ipl-logo

• Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

641 Words3 Pages

In December of 1787, the first state had ratified the Constitution. Causing not only the adoption of the Constitution, but also the division of the people in states into two separate groups; the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists being the ones who supported the Constitution and the Anti-Federalists who did not support the Constitution. Although there were those who did not approve of the Constitution, today, the document is the entire framework for our government and our laws. The Federalists, those who supported a "federal" system of state governments guided by a strong national government. With the help of George Washington and James Madison, the Federalists planned out a union that promoted a successful mixed economy made up of agriculture, manufacturing, strong central banking system, and more. This group becoming one of which that helped create the two-party political system. Although …show more content…

This group wasn't as organized as the Federalists, but they did, however, have a clear reason as to why they opposed it. This group thought that the Constitution would bring them all back to life under Great Britain, they wanted the power to be within the local and state governments. Stating that the three branches of government threatened their traditional belief in preventing government power. One leader and avid opposer of the Constitution was the Governor of New York at the time, George Clinton, and New York being a powerful state, he didn't want the government to have any of that power because of the document. The group also disliked the electoral system that would alway favor the elite leaders and not the common people. Although this group had valid reasons as to why they did not favor the Constitution, they had to alternative to the document. The Anti-Federalists preferred to be governed under the Articles of Confederation and let the states control their own

Show More
Related
827 Words | 4 Pages

These people were known as the Anti-federalist and wrote their own essays as to what they believed, they also looked more to the Articles of Confederation because it did not look at the central government as much. On the other hand, the Federalist approved of the central government and are a strong supporter of the Constitution. The Federalist papers overall created and unified our government, because without the separation of powers we would not have a strong government because every state will act as their own. At the end once the ratification of the

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

The Anti Federalists didn’t want what we have now,they didn’t want the federal government to have and influence over citizens’ lives, they didn’t want the govt to in any way resemble a monarchy because they had just escaped from the corrupt monarchy. They believed that if the power in the country occupied in the people of the various states, then their vision would have a chance of success. Likewise, the Anti Federalist thought there was no bill of rights, so they disliked the constitution. Every constitution should have one for the people, and the government shouldn’t refuse to give on, as shown on Document E. The Letter to James Madison, Objections to the Constitution was written by Thomas Jefferson to explain what he disliked about the constitution to one of the writings, after the constitution was drafted and were awaiting ratification. Thomas Jefferson also asserts that he doesn’t like the fact that there is no rules and regulations in regard to office terms, and how the officers could get re-elected and serve for like, thus, will result with corruption

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists favored strong central government putting more faith in the government instead of the people they were supposed to represent. The federalists were also in favor of the elite and allying closely with the British. Hamilton still admired British culture even after he fought for American independence from the British. The Federalists were also in favor of regulations for entrepreneurs, unlike the Jeffersonians who were in favor of being free of intrusive government regulations. The Federalists were also in favor of integrating the United States into the global economy to further the industrial industry.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

They believed in three branches of power, legislative, executive, and judicial. They also stated that there should be separate power between federal and state governments. The political group who did not support the constitution became known as Anti-Federalists. They did not support a central government.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

The debate between the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists significantly impacted the ratification of the Constitution. In the 1780’s, there were two opposing groups: the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for a strong central government and the lack of individual rights. On the other hand, Federalists believed in a strong federal government to maintain order and protect the nation. Both these arguments and discussions led to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which addressed the Anti-Federalists' concerns.

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. Constitution was meant to replaced the Articles of Confederation and provide the people with an insight on all of the rights and for the government to abide by them. However, there were people that did not want the Constitution ratified and there were some who did. The ones who opposed the ratification of the Constitution were referred to as the Antifederalists. They feared that with a strong government, the federal government would have too much power in their hands and would do as they pleased. The Federalists, the ones who supported the Constitution, disagreed with the Anti-Federalists and stated that with a strong federal government, the United States would eventually evolve into a better country in the future.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists favored a strong central government, and favored limiting the state powers, and thought 2 representatives from each was enough. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and put together by the desire for a powerful, centralized government. Their leaders were usually influential men like George Washington & Benjamin Franklin. They were advocates of an orderly, competent government that could protect their economic status.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

Let me start with what Antifederalist are: The Antifederalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. In the approval debate, the Anti-Federalists conflicted the Constitution. Anti-federalists complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Many people were unhappy with the Articles of Confederation and wanted to get rid of it completely while others wanted to change it or keep it. These two groups were called Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalist wanted to get rid of the Constitution while Antifederalists did not. Most people were unhappy because the majority of people were small farmers, landowners and people who were in debt.

Read More
1474 Words | 6 Pages

On September 17, 1787 the Constitution was written. This event is also known as the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists and the Federalists, had different views on the Constitution, the Federalists had wanted the Constitution to be ratified with limited power of the government. Where as the Anti-Federalists had not wanted the Constitution to be ratified and wanted a compromise for this problem. For this conflict to have a compromise this is where the Bill of Rights came in.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The federalists believed in a national bank while the democratic republicans thought the better solution was many state banks. The federalists party was lead by Alexander Hamilton and the republicans by Thomas jefferson. These were the first political parties in the new country. The federalists wanted to have a national bank runned by the government.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

History is fraught with examples of governments and principles which, in their infancy, were unable to escape controversy and therefore have become the subjects of much political and academic discourse. The Constitutional Convention, convened by the early United States in 1786, is one such example of this phenomena. With two distinct sides arguing very different point, the Constitutional Convention set the stage whereby the longest-lasting written government in the history of the earth would be both drafted and implemented. The Constitutional Convention balanced the desires of both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists in order to draft, amend, and ratify the Constitution of the United States of America.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

the federalists favored strong, centralized government. They advocated regulation or foreign trade and interstate trade, because for some reason they did not like that. The federalists created national bank that favored more the businessman in the north than in the south, yet they promoted industry and manufacturing. Next, the republicans ideas and in

Read More

More about • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

Related Topics

Open Document