Arguments Against Standardized Testing

676 Words3 Pages

For years, standardized testing was the first choice to assess students across the nation on their abilities to comprehend information and be able to answer a question effectively. This method has been used since the 1800s. But is it still the best way to effectively test a student’s abilities? No,it is not.When one test is supposed to determine a student’s future and mental ability,it is not fair.Each individual is different and intelligent in their own way and there simply cannot be one test to measure intelligence. Many years ago, tests were administered mostly to decide placement of students in their classes, or to decide which students needed additional help.Today, test scores are quoted by newspapers, they are used as the primary criteria …show more content…

”China displaced Finland as number one in reading, math, and science when Shanghai debuted on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) rankings in 2009.” Despite calls for a reduction in standardized testing, China’s testing regimen remains firmly in place. Chester E. Finn, Jr., Chairman of the Hoover Institution’s Koret Task Force on K–12 Education, predicts that Chinese cities will top the PISA charts for the next several decades.Another reason why standardized tests are good is because most students believe they are fair.“A June 2006 Public Agenda survey of 1,342 public school students in grades 6-12 found that 71% of students think the number of tests they have to take is “about right” and 79% believe test questions are fair”.This might be right,because maybe if we only look at a student’s grades without standardized testing.A student who is nice to a teacher over a student who misbehaves in class might get a better grade even though both of the students are equally