ipl-logo

Why Was Julius Caesar Wrong

262 Words2 Pages
Why Julius Caesar’s Assination Was Wrong In Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Caesar is assassinated by a group of conspirators in the Roman Senate. I believe Caesar was wrongfully killed because he had only helped Rome’s rise to power and had not yet committed any crimes against the Roman people. Also, Caesar would not have died if Cassius hadn’t written those false letters to Brutus (2.1, 48-50). Julius Caesar was a powerful military commander and leader of Rome who brought the country more wealth and power. His striking ambition and growing power worried some Senators, who feared he would become an overpowering Roman king. Although Caesar claimed to be a dictator, he never abused his power. At the time, he had only used his passion
Show More
Related
591 Words | 3 Pages

The documents we have prove that Cassius took part in the murder of Julius. In document d we found that the same eye witness that placed Brutus at the scene also placed Cassius at the scene which means there is a good chance that Cassius took place in the murder. We also found in document d that an eyewitness said that Cassius was directly involved in Caesar’s death. In document a we saw a newspaper that told us that Julius was famous in the lower class because he gave people in the lower class money after a recent war now it was clear that Cassius was jealous of Julius and we know this because Cassius said “This is an obvious case of bribery.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesars actions were okay because everything he did was for the good of his country. If he committed a crime, it was to help Rome expand or get more money, I know this because Rome became richer and bigger. But if you're gonna do something bad and think you're helping out, think about the consequences. Caesars actions were justified when he tried to murder Vercingétorix, he committed adultery with Cleopatra, and took over countries to expand land. Julius Caesar almost broke the law when he wanted to kill Vercingétorix.

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

Julius Caesar did not govern fairly. I believe this because it seems like war and power were the only things this dictator wanted. For example, in "The rise of Julius Caesar" by Hal Marcovitz, it says "Caesar's ploy was not much of a gamble. His army easily swept aside his enemies, including his one-time ally, Pompey." This states that yes, Caesar was insanely strong and powerful, but getting rid of his one-time ally because he was supposedly in his way shows that he is not governing fair.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

As time went on Caesar began to develop more power over the years. Caesar made his way to praetorship by 62 BC and many of the senate felt he was a dangerous, ambitious man. Like Abraham Lincoln, Julius Caesar began to have more enemies once he started getting more power. With the amount of power

Read More
1473 Words | 6 Pages

In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

The conspiracy “Et tu, Brute?” were Julius Caesar's last words when he realized his best friend and other men that he thought were standing with him conspired to murder him. Were Brutus' reasons enough to murder or did he take the easy way out? Was Julius really a terrible person or was everyone around him threatened by his power? Why when you google or ask about Julius Caesar he is talked about like one of the most powerful leaders of rome, but his friends thought he was terrible enough to murder him? Did he ever do anything evil or was it just jealousy?

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

I came, I saw, I conquered! Skylin Kinkead Skylin Kinkead Mrs. Samson English 10 5 May, 2017 Essay Was Caesar really a bad man? He had great qualities to be a leader, but the conspirators had a great reason to kill Caesar.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was a political and military leader whose reign marked the beginning of the Roman Empire and the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar did not always follow the law to get the power that he obtained. Caesar once stated, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power; in all other cases, observe it.” If Caesar saw a way to get power, he took the opportunity even if it meant breaching the law.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

Some playwrights choose to write plays about historical events, among them there is The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play that describes the downfall of the rule of Julius Caesar, but is also a play that is not as truthful as it first impressionably is, a complete truthful account of Julius Caesar’s assassination and the events leading up to it. In order to greater attract the audience, Shakespeare, along with other playwrights, relied on adding historical inaccuracies to add the necessary suspense. Thus, Shakespeare strayed away from historical events occurring during Caesar’s lifetime, implementing inaccuracy into the story. Shakespeare based one of his most well-known plays, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, on historical events that includes

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

I think that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered for the fact that he had a different view than other people. In (act II,scene 1,line 32-34) the text says “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg which,hatched,would as his kind grow mischievous and kill him in the shell.” This text is saying that he is evil and should be killed. Conspirators should not have killed Caesar. Just because someone has different views and opinions that you don't like you can't murder them for that.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Considering Caesar’s approval surrounded by the senate, it gave him a copious number of enemies because other politicians were jealous of the number of things that he had accomplished in the republic. He also gave former enemies, ones he had previously conquered, positions in government. Some of these positions included the senate. This was ultimately the biggest mistake during his reign due to the fact that, these people conducted the assassination plot for

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the person most responsible for the death of Julius Caesar is Cassius, he started the conspiracy and developed the plan of how to manipulate and convince Brutus to kill Caesar and lead Rome. While it may look like Brutus was the one responsible for his death, it was Cassius who made him think that he needed to that by slipping fake letters into his room. Cassius began the rebellion against Caesar, and then developed a plan to make Brutus think he need to kill Caesar and become the leader, and finally as well as the other conspirators, Cassius contributed to stabbing Caesar. TS 1: in the beginning of the story we are introduced to the conspirators, who are lead by Cassius and we discover that they are determined to destroy Caesar. In the beginning of the play Cassius is trying to convince Brutus that there is nothing special about Caesar, he is “Like a Colossus, and [they] petty men Walk under his huge legs”(I, II, 137).

Read More

More about Why Was Julius Caesar Wrong

Related Topics

Open Document