In Nicholas Carr’s article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr talks about the many issues he believes are stemming from using online search engines and Google in general. This article was written back in 2016 and published into The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings. Carr discusses his view on the whole idea of online readings and most of the information available to the world being viewed online through a search engine like Google. He also goes into thorough detail explaining how he believes that technology is becoming more advanced and smarter than its creators. In Carr’s article, he will explain all that he believes is wrong with technology in today’s society and how dumbed down it has made us.
In his article, Is Google Making Us Stupid?, the author Nicholas Carr describes the many ways the use of search engines have on our comprehension. He writes, “The more they use the Web , the more they have to fight to focused on long pieces of writing”(Carr). Most people who often searched the Web, limit themselves from actually learning. For example, googling questions to find answers quicker than actually reading the text limits one's knowledge. Maryanne Wolf, a Tufts University cognitive neuroscientist also stated that search engines is affecting the way we read and write.
Nicolas Carr writes in his essay ‘a few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I've got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after'. Mr. Carr is telling us know that we no longer have to go to a library, spend hours going through card catalogs, or haul piles of books to the table in order to search through thousands of pages of text to find the information we are in search of. Instead, we have places online like Google, Yahoo, and Bing which allow us to sit back and literally, at our fingertips, have any and all information humanly possible on the ready. The days of going through an index in an encyclopedia book, sitting in front of a card catalog, or microfiche are days of the past, extinct if you will. Mr. Carr also writes 'my mind now expects to take in information the way the
In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising. He also argues that the internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the main idea of the author, Nicholas Carr explains that the internet becomes the biggest source of information so it starts to affect our brain in the abilities of read books and other critical thinking. He states that Google being a perfect search engine which is changing the way the people read and write in many ways. Carr says, “research required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can be done in minutes” (Carr 348). The use of internet provides the knowledge efficiency much faster than before. He proves that you can get access to the information by doing a few google searches can give you some quick hyperlinks propel you toward the information.
Is it really Googles fault or is America just lazy? In Nicolas Carr's article "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", he argues that people feel like they cannot read longer articles and books because we now have everything at our fingertips on Google. Is it right to assume that it really is Googles fault when there is not much factual evidence to back that up? The argument that Carr presents to us in his article is problematic in that he provides weak evidence and insufficient assumptions but includes many strong viewpoints from other recognized scholars. A piece of evidence Carr provides is that as a part of a five-year research program from the University College London, "scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors...
In Nicholas Carr's article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" is to inform the younger, upcoming generations on how the Internet may have negative effects on the human mind, in that, the way in which we abuse the Internet and not let our brains figure things out without the need of searching it on Google. Nicholas Carr begins by explaining how he feels that the Internet is causing his focus issues, in which he cannot keep focus while reading a book. Carr has his own personal experiences with the negative effects of the Internet, and he also provides research on how other writers had agreed with him on the subject to help support his strategies of logos. The use of the evidence from the other writers helps to draw in the reader and show them the effects of the Internet. Apparently reading on the Internet doesn't let people read the entire article and it is seen that they go from page to page, losing focus quickly.
“Is Google Making Us Stupid” In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr shows weakness in his information because he makes this an opinionated piece instead of using reliable evidence. First Carr does not support his information well, he simply states his fact and then move over it quickly. He lacks support throughout this entire article making this completely an opinionated article. Instead Carr should focus on finding evidence to support his theory.
Lying in bed that night, Encyclopedia thought about what his mom said about him being a detective when he grows up, but he didn’t want to wait that long. The next morning he thought that he would begin right now. He printed 50 handbills, which he placed in each neighbor’s mail box. After a day of rain, a tiny boy with a pair of rubber boots and a raincoat appeared near the door. Clarence said that Bugs Meany— the leader of the “Tigers” gang— had stolen his tent.
In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid? ” , Nicholas Carr talks about how the internet has affected the way most people process the information that they could found online. The title of the article is the most obvious clue for the argument that he is trying to make. He also points out how internet is our primary source to find the information that we are looking for, but the side effect is affecting our basic ability to read long pieces of information such as books. Google is a well-known website that allows to anyone instant access to kind of information, which can be really helpful if the user knows how to use and manipulate it.
In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” I disagree that his use of support doesn’t work to make his point in this essay because it is too biased. Carr’s article shows a lot of support to his hate towards the internet by quoting himself along with his other fellow writers who are a part of an older generation like Carr himself and only includes one study from University College London. Carr mainly focuses on his anecdotes to help support his essay which really doesn’t give the audience actual information, although he makes a compelling point that Google or the internet itself is making us stupid, but what Carr has not included was any evidence about the good parts about the internet. What Carr was lacking in his essay was that
The rise of the technological age has brought to pass the downfall of mindful and comprehensive reading. At least this is what Nicholas Carr believes, as stated in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”. He argues that because of the golden age of computers, in depth reading no longer occurs to the extent that it once did. According to Carr, people now simply skim and skip over articles instead of actually reading them in depth. Carr constructs his credibility by having a prestigious background, and citing academic sources.
Using Wikipedia let alone is an untrustworthy website, which may have the reader's question Grays reasonings. Using the website citation in this way formed a disadvantageous
There are several trivial mistakes, including entries not being in alphabetical order and the unfortunate oversight of the page being titled incorrectly as “Work Cited” instead of “Works Cited” (Aaron 445). Formatting blunders include the omission of access dates on the two undated web sources (Aaron 469) and the entry for Sean Posey’s article “A Country Walking Dead: The Zombie as Metaphor in American Culture and Film” as the publisher and the website title are the same (Aaron 468). The film that is included on the works-cited page, Doc of the Dead, is listed as though the author saw the film in a theater, which seems unlikely as the documentary was released two years prior to the date of the essay. Of the six sources listed on Student’s Works Cited page, three are used incorrectly, and one newspaper article authored by Rick Allen is recorded despite not being referenced in the essay. Student’s essay seems to rely heavily on the two remaining sources, the Doc of the Dead documentary film and Sean Posey’s article for The Hampton Institute.
However, citation of Wikipedia may be considered unreliable, because educators do not consider Wikipedia an authoritative source. This is because anyone can edit the information given at any time, and although most errors are quickly fixed, some errors go unnoticed. A writer must be careful when using wikipedia and be sure to cross check the information with a more credible source. Chinua Achebe Quotes (Author of Things Fall Apart).
