High-stakes testing Essays

Testing and schools go hand in hand, and they generally have a positive impact. High stakes testing has become vital for public schools; consequently, high-stakes testing has risen and spread like a bad case of the flu.[PP3] High stakes testing is detrimental to American education due to the accountability, course favoritism, and negative attitude it brings to school systems. A major creditor to the evolution of high stakes testing is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was enacted

use existing international and Australian literature on student’s experience of high stakes testing to support their research to answer the question ‘is high-stakes testing in the best interest of students?’ The reoccurring theme throughout the review is the negative impact that high-stakes testing has on the health and wellbeing of students. The review draws attention to existing research that suggests high-stakes testing lowers the self esteem, self image and long term confidence of students, causing

Are high stakes testing results appropriate indicators of success for students in special education? According to the article, special education students do not perform well on assessments. No Child Left Behind and IDEA hold students in special education accountable for their results on high stakes testing like never before. Increase in complexity of tests has made it difficult for students in special education to have success. This article is targeted toward all educators as well as administrators

Hi, Nicole I was enjoying reading your post for this week. High-stakes testing is one of the biggest stressors in the education field. It’s a huge weight we bear every day. Although I am not full time in a single classroom, high-stakes testing worries me greatly. It is not fair to teachers or students to constantly stress about teaching or learning to the test. We try to fit all of our students into this box knowing for sure that our students’ abilities range vastly. The opt-out option has brought

These kids may not be able to get into a university as they lacked the crucial help and resources to not only pass the test but score as high as the students who have the edge to prepare better. My question is why are American school systems are relying so much on one test to defy a student’s grade or future? Studies have shown that high stake testing like the SAT’s, have cut down on different ethnicities getting into colleges. According an article written by Rebecca Zwick, At the

I agree high stakes testing has an impact how we teach our curriculum, even in the military environment. We use high stakes testing for promotion to the next pay grade in our enlisted ranks. As educators, our primary goal should be developing curriculum and assessment procedures that improve learning outcomes for our students instead of deterring them. Test like high-stakes actual deters student learning. Amrein & Berliner (2002) suggest, the No Child Left Behind Act high stakes testing policy has

From a student and teacher standpoint, I think that there is way too much emphasis on high stakes testing. All year you hear teachers say “You’re going to need to know this when you take the FSA”. It is insane how much you hear about these types of test, even at the beginning of the school year. Another bad thing about high stakes testing is that teachers only worry about these forms of test. Throughout the year, teachers forget about teaching the material and worry about teaching to the test.

High-stakes testing has been a popular topic among the education world. It has sparked numerous debates, prompted state-wide changes, and revitalized school districts. This concept has created controversy, but the definition and goal has remained the same. High-stakes testing is a test designed to measure student achievement after a period of instruction has been completed (Kubiszyn and Borich, 2013, p.22). Critics of high states testing believe it results to the teaching of the test rather than

Discussion Post- Chapter 7- High stakes testing Claim: High stakes testing is an extremely problematic political issue within the education system because it holds all students to the same standards regardless of disabilities or disadvantages, it encourages educators to teach strictly on information that relates to the tests, and it can have major consequences for schools across the country that are unable to make Adequete Yearly Progress (AYP). Evidence: The Learning to Teach Edition Nine textbook

some form of high stakes testing for many years, the SAT, ACT, AP, and so on. Testing in this form was used to measure how much a student had learned and retained over the course of a student’s education. However, over time the testing focus changed. High stakes testing morphed from a useful tool that gauges achievement to becoming the primary focus in education. The focus is no longer about what the child has achieved, instead the emphasis is on achieving top scores. High stakes testing effects education

High-stakes testing is a form of testing that came about after the No Child Left Behind Act, or NCLB. High stakes tests are defined as the summative test or assessment designed to measure student achievement to make decisions that are of prominent educational, financial or social impact. (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2013) The concept of high stakes test is to determine and account for several factors such as whether a student will be promoted to the next grade or if a student will receive a high school

shields No Child Left Behind from criticism and political fallout. It is difficult to discuss the initiative’s shortcomings without coming across as entirely against high academic achievement, particularly for traditionally underachieving students. Nonetheless, No Child Left Behind’s legacy of accountability through high stakes testing is disastrous and has completely altered the trajectory of American public education. Of course I agree that all teachers in public education should be highly effective

High-stakes testing is something most people have experienced; however, the stigma around the testing has changed drastically within the last twenty years. Becoming more popular with the push to become smarter as a nation, high-stakes testing has become a kind of epidemic across the land. High stakes testing is detrimental to the future of United States education due to how it has become all-encompassing in schools, how accountable it makes a single test, and how the actual effects stray from the

Association (AEA) in taking a strong stance on the deleterious effects of high stakes testing, especially going so far as to promulgate their reasons and concerns. It is obvious from the statement that the AEA supports the importance of testing and accountability in improving education, but finds the current testing manipulation environment to be harmful for any positive improvements in education. Specifically, how the monolithic testing focus has increased dropout rates, created cultural insensitivity,

I believe this article in asking the question; Are High-Stakes Tests punishing some students is a valid issue. A high percentage of students who are failing these standardized tests are from poor, low-income, ethnic, racial minority and special education students. Here are some specific tests and results. The ACLU of Massachusetts states the testing gap punishes the poor, and ethnic minority the most. There is a testing gap between rich and poor communities. About 65 percent of students in low-income

I have a hard time seeing the value in high-stakes testing, although they may contribute data and performance levels, I think it’s hard to say whether or not the data is reliable. The first thing I think of when it comes to testing is how detrimental it can be for students. For a majority of students who may struggle in school, or are bad test takers, testing can greatly effect their self esteem. I also think testing takes away from the fun of school, teachers are and sort of have to spend more

of High-Stakes Testing Towards Students' Skills and Mental Health High-stakes testing has become a widely used method to assess students' skills and compare their academic abilities. These tests refer to assessments or exams that have significant consequences for students in educational systems. These tests typically carry high stakes because they heavily influence important decisions, such as student promotion, graduation, college admissions, or school funding. Although high-stakes testing provides

is aligned to meet high-stake testing requirements. The National Education Association reported 72% of teacher felt “moderate” or “extreme” pressure from schools and their district to better student test score in order to get funding from the federal government (Barth, 2006). Therefore, this indicates that the teacher has little or no influence on what their student loan, as a result, this has impacted the classroom learning environment negatively. Moreover, high stake testing has force teachers

\Cizek, (2022), argues that high stakes testing has led to a "cultural shift in education, from a focus on teaching and learning to a focus on testing and accountability". He suggests that this shift has been detrimental to both teachers and students, as it has reduced the flexibility and creativity of instruction and led to a greater emphasis on rote memorization. Researcher reported that an assessment method that is used to make important decisions about students, teachers, and schools. They indicated

Testing students with disabilities or special needs can be difficult. High-stakes testing causes the biggest issue for these students. Students with disabilities are provided services based on their needs as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (Lee, n.d.). Accommodations, which are changes in the administration of the test, are sometimes provided as services to students with disabilities to level the playing field between them and their nondisabled peers (Gilbertson