A Rhetorical Analysis Of Gandhi's Speech

851 Words4 Pages

that violence just leads to more violence which makes the situation in question go nowhere. A well-known activist that was leader of the Indian independence movement during the time of British rule was Mahatma Gandhi who solidly supported non-violence throughout his campaigns. In the speech, Quit India, delivered in August 8, 1942, Mahatma Gandhi gives his outlook on the path the nation should take in regards of the political situation of India. Gandhi is able to influence his audience through the use of rhetorical devices by applying hyperbole, metaphor, and religion in order to encourage the people of India to peacefully revolt against the British in an effort to obtain their independence. Initially, Gandhi integrates hyperbole showing that not only does he have a great amount of emotions he wants to share out, but that he is not ashamed to express how he is really feeling. In the Quit India speech, Mahatma Gandhi states, “There is so much in my heart that I would like to pour out before this …show more content…

In paragraph 7 of the Quit India discourse, Mahatma Gandhi proclaims that God will have let him know that he did not do good if he does not use the gift the greater power has given him in the middle of the conflagration. An appeal to the feelings of the audience is used to invoke emotion upon individuals that are devout. People that are religiously committed will understand him and support him. It will unite all of whom believe in a greater power and convince them to do the same as Gandhi. Last but certainly not least, Mahatma Gandhi enhances his ethos as a result of showing good will and human character. He wields his image to share that with him in Congress they will no longer wait for freedom. Gandhi accounts the events happening in India as unacceptable to where the understanding of the crowd is that they must urgently take action into their own