Abstinence Of Self-Worth Values In The Classroom

Moreover, teaching tactics offer a significant impact on education. It is fundamental that instructors will have an effect on student learning (Jeffries, 183). Therefore, it is best when instructors share beliefs similar to those of the sex Ed program which they teach. And when the majority of educators prefer CSE over its competitor, AOE, this marks a benefit for CSE. By providing truthful explanations to sexuality education, along with necessary morals and values to navigate situations, CSE instructors encourage students to analyze and perform safe sexual choices. While they assert that abstinence is the safest choice when it comes to sex, they likewise understand that many youths will give in to the temptation of sexual activities. So they

It does not work to impose societal expectations, such as remaining entirely abstinent until marriage, on teenagers; therefore, CSE instructors use personal expectations. Personal expectations are based on what the student feels is right; they are values the student determines for themselves based on information they have learned (Helmich, 13). The belief is that there should be no shame attached to normal human curiosity when it comes sex and masturbation (Lesko, 287). And when teenagers are peer pressured into sexual situations, they should draw upon their self-worth and values in order to properly decide. In general, CSE uses evidence based material to properly instruct students in the perils and joys of all that is human

The moralistic values and practices of AOE have caught the attention of countless officials, parents, and students (Gabrion, 9). The absolute surety offered by abstinence is quite enticing; there is no chance of STIs or any negative emotions which would result from premarital sex. This truth, and the belief that adolescents cannot be trusted with the overwhelming possibilities safer-sex proposes, has been the integrity of AOE supporters (Zeiler, 374). Certain groups of people believe that CSE enables the students to engage in sexual experiences prematurely by offering undesirable options such as masturbation, contraceptives, and abortion along with other alternatives. However these concerns are unfounded. As previously stated, CSE programs have not been cited to increase nor provoke sexual activity (“What the Research Says... Comprehensive Sex Education.”, 1). However, AOE has been accused of various offenses as a sexuality education program. Chiefly, AOE quotes medically inaccurate data when discussing condom failure rates (Stranger-Hall, 9). According to William L. Jeffries, “... federal law explicitly forbids schools receiving AOE funding to teach about contraceptive methods, except to emphasize their failure rates” (172). And much valuable information it omits altogether. There is no mention of numerous contraception methods. Sexual orientation and gender identity are deemed