Argument Against Animal Testing

709 Words3 Pages

(intro) Animal testing, as known as an animal experiment, in which non-human animals are forced to endure distress, suffering or lasting harm in laboratories. They are usually killed after the experiment. Using animals is a major method of drugs and cosmetic likewise it has been accomplished for a long time. It is significant for animal testing in medicine, however, it is against due to immoral. The essay aims to show that animal testing, which is similar to the human, is able to replace human to achieve for the betterment as well as it also gives disadvantages including inhumane and better alternative method would be used.

(pro 1) Animal testing, which has added to numerous individuals in saving lives and curing diseases, avoids using humans to test for the effectiveness of medicine directly. In finding ways to help lifesaving, testing on animals supply reaction the same conditions to the human in determining the probability of the diseases and allergies. Garattini and Grignashi (2017) argued that animal testing is still the suitable method and it must be continued considering the usefulness of the other method which to recovery the illness. Animals can create the benefits for most of animals and humans by using animals testing after test on human subjects though animals must be sacrificed (Howell, 2018). …show more content…

According to Emanuel (1981), the human beings and animals whose have comparable organs and those function. It is known that chimpanzees and mice share about more than half of genes constitute with humans. Due to the same system of their body and biologically identical, the human and the animals would be having the same circumstances and disease. Therefore, the scientists would be gotten a possible and fruitful opinion in the human body or testing production by experimenting with