Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments on abortion
Arguments against abortion debate
Arguments against abortion debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments on abortion
Arguments against abortion debate
Arguments against abortion debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Amber Buchanan is a 17 year old white American who affiliates herself as a Democrat. She is in her first semester of college. She lives with her mom and two sisters; her mom is her biggest influence and someone she looks up to. Amber’s family is part of the working middle class.
Reconstruction Since abortion is the epitome of a controversy topic, it often instigates passionate debates. In Judith Jarvis Thomson's "Defense of Abortion", she provides a pro-choice perspective. Her standpoint centralizes on evaluating the situation independently as opposed to gaging the cases in a black and white manner. Through rather outlandish depictions such as the violinist, she delineates a thought-provoking scenario for her arguments.
Philippa Foot on Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect In an argumentative essay written by Philippa Foot, the doctrine of the double effect is challenged, with respect to the moral permissibility of abortion. To clarify, the doctrine of the double effect is the view that sometimes harm is foreseen however not intended. Although Foot believes the doctrine to be important, she still rejects it—“…arguments in favour of the doctrine of the double effect…but I now believe that the conflict should be solved in another way” (Foot, 7). She proposes instead “alternative distinctions to be drawn” for the problem of abortion—such, positive versus negative rights.
Through Cross’s article “Abortion in Canada: Legal but Not Accessible”, I will discuss the conflicts of abortion that range across Canada and how it can lead to the reduction of women’s rights and consequently cause harm to a woman’s mental health. I also follow Cross’s example of self-proclamation of pro-choice movements in YWCA and women’s empowerment to ensure a positive attitude towards women’s health. Canada is currently one of very few countries where no legal restrictions on abortions exist today. Since the first criminal law against abortion was enacted within Canada in 1869, regulations and accessibility to abortion have undergone serious changes (Cross 3). Today, the rights and morality of a woman who access abortions are brought into question in both educational and political thought in our nation, since the topic is complex in the nature of a woman’s body, it is in deep importance of Canadian history and current politics relating to sexuality.
Judith Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion is an article defending abortion on the grounds of rights, duties, and justice. Thomson uses various thought experiments to represent different circumstances surrounding a pregnancy and the permissibility of abortion in these circumstances. One such thought experiment that she uses in her argument is the burglar example. If you open a window and a burglar climbs into your house, anti-abortionists would argue that the burglar has a right to stay in your house and you have a duty to shelter him because you are partially responsible for his presence there. Even if you install bars specifically to keep out burglars and the burglar still manages to break in then you are still partially responsible and he still
In “A Defense of Abortion” Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is not always immoral, even when we assume for the sake of argument that a fetus is an innocent person. In cases of rape and even some cases of protected consensual sex, Thomson says it is not immoral for a woman to kill a fetus by denying it use of her body. There are two pieces to Thompson’s argument. First, she rejects the common assumption that to kill an innocent person is always morally wrong. And she uses a clever counterexample (the violinist) to show that even aside from the case where you would need to kill an innocent person to save your own life, it is not always morally wrong to kill someone by denying him use of your body when he needs it to live.
In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Thomson argues with a unique approach regarding the topic of abortion. For the purpose of the argument, Thomas agrees to go against her belief and constructs an argument based on the idea that the fetus is a person at conception. She then formulates her arguments concerning that the right to life is not an absolute right. There are certain situations where abortion is morally permissible. She believes that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the right for the woman to control what happens to her own body.
The permissibility of abortion is a topic of popular debate. The discussions presented by Judith Jarvis Thomson and Rosalind Hursthouse provide two unique viewpoints on the matter. In her essay “A Defense of Abortion”, Thomson presents an argument for the moral permissibility of abortion even if the fetus is granted the right to life, and provides the famous violinist scenario, to illustrate that the right to life does not come with the right to use someone else’s body in order to survive. On the other hand, in the chapter “Women's Rights and Wrongs”, Hursthouse focuses on the concept of virtue and how it applies to the decision to have an abortion. Hursthouse believes Thomson fails to address ways in which abortion is permissible because she
Trysten Lay, Mr. C.D. Writing 121 20 May 2024 The Topic of Abortion In the United States, the topic of Abortion divides all people of different values, beliefs and religion. Regarding abortion, the line that separates us most is commonly found in whether or not the fetus is just a clump of cells, an actual life, or both. I believe that even if a fetus is just a clump of cells, it is still wrong to have an abortion. The first source defending my argument is by Mary Anne Warren, in her article “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion’’.
In the article The Rights of a Woman Do Not Outweigh the Rights of a Child, it informs many women with true information about abortion. It quotes, “What is at stake in abortion is the mother’s lifestyle, as opposed to the baby’s life.” By becoming a pregnant woman they have to choice for themselves and the baby. The information this article gives woman is explaining how abortion affects babies not just them. However, abortion is a lifetime decision, “ In nearly all abortions, the woman’s right to live is not an issue, because her life is not in danger.”
Most abortion arguments discussed today revolve around the premise that a fetus is a human being at conception. In Judith Thomson’s essay, “A Defense to Abortion”, she argues on the topic of abortions. She defends the mother’s right to choose what happens to her body on the assumption that a baby becomes a human at conception. In the argument, she gives the famous Violinist analogy. I will argue in this essay that her argumentative analogy is not sound because of the difference in social importance.
Introduction: Bob Buckhorn had said "When you start talking about abortion, people take that seriously and they're passionate about it - on both sides." For the past 28 years abortion has been in the grey matter of the legal system, neither illegal nor legal, yet it still remains one of the biggest debated issues in Canadian society today that is separated into two categories: pro choice and pro life. According to Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context, pro-life supporters claim that life begins at conception, therefore, abortion at any stage in the pregnancy is murder. They believe that life is valuable and the life of the unborn baby has the same rights as the mother. Pro-choice supporters, on the other hand, claim that it is the woman’s right
Abortion has always been one of the most controversial topics throughout the world. Michael Tooley wrote an article called “Abortion and Infanticide” which consisted of his arguments on the topic. Premise one states that “rights secure for individuals things that we desire.” In this premise, Tooley is arguing that if you desire to have something, then others cannot step in and remove that something from you. For example, if I wanted to have an abortion, Tooley argues that nobody should be able to step in and deprive me from wanting to have that abortion.
Annotated Bibliography "Abortion ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2016.
“Abortion -should it be a right of every woman in the present context- A critical analysis” 1. Introduction I elected to present my dissertation on a topic based on ‘abortion’ since it is a hidden social menace in our society. It is like an iceberg. The tip represents the reported abortions, which everyone sees.