Endangered Species Act Essays

Endangered Species Act Throughout history, there have been many species that have passed through our planet, earth. Some have survived for millions and millions of years, and others… well, they weren’t so lucky. According to Biologicaldiversity.org, many scientists believe that as of now, “our planet is now in the midst of its sixth mass extinction of plants and animals.” Many scientist claim that species are dying out at 1,000 to 10,000 times the normal rate (the normal rate being 5-6 species per

The Endangered Species Act is one of the most important acts the United States has created. Established in 1973 (Google) the purpose of the ESA was to provide conservation for species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or a significant portion of their range, and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend (NOAA). Which is supposed to mean that they act preserves and protects those species in need, however the ESA is not in fact accomplishing that. The ESA is, in some ways

The Endangered Species Act of 1973, otherwise known as The ESA, was amended on December 28th, 1973 after the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 was repealed. Prior to the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966 was in place. The purpose of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is to protect species that are endangered and to protect the environment and ecosystems in which these species live. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 was first introduced

Under the act if a private land was devastated as a critical habitat for threatened or endangered species and takes a 50% hit on market value than the property owner would be able to receive 150% of the fair market value of the property. (Primo, 2014, p.11) Previous reforms had one thing in common, to improve how the ESA handles endangered species on private land. Private landowners are the key to the ESA to achieving its full potential. Over 75% of endangered and threatened species can be found

About 16,000 species of all 40,000 species in the world are endangered. This has a big problem which the Endangered Species Act has tried to resolve. So far the act has made laws, national parks, and protected areas to prevent animals from going into extinction. With all these actions, animals are still at risk of getting extinct. Are they doing enough? The Endangered Species Act should do more to save animals from extinction because about half of all species are endangered. First, too many

The Endangered Species Act was passed into law on December 28, 1973, the act was designed to conserve and save threatened plants, animals, and their habitats. The Endangered Species Act is widely supported, and around 87% of Americans agree that the act is a successful way to keep endangered and threatened animals safe. The act has numerous positive effects on plant, and animal life, these positive effects are saving endangered and threatened species, preserving their ecosystem, and protecting plants

chose was the Endangered Species Act. The Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1973, with the intention of protecting and recovering at risk species and also protecting the ecosystems the species are dependent on. According to Congress, the goal of the legislation was to “ provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved, to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species” (U.S. Fish

“Between 40%-50% of endangered species in the U.S. are improving or stable, but the others are moving toward extinction. While the law has driven the rebirth of 36 species, a similar number have disappeared.” Lions, tigers, and are just some of the animals, that have been threatened,but thanks to organizations such as WWF,(The World Wildlife Organization), many of these species have been rising in numbers. But one of the hot issues in world today is if the Endangered species act is doing an efficient

Ever wondered how to save species from becoming extinct? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) wanted to protect endangered species from becoming extinct, and with the help of the congress they passed an act. The act was then called The Endangered Species Conservation Act. It allowed the act to provide additional protection to species in danger. The Endangered Species Act protects the endangered species or the ones likely to become extinct. This act has given animals and plants a certain amount

started with the ‘popular’ endangered species. The endangerment and small population of these species finally sparked a need in humans to do something about it. That is how the Endangered Species Act was finally initiated. However, as much good as the act has done, it has a major flaw that needs to be brought up and solved. Endangered species are going extinct at a much higher rate because the Endangered Species Act takes too long to go into effect. “More than 40 species have gone extinct while waiting

currently threatened species are at risk because of human activities, mainly due or habitat loss, introduction of exotic species or global warming. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) plans to change this. “The ESA was enacted by Congress in 1973. It states that the federal government has the responsibility to protect endangered species, threatened species and critical habitats. The ESA has a list to protect plants and animals nationally and worldwide. In 2009 there were 1,361 endangered or threatened plants

extinction, that was until The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was introduced and saved the Bald Eagle. The Endangered Species Act was established 1973, it has protected more than 2000 species in danger of extinction across the United States. The ESA is used to protect wildlife species and plants in danger of extinction. It is administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service along with the National Marine Fisheries Service. Controversy surrounds the endangered species act because it set aside certain human

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Wild Lands Policy regulated and run by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are two different government actions taken to ensure the safety and preservation of plants, animals and the environment they live in. These policies should not be controversial but making everyone happy is an impossible job especially when the federal government is involved. Environmentalist and Citizens who feel the government is overreaching both have their positions and both are

The Endangered Species Act, frequently referred to as the “pit-bull” of environmental law, has been a catalyst for conflict since its enactment in 1973. Endangered and threatened species, such as the Northern Spotted Owl and the Preble Meadow Jumping Mouse, have historically caused a great deal of conflict between the government and large developers. However, little attention has been given to the ongoing conflicts between smaller, private landowners and the government, resulting from the regulatory

become unsupportive of the law. Recovery plans are another unsuccessful part of the act. The article “Endangered Species, Endangered Act?” describes the failures of the system. Not every listed species has a plan, and the organisms that do often have outdated or deficient ones. The blueprints are usually vague and ineffective. Many of the descriptions don’t state whether a federal action would be harmful to a species. Also, the plans sometimes

Summary One of the oldest Acts of legislation to influence conservation is the Multiple Use and Sustained Yield Act of 1960. Land management on national forests is overseen by this act where lands are “administered for outdoor recreation, range, timber, watershed, and wildlife and fish purposes.” People felt it was needed so one use was not treated with emphasis (such as timber production and harvest) while others were treated with ignorance. Resources and activities are treated with equality within

know that 100-1000 species of organisms go extinct on average every year? Many species of animals and even plants are going extinct due to habitat loss and poaching. The Endangered Species Act was created to help those species, but people often say it is misused, and others believe that it can actually help endangered species gain back population. While the Endangered Species Act has been misused in a lot of ways, it should be maintained because species are becoming endangered for many reasons, such

reference to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The pond located on Betty Blackacre’s property was deemed as a major migratory location for many birds, including endangered species. Section 9 of the ESA bars the taking of a species. In this instance, the term “take” encompasses any harm of an endangered species or its habitat (Laschever, 2012). This is directly applicable to the land included in the order. Donald’s industrial park would inevitably affect the environment of the endangered birds. Even though

either species die out due to being hunted by the other? Trophy hunting should be illegal. It should be illegal because it can be harmful to endangered and these species should be protected properly. Not to mention it can be a cruel form of hunting and a cruel death. To begin with, trophy hunting should not be legal because these animals should be protected. In fact, the New York Times article states that the Obama Administration has placed lions in Africa under the protection of the Endangered Species

surprising amount of species have been completely wiped out directly from human interaction in recent history. One interesting example would be the California grizzly bear that ironically is completely extinct in California. According to the California State Library website, the California grizzly bear or Ursus Californicus became the official State Animal in 1953 after being extinct for nearly 20 years and is the centerpiece on the California flag. Extinction, the elimination of a species, is a normal process