Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.
Animal testing has been a controversial topic for generations. Is it alright to test new medication and risk the lives of innocent animals to help the future of human health? In this paper, we will research this topic, looking at both the pros and the cons, and at the end I will give you my opinion on the topic. We’ll look at the positives first. It has helped scientists discover many new cures and treatments for diseases.
“Human progress has always been driven by a sense of adventure and unconventional thinking.” Through the following quote, Andre Grein perfectly encapsulates the very notion instilled within us from birth - “Innovate”, “make the world a better place”. Throughout medical history, innovation has allowed us to further mankind’s knowledge on various diseases ranging from cancer to Alzheimer's and resolve harmful threats such as milleria. Despite the rapid growth and successes within the medical field, It would cease to exist without Animal testing.
Animal Testing is perhaps one of the most controversial topics in our generations. In simple words, animal testing is a way of experimentation that uses non-human animals in many varying outcomes related to beauty and medicine. In my eyes, the younger generation holds more interest in debating this topic and all of its divisions. Many have their assumptions for this topic since it is so controversial. With the topic of animal testing, it is easy to assume that your opinion is the only right opinion.
Animal testing has always interested me. I always knew without medical experiments conducted on animals none of our medical breakthroughs would have been made possible. However subjecting animals to pain and suffering creates a moral dilemma. In my research, I found that strict policies are put in place both federal and state. Also funding for animal based research is often difficult to obtain, and once it is, their experiments are heavily regulated.
The discovery of effective drugs has led to many successful developments of medical advances through animal experimentation. “Practically every present-day protocol for the prevention, control, cure of disease and relief of pain is based on knowledge obtained-directly or indirectly-through the research with animals” (Primary Source Document: Foundation for Biomedical Research Extols Benefits of Animal Research, page 1). While some extremists believe that the result of animal testing and experimentation can’t be applied to humans, other researchers and physicians agree that animal research provides invaluable and irreplaceable insight into human systems due to the fact of similarities of human systems and those of animals. “The essential need for animal research is recognized and supported by scientists, medical societies, and health agencies around the world. Further proof of its validity can be found in the vast body of Nobel Prize winning work in physiology and medicine that has been achieved with animal models ranging from fruit flies to zebrafish.”
Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.
Once the best approach in terms of tackling a specific disease or condition, animal experimentation has reached its peak, giving humans less than satisfactory results and conversely taking away the time, effort, and lives put into it. With the growing maltreatment of animals, the creation of alternative and more
Imagine this: a knock of the door. You answer it, not suspecting a thing. As soon as you open it people come barging into your house, steal your beloved pet, and run for their van as they drive away. At this moment you stand, speechless. Millions of questions go through your head, but a note catches your eye.
“An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing.” (“About Animal”). The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. This statistic is only growing and has doubled in the past years. Currently, animals are mostly being used for cosmetic testing and scientific experiments.
The year was 1997, Joseph and Charles Vacanti two researchers, took stem cells from bovine ears and grew an ear on a mouse’s back in a lab. (procon.org) This discovery led the researchers and more scientist to think about using other cells to graft skin for burn victims, and eventually new possibilities in organ growth. Each year in laboratories across the globe, animals and their parts are used to link necessary treatments and medical medications to the needs of both the human and animal species. It is often uncomfortable for people to think about using animals for testing.
Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
Many people have different ideas on animal testing and if it is or is not appropriate for medical research. Many disagree, but there are some that think it’s necessary for testing to be done. Animal testing is necessary because it helps develop life saving medical treatments for not only humans, but animals, and it helps determine how medicine will react to the human body. Animal testing is appropriate for medical research because testing helps develop life saving medical treatments for humans. Without testing, scientist wouldn’t have found ways to help people with breast cancer or childhood Leukemia.
It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
