ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

693 Words3 Pages

Despite the considerable amounts of debate existing upon the topic, standardized testing remains of a prominent facet of modern education because this technique of approximating student intelligence has worked for the vast majority, and it can be expected to continue on. Standardized testing should be continued in order to keep teachers and students successfully executing school curriculum and ensuring preparation for college. Successful educators, accurate progress evaluators, and fair recruitment methods are simply a few of the many benefits standardized testing holds for modern society.The history of these test is one of the strong foundations and should always be considered when debating this subject. Although my opponents will disagree …show more content…

The Ministry hopes the test would allow them the ability to more adequately educate their students. The Vanier Simon test which became known as the first practical IQ evaluator resulted from this request following the lead of these revolutionary influencers. Several educators within the U.S. also began to implement standardized testing. American psychologist Lewis Terman was among the first mission that “every person has an innate, numerically expressible ‘intelligence quotient’ that a test can discern”. Standardized testing is important to continue to implement in schools because it holds teachers responsible in their classroom because teachers are given particular curriculum targets to transfer to their student's structure within classrooms becomes a necessity in order for students to perform adequately on tests. The majority of modern educators favor standardized tests and the benefits they provide for themselves and their students. During his first week in office President George W. Bush announced that “ without yearly testing, we don’t know who is falling behind and who needs help. Without yearly testing, too often we don’t find failure until it is too late to

Open Document