Fraenkel’s argument have some sensible points especially where he point outs if we are able to put aside our perceptive aside, we will be able to actually engage in this type of culture debate. He calls it being fallibilitist, which is liable for err, he state that “if you are a fallibilist you can see why valuing the truth and valuing a culture of debate are related.” He wants to move away from that way so we can have time to examine our self and perspectives and implies that the debate offers that environment. Franekels is careful on the way to propose the way we should face our fallibities by stating we shouldn’t travel to Cairo like he did, but he does make a logical appeal by saying if we go through some sort of disturbing experience that