventure of a Speckled Band”, written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, portrayed a mystery story. Throughout the story, Sherlock Holmes had to defend himself from the swam adder. In addition, Holmes was not able to predict that Dr. Grimsby Roylott could be bitten by the snake. Lastly, Sherlock Holmes was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia Stoner and wanted to murder Helen Stoner due to money. In summation, Sherlock Holmes was not responsible for Roylott’s death. Sherlock Holmes confronted the venomous swamp adder from India, with a vigorous incident that had occurred. Sherlock Holmes decided to spend the night in Helen’ s room with Dr.Watson to observe the mysterious whistling noise Helen and Julia claimed to hear at nightfall. Later that evening, there came a ephemeral gleam from the ventilator, which connected Dr. Roylott as well as Julia and Helen’s room; moreover, a precipitous reticent whistle noise. This allowed Holmes to immediately light the match. The passage states, “It is a swamp adder!. . . The deadliest snake in India.” This statement supports Sherlocks fear of this deadly animal. The doubters may believe Sherlock meant to kill Dr. Roylott due to …show more content…
Roylotts’s death by a toxin serpent. The story mentions, within Dr.Roylott’s room was a safe, worn chair, leash, and a milk bowl. The milk bowl was the snake’s reward; therefore, the snake was trained to return to the specific location. According the the passage, the ventilator was the only point at which the two rooms had connected. As a result, he could not situate the exact placement of the snake. To support, there was no imaginable way to gather information on Roylott’s location. It might appear that Holmes purposefully guided the snake to that room. Nevertheless, Holmes could not adumbrate Dr.Roylott was about to perish. Ergo Sherlock Holmes was not the culprit to this