What Are The Arguments Against Animal Testing

Tragic Testing More than 100 million animals are used in medical laboratories for testing in the United States per year. The grim reality of animal testing is barbaric and horrifying. These animals do not have a voice to refuse such unethical treatment against their will. Testing on animals has been conducted for numerous decades with only little improvement for the environment in which these animals maintain their survival. Therefore, it is up to humans to fight for animal rights. Animals should not continue to be used in research testing because animal testing is expensive, there are effective alternatives to research testing, and humans do not have the right to harm an animal for beneficial outcomes. One reason humans should stop research testing on animals is that performing these tests is highly expensive. Though it

For instance, in present-day technology, new advancements such as computer simulations or stem cell and genetic testing methods could be used as an alternative for the testing on animals. While many companies use animals as a first option to test their new product, not all experiments are essential. The text from the story, “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research,” supports this claim by stating, “The arguments advanced by animal rights activists in opposing the use of animals in biomedical research … are scientific, emotional, and philosophic. … The scientific challenge raised by the animal rights activists goes to the heart of the issue by asking whether animal experiments are necessary for scientific and medical process and whether all the experiments being performed and all the animals being used are justified and required” (623). In other words, this claim suggests that animal rights activists do not believe that all conducted tests are completely fundamental. Furthermore, animal testing is widely used and primarily utilized for products without medical or scientific