Julius Caesars actions were okay because everything he did was for the good of his country. If he committed a crime, it was to help Rome expand or get more money, I know this because Rome became richer and bigger. But if you're gonna do something bad and think you're helping out, think about the consequences. Caesars actions were justified when he tried to murder Vercingétorix, he committed adultery with Cleopatra, and took over countries to expand land. Julius Caesar almost broke the law when he wanted to kill Vercingétorix.
Who killed caesar ? Julius Caesar was a Roman general, he was a well known political leader of the Roman republic who transformed what is now called the Roman Empire. He did this by applying it’ imperial system. According to a Trojan prince Aeneas, Julius birth started the new chapter in Roman history. When Julius was thirty one , he had fought in a lot of wars and became one with Roman politics, after some alliances, Julius became the dictator of the Roman Empire.
To one of the smartest, deliberate, and malicious war generals in history, how did you not see those senators coming? I mean, you received plenty of seemingly obvious signs that something unfavorable would happen to you. Calpurnia warned you, the soothsayer told you to beware the Ides, and the autopsy revealed you had a letter in your hand telling you of the conspiracy. I would think a man of your stature would more than obviously know that something was up. So, was being murdered part of your overall scheme?
Is it right to betray your best friend for the general good of the public? In Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a group of conspirators, led by a man named Brutus , plotted against and killed their best friend for the public. But a man named Marcus Antony wants revenge. Marcus Antony must seek revenge for the fall of Caesar, and he attempts to do so by giving a speech at Caesar’s funeral in which he appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos to get the plebeians on his side. One technique Antony uses to start his speech is by appealing to logos.
In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions.
The Senate, did not kill Caesar. It was a group of resentful and angry Senators, such as Cassius and Brutus who disliked Caesar. Some Senators supported Caesar. There are two conflicting reasons on the assassination of Caesar.
The conspiracy “Et tu, Brute?” were Julius Caesar's last words when he realized his best friend and other men that he thought were standing with him conspired to murder him. Were Brutus' reasons enough to murder or did he take the easy way out? Was Julius really a terrible person or was everyone around him threatened by his power? Why when you google or ask about Julius Caesar he is talked about like one of the most powerful leaders of rome, but his friends thought he was terrible enough to murder him? Did he ever do anything evil or was it just jealousy?
Hunter Hartman Mr. Ioannidis English 10 B 22 May 2024 How Antony Persuaded the Crowd In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the crowd was convinced by Brutus, that Caesar was very ambitious and the conspirators made the right choice by killing him. Then Antony had his speech in which he used rhetorical devices to persuade the crowd into believing Caesar was a good person. Then he stated how the conspirators were not loyal like they said they were. He was so clever when he spoke, he completely controlled the crowd. He got them to do some crazy things.
The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2004). In January of 49 BC, Julius Caesar led his army across the Rubicon River in Northern Italy (see Caesar Crosses the Rubicon, 49 BC) and plunged the Roman Republic into civil war. Caesar's rival, Pompey, fled to Greece. Within three months Caesar controlled the entire Italian peninsula and in Spain had defeated the legions loyal to Pompey by Michael Parenti
Julius Caesar upsets many people which leads to his assassination. Act 1 foreshadows his assassination with the people’s dissent and disapproval. In the first scene Marullus scolds the cobbler when he takes a day off to celebrate the triumph of Caesar because he waited “the livelong day with patient expectation/ To see great Pompey pass the streets of Rome. /And when you saw his chariot but appear, /Have
Was the death of Julius Caesar justified or unjustified? Even though some people didn’t agree with Julius Caesar, nevertheless his death is unjustified because it was out of greed and not for the good of the Roman Empire. Julius Caesar was murdered by his friends out of fear of him becoming overpowered. Julius Caesar brought wealth to Rome and helped the poor people out which gave them happiness.
Introduction Errors will always occur in any business where people do activities. The rise of Julius Caesar to power and the subsequent fall of the Roman Republic in 27 BCE were caused by faults in the Roman Republic, including economic issues, government corruption, criminality, and private armies. I'll talk about how private armies ended the Roman Republic and some other minor reasons in this journal. Then I make suggestions for how to lessen the impact of these private armies.
The murders of Julius Caesar is Brutus,Cassius,and the senate. “But Brutus, one of the conspirators who was then thought of as a firm friend, came up and said, 'What is this, Caesar? Are you a man to pay attention to a woman 's dreams and the idle gossip of stupid men, and to insult the Senate by not going out, although it has honored you and has been specially summoned by you? But listen to me, cast aside the forebodings of all these people, and come. The Senate has been in session waiting for you since early this morning.
Generally speaking, Cornelius Dolabella is strongly on the position of sympathizer of Julius Caesar, agreeing on that first two of the main conspirator, Brutus, and Cassis must be executed. Not only for an honor of a nation, winning popularity, but also enlarging the power for a next leader which will keep him safe. And the other liberators who were involved must serve a jail sentence, and 80% of their properties will be taken by the government. These result will reduce the anger of the publics, who supported Caesar, despite he was a dictator. He had been giving land to poor Romans, provide lands for military veterans after their service, and made a law against extortion.
Murder is the unlawful planned out killing of one human being by another, which in society is seen as an action that is morally incorrect and should not be done; yet can this act under any circumstance ever be justified? In the Shakespearean play, Julius Caesar, a group of conspirators are against Caesar's rise in power and popularity, so they assassinate him to prevent Cesar from ascending greatly in power and becoming a tyrant. Even though the conspirators had the “good of Rome” in their intentions, Caesar's murder was not justified. Caesar was murdered under the pretext that he was gaining too much support and would eventually become a danger, and his “ambitious” behavior. Therefore, Caesar was murdered out of jealousy, morally incorrect
