Analysis Of While Side A: Are Colleges Eliminate Barriers To Success?

1803 Words8 Pages

Amiss or Astonishing Academies In order for any argument to be dependable, research must take place. Analysis, assessment, and, eventually, judgment. This, however, does not happen until a thorough evaluation of reliable sources takes place on behalf of both sides. In order for this assessment to take place, it's important to dwell on the following question: Are colleges eliminating barriers to success? While Side A believes, yes, that colleges do eliminate barriers to success, the opposition does not share the same perspective. Side B, on the other hand, thinks colleges are continuing to place barriers to success. It's important to explore both sides in order to fully answer the question being debated. According to Webster’s Dictionary, barrier …show more content…

In the United States, colleges were not a common part of education for all students. They were often limited to rich European men or nepotism. The institutions established in the U.S. were also heavily influenced by religion and there were only a few often located in major cities (Thelin et al.). One important point to consider is: Are colleges effectively using scholarships and grants? Side A supports the argument that colleges do effectively use scholarships and grants; crafting a community that is supported and aided in the real world. California Community Colleges is an organization known for the “wide range of financial aid options to help pay for your education.” (“Financial Aid Options”). In addition, colleges also pertain to a large group of people. Joanna Nesbit’s “Guide to College Grants and Scholarships,” highlights the different types of scholarships and how they help lots of different people. Different types of scholarships are “ Academic (for GPA and/or standardized test scores), Geographic diversity, underrepresented (students of color, first, generation, LGTBQ+, …show more content…

All too frequently, such programs are job-creation schemes for their incumbents, and outside interest is actively discouraged. Blacks study blacks, gays study gays, and so forth. Having so many categories results in unsuccessful students because they can't learn new perspectives and ideologies from opposing viewpoints. Another point to consider is: Should colleges use the traditional or standards-based grading system? Side A would argue to continue using the traditional grading system, as it is well established and is currently working well in colleges to provide barrier-breaking success. Traditional grading effectively “motivate[s] some students to do their best and achieve higher academic standards” creating a sense of extrinsic motivation (“Exploring Traditional Grading Systems: Pros, Cons, and Alternatives | Strobel Education”). Additionally, traditional grading “give[s] teachers a way to assess individual performance against the rest of the class” (“Exploring Traditional Grading Systems: Pros, Cons, and Alternatives | Strobel