They were sent to Lexington, to destroy the militia stash of weapons. Why would the militia, who weren’t even sure of the British’s journey to their town fire first? The British were on the offensive, “...and upon their sudden approach, I immediately ordered our Militia to disperse and not to fire. Immediately said Troops made their appearance, and rushed furiously, fired upon and killed eight of our party without receiving any provocation therefor from us.” -Captain
But they were surely waiting for them. The reason for the battle is due Britain had heard that the colonist was preparing for a fight. Due to the differences they had with the regulations of Britain Battle of Lexington (Battle of Lexington, 1). The battle started the American Revolution Battle of Lexington. Congress drafted a
Fire, damn you! Suddenly the line of British muskets exploded to flame…” Then he Battle of concord on page 278 it stated, “Suddenly there was a burst of fire, and it was not the rebel’s nit was Laurie’s’ men… The rebels fired a second time with more precision still, but then all order was gone, the scene engulfed in vast fog, shouts and screams blending with hard pops and chatter of the muskets. Too many still moving away, pursued by their own shock, the awful horror of the unexpected, leaving their own dead and wounded behind.”
The battles of Lexington and Concord were the very first battles of the revolutionary war. on april 19 great Britain's general gage would send out troops held in boston to make way to lexington where they were supposed to capture leaders Sam Adams and John Hancock. after Lexington they were supposed to go to Concord where they would seize gunpowder. Lexington and concord are both towns that are close to boston Massachusetts. from it being the first battle of the war, it was a victory as the british began to retreat after the gunfire.while 650-900 british troops started marching to concord, they were followed closely by the famous Paul Revere, while he seen that the troops were ready for war, he went back and warned the whole country side
“On April 18, 1775 several hundred British regulars under orders from General Thomas Gage set out from Boston Massachusetts to capture weapons and ammunition being stockpiled by local colonists in the towns of Lexington and Concord” (Nix History.com). In addition to capturing munitions, the British soldiers were ordered to capture Samuel Adams and John Hancock who were wanted for high treason against the crown. Upon arriving at Lexington, the soldiers were met at the town center by numerous armed minutemen. It is not known who fired the first shot, but the colonists were in full retreat after a brief battle leaving left several dead behind. The British continued their journey on to the North Bridge outside Concord.
History Story #1 Battle of Lexington Concord: During the wee hours of April 19 1776, Prescott warned all of the American Colonists to watch up because Prescott shouted, “The regulars are coming watch out, you will get captured and probably killed if you do nothing about it and just stay still. So, the American Colonists evacuated the place and went to a carriage! They had to come back to get the smoked fish which may have not been the best decision.
They delayed the redcoats while the troops in Lexington could move the weapons the redcoats were going after. The battle of Concord was also the first “battle” in the war. The Shot Heard Round the World happened at Concord which was the shot that truly launched the Revolutionary War. A shot from one of the sides was fired against orders which started the battle and the
The American Revolution: Battles of Lexington and Concord Jaydon Yancey P.2A 12/1/2015 Abstract The battles of Lexington and Concord were very important to the Revolutionary War. Those battles showed just how small the colonists were compared to the Europeans. The www.history.com staff (2009) stated that there were 700 British troops compared to a measly 77 militiamen .They
Supporting Paragraph On April 19th, 1775, on Lexington Green, early in the morning, gun fire had broken out between the colonists and British soldiers. This specific battle was one of the first leading up to the Revolutionary war. Being one of the battles leading to the Revolution, it is important for historians to know who had fired the first shot, to this day there are speculations, but nobody knows for sure.
One loud shot was fired, leaving everyone with the question of “who fired first,” The Revolutionary War had begun. The American colonist were unquestionably right in waging war and breaking away from Britain. The colonist no longer wanted to be under Britain's strong mercantilist. Conflict had rose between the mother country and the colonist. The American colonist were justified in waging and breaking away from Britain because of taxes, treatment, and mercantilism.
The battle of Lexington and Concord, the day that caused eight years of fighting and over seventy-thousand deaths, was this day a needed feature in history or could've it been avoided. The time period was rough and america was split three ways, loyalist, patriots, and those who were soon to be tortured until they gave in to patriotism. Britain had recently created new laws and taxes and the colonists were not happy and their corporation with britain soon decreased and their rage inlargened. Even when britain tried to compromise the patriots still refused, and because of this they were the main cause of the war and if it wasn’t for their strict beliefs they war could've been easily avoided. From the Boston Tea party, to the Boston Massacre, the battles of lexington and concord is one
King George III sent 25,000 troops to Massachusetts where the first shot was fired and the war began. It is unclear which side fired the first shot but the Patriots felt they were merely defending themselves from the cruelty placed upon them by their government. King George III also allowed his troops to enter the homes of the colonies, take from them, and imprison the people without a fair trial or hearing which all went against clear laws and rights of Britain. It is for these reasons that support American Christians and the founding fathers who believe the American Revolution was
The Siege of Boston The Battles of Lexington and Concord sealed the desire of most of the colonies to fully separate from its mother country. As a result, additional rebel militia gathered in New England, 16,000 all of them, and marched towards Boston City in what came to be known as the Siege of Boston. On March 17, 1775, the British and Loyalists evacuated the city and the rebels won. Artillery Expert Back in New York, the Battles in Lexington and Concord demonstrated that there was no peaceful resolution to the conflict between the British and the Patriots.
And at length proceeded on our way to concord which we then learnt was our destination, in order to destroy a magazine of stores there.”. In the Sworn Affidavit by a British Officer named Edward Gould, there was more evidence to support this claim, too. He noted, “...from whence we proceeded to Lexington; on our arrival at that place, we saw a body of provincial troops armed, to the number of about sixty or seventy men; on our approach.”. Both of these selected quotes support the claim. They explain how the British’s departure that day was intended for going to Lexington.
Prior to Kuhn’s 1962, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, Karl Popper and Donald Campbell agreed the existence of specific thought processes derived from the evolutionary theory but, expanded their thinking when determining the scientific method is social (requiring language leading to social interactions which leads to rational endeavors or cognition), according to Wettersten (2016). This advanced from earlier thinking that scientists’ observations were the source of all knowledge (Wettersten). Thomas S. Kant (1962), on the other hand, felt the theories, facts, and methods scientists were compiling were neither historically organized nor were the scientists of a specific field, being educated in a rigorous and rigid manner. Kant believed that normal science problems did not lead to new findings, rather it was addressing only the theoretical side of science (Hacking, 2012) whereby research data was being made to fit in with the existing knowledge. Kant introduces
