ipl-logo

Analyze The Differences Between The House Of Representatives And The Senate

1037 Words5 Pages

After the failure of the Articles of Confederation, the young US needed a more centralized, stronger form of government. The US Constitution outlined a very specific government structure which included a bicameral legislature: The House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives and Senate were designed to operate differently to obtain a balanced power through equal representation in each chamber, different responsibilities of each chamber, and the number of terms members in each chamber serve. During the Constitutional Convention, one of the most important decisions would be focused on the structure of Congress. The New Jersey Plan, favoring smaller states, opted for one house with equal representation. In contrast, the Virginia Plan, favoring larger states, opted …show more content…

Only one-third of senators are elected every two years (two-thirds of the senators remain current members). Therefore, the Senate is a ‘continuous body.’ The Senate does not adopt rules every two years but depends more on tradition and precedent when determining procedure”(Oleszek, 2013). The main differences between the U.S. The House and Senate are designed to operate differently to maintain balance and ensure an effective government. The contrast in term length in each chamber is intended to ensure a continuous flow of representation and give each chamber its unique function. The longer terms of the Senate provide stability and continuity, allowing senators to take a longer-term view on issues. However, the shorter terms of the House ensure that members remain closely connected to the emotions and needs of the people they represent. As a result, the House and Senate approach legislative matters with different perspectives, reflecting the framers' intent to have a balance of power in Congress, since these varying flows of opinions can balance each other for an overall better

Show More
Related
339 Words | 2 Pages

So in order to make the branch more equal in power to the others, it is divided into two parts, the House and the Senate. Balance is key to making sure that government keeps itself under control and working for what is in the people’s interest, with

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

In Virginia plan some of the specific powers include, that the national legislature to consent in all situations to which the separate states are unskilled or in which United States consistency may be disturbed by the claim of individual regulation and also assign inferior tribunals. The executive has the power to carry into execution of national laws, and to adverse any legislative act which shall not be passed after wards unless through permission from two third of each branch of national legislature. The judiciary has the power to handle all the circumstances regarding collection of national revenue, impeachment of any state, officers and questions that comprise of national coherence. In New Jersey plan some of the powers that are presented are partially similar to those in Virginia plans but not completely

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

The New Jersey plan gave the plan for a federal rather than a national government giving the congress the power to tax and commerce. Even though the Virginia Plan remained a large part of the convention the states were looking for equal representation. They wanted the upper

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

The three branches would write, enforce, and judge the laws. This part of the New Jersey Plan is the same as the Virginia Plan, except that this plan would have a one house congress. The smaller states liked the idea of a three branch government, but would make

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

The Virginia Plan was an idea to organize two chambers for a legislative branch. Each states would be portrayed by numbers. States with a vast population would win over a small state due to representation. Larger states will most likely find this more optimal than small states because of the community.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

This idea was later used in the Constitution and is part of the United States government. The plan also urged representation to be proportional to the state’s population. This idea was especially favored by larger states due to the immense amount of representation they would be getting over the smaller states. However, this proposal was not ideal and did not follow up on the thought of every state receiving equal representation. The convention soon compromised between the Virginia and New Jersey plans.

Read More
1402 Words | 6 Pages

The Virginia Plan was James Madison's thought for a more dynamic government. It went about as a reaction to the ineffective Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation gave a great deal of power to the states as opposed

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

The House of Representatives ¨represented the will of the people¨(Patterson 36), complimented the idea of democracy; in the sense that the more people a state had the more votes it would have. On the other hand the Senate was meant to represent each state equally, ¨it was critical, because the smaller states would have refused to join the nation¨(Patterson 36). The Founding Fathers intent was not for the two chambers to constantly disagree with each other, but to compromise and carefully consider legislation, before creating laws. Even though both chambers of congress work together to create laws that hold our society together, there are many differences

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

198). This was known as the New Jersey Plan. In the text, Experience History, it states that this plan raised Congress’s power to tax and regulate trade, and kept national government a unicameral. Though it did not take long before the delegates rejected Paterson’s plan and going back to Madison’s plan. The problem with this plan was the idea of the seats being proportional to the states because some states were bigger than others (Davidson, et al., 2013, p. 198).

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

This plan proposed a structure of government to the Constitutional Convention. However this did not apply for everyone, because this would mean that states with a larger population will get more representatives so they supported this plan while the smaller states were opposed to the plan. There was an alternative option offered called the New Jersey Plan. This plan was also known as the Small State Plan which consisted of 11 resolutions. The New Jersey Plan would be a new process that ensures there is an unbiased selection of State representatives to a centralized legislative body.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

While the New Jersey Plan was not. The Jersey Plan was written by William Paterson. The structure of the government was one house of Congress. Many small states favored this plan more because the votes were equal for all states. To put an end to the debate, Roger Sherman wrote the Great Compromise.

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

Obviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

One becoming a senate must be: over 30 years old, been a US citizen for 9 years, and length of the term is 6 years. There is no limit on how many terms one can serve in either or. From looking at the qualifications, it is fascinating that Representatives have more relaxed qualifications compared to the Senate. These qualifications and the total number of members allowed could be a way to promote sociological representation, representation of group through similar race, gender, ethnicity, and religion as the group.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The founders wanted the Senate to view the impact of their decisions at a national level. They wanted the senate to take a methodical approach to voting. Members of the senate remain in office on six-year terms, much longer then their House of Representative counter parts. The idea behind a six-year term is to provide a form of barrier from the people; this allowed the senate to make long-term decisions rather then, what is developing now. Members of the Senate are also required to be a minimum 30 years of age, as opposed to the 25 years of age for House members.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Congress is broken into two parts, House of Representative and a Senate. The House of Representative follows the people’s concerns and works to resolve it. The Senate is in place to keep the peace when there is a debate and to bring up ideas

Read More

More about Analyze The Differences Between The House Of Representatives And The Senate

Open Document