More handpicked essays just for you.
Community college vs university comparison
Community college vs university comparison
Community college vs university comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article “Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges?”, Kevin Carey presents three claims when it comes to For-Profit Colleges. These three argumentative claims consist of For-Profits are taking advantage of Federal Aid as well as student loans because of the outrageous prices and lastly that the government should regulate loans given to the For-Profit Colleges. Carey states how a large number of students are graduating from these For-Profit Colleges with horrifying loans for worthless degrees. It is well known that For-Profits charge much more than universities and public colleges. Carey and I both agree with the Obama Administration cutting off federal aid to these schools giving graduates huge debt.
This is evidenced strongly allover the article. I strongly believe that Ms. Lowrey has denied the existence of colleges with their own professors and administration. Ms Lowrey sketches a perfect comparing example for readers by mentioning “the car labels” introduced by the Department of Transportation. “Consumer-friendly” term for
In his article “Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges?” Kevin Carey offers harsh criticisms of for-profit colleges by claiming that they are directly to blame for the disproportionately high quantity of debt that their postgraduate students acquire. His primary reasoning for such is that for-profit colleges are charging more for their degrees than they are actually worth. He himself writes, “for-profits charge much more than public colleges and universities. Many of their students come from moderate- and low-income backgrounds…
It is clear that Andrew Rosen, the chief executive of Kaplan, wants to leave readers of Change.edu with the idea that for-profit colleges are innovative, efficient, and effective in serving people left out by traditional higher education, and that their bad reputation is the result of unfair attacks. I picked up Rosen 's book wanting to see how the power of the market can transform the enterprise and improve student learning. Instead, I am now more concerned about the hazards of for-profit colleges than I was before. The eye-opening, gasp-inducing elements involve Rosen 's descriptions of the intense pressures on company executives to produce quick, huge profits for investors by shortchanging students.
Society has a very skewed opinion of what college is, how it should look, and what each individual type of person should experience while in college. In Tressie McMillan Cottom’s Lower Ed: The Troubling Rise of For-Profit Colleges in the New Economy, she investigates what for-profit colleges are to modern society and how they affect various types of lives. She does this by placing herself into different social roles to put into perspective to her audience the different types of lives that affected by for-profit colleges, the role of for-profit colleges in personal and professional settings, and why she personally understands what for-profit schools are by being in these roles. Cottom takes her societal roles in two directions. The first is
People attend college to become successful, independent adults, and for-profit schools draw the attention of many students because of the short amount of time the school claims to give out a degree. In the article, Why Lower-Income Students are Drawn to For-Profit schools, by Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz, real-life examples are provided of the negative effects of for-profit schools. What many students thought was going to better his/her future, actually brought it down. High school graduates are reeled into the advertisements of for-profit schools and in the end are left with major debt and even struggle to start his/her career. Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz reveals the secret behind for-profit schools through the use of ethos.
Carey strategically chooses each word to build his article. For instance, he writes that “horror stories of aggressive recruiters’ inducing students to take out huge loans for nearly worthless degrees are filling the news” (Carey). In this statement, Carey carefully chose each word so that they support his claims. He compares the “huge loans” from “aggressive recruiters” to “nearly worthless degrees” to show the imbalances that for profits have. By using words with negative connotation, the reader knows where Carey stands and can easily deduce the negatives of for-profit higher education, just as Carey wants.
Overall, Addison's persuasive essay effectively conveys the value of community college in preparing students for success at a four-year university. The author also proves her claim that community colleges still hold such value through the use of pathos. She emphasizes that she hopes for everyone to find good education and describes community college as “America’s public service gem.” Liz Addison informs her audience about her empathy for others and says that she would campaign for every campus “simply to make sure that anyone who is looking to go to college in this country knows where to find one.” She takes the time to make students heard and seen, because typically, community college is not looked upon as a high education.
Were these schools destined to be underfunded because there was no other financial backing? How far have we come as it relates to this issue? HBCUs are still struggling today to stay afloat. It is the opinion of this writer that yes, these institutions were needed, however, when left up to others to care for our needs, often we are left with the short end of the
In fact, Wilson states, “some students enroll in high-priced for-profit programs only to learn later that their certificates or degrees are not as useful on the job market as they had expected” (pp 263-4). Many students would surely need a loan to afford a for-profit degree, and that loan would need to be significantly higher than what would be needed in a public or private college. Furthermore, the devalued for-profit degree makes it far more difficult to secure a job that will compensate for the loan. If public or private college is not reasonable, then Addison’s community college is a much wiser decision than a for-profit institution.
In the article “Two Years are Better than Four,” Liz Addison argues that community college is better than four year universities, such as the one Rick Perlstein attended. Where Perlstein reminisces about his days in college and claims that the greatness of American colleges is gone. Addison makes it apparent to the reader that she not only disagrees with Perlstein, but makes remarks suggesting that she believes that Perlstein’s college days were less for studying and more for partying and enjoying the fact that he went to a fancy private college. Addison continues by detailing some of the opportunities for people that attend community college such as being affordable, a place for the student to begin, and possibly a better match for students’ lives. She claims that this is the way college is intended to be and by no means is college as we knew it coming to an end.
Recently, many have begun to attack and degrade higher education in the United States. In the book How College Works, authors Daniel Chambliss and Christopher Takacs claim, “As state support has eroded, and as more students attend college in an increasingly desperate attempt to find viable jobs, the price to students of attending an institution of higher education has gone up, especially at more selective institutions” (172). So is college even worth it? Caroline Bird’s excerpt from her book Case Against College “Where College Fails Us” is an adequately written article that agrees with those who question whether college is a good investment. Bird argues that although some students would benefit from college and succeed, many fall short, wasting
So, for-profit colleges sounds like a grand idea, for both students in the area, teachers, businesses, and government, however, the for-profit colleges will focus
In this essay Addison made some very strong points in the defense of community colleges of America, but there is one point that Addison didn’t emphasize on, and that is the price point. Addison mentioned price very briefly by stating that community colleges offer “a network of affordable future” (213). I believe if she had made the price of college a pillar of her essay it would have not only made community college a better college experience alternative but also a more affordable one. Community college is sometimes so cheap it is free!
However, it is still an issue for students to cough up that money. The idea of making community college free to any student in America has been a dream for low income students for a while. President Obama’s desire to make the tuition of community college to everyone in the nation would only make it difficult for students to get a free education, limit them to essential resources, and discourage students from applying to four year universities. Granting free community college tuition to incoming freshmen will draw “more students to already crowded community colleges”. Along with the overcrowded campuses, a very long waiting list will soon form making it just as competitive to get into a four year university.
