Australia Code Of Ethics Essay

Tracy should respond to Sharon by informing her that it is not appropriate for her to begin working with Jack until she is a Certified Practicing Speech Pathologist (CPSP). Further, she should inform Sharon about where she can find speech pathologist (SP) clinics, so that Jack can get the speech therapy he requires. Moreover, Sharon has made Tracy aware that Jack is having handwriting issues, Tracy could direct Sharon into seeking an occupational therapist to assist Jack with his handwriting. All SP, including student SP are governed by various core practice documents. In no order, SP are governed by the Professional Standards for Speech Pathology in Australia, Speech pathology Australia Code of Ethics, National Code of Conduct for health care

Furthermore, the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics states that within the umbrella of professional competency, SP are required to recognise their competence including their scope of education, training and experience and do not practise beyond these limits (Speech Pathology Australia, 2020, p. 6). Whilst Tracy has completed a paediatric placement, she is not an accredited SP and hence that is a limitation in the services she can provide. Moreover, the Quality Service section within the Code of Ethics states that SP must represent their training and competence accurately (Speech Pathology Australia, 2020, p. 8). Thus, Tracy needs to inform Sharon she is not a SP and has not completed her degree. The National Code of Conduct for health care workers states that a health care worker must attain and maintain the necessary competence in their respective field (Health Council, 2015, p.3). Further, they must not provide health care that is outside of their training or experience (Health Council, 2015, p.3). Additionally, they must recognise their limitations and refer clients to other competent health care providers (Health Council, 2015, p.3). This further demonstrates that Tracy cannot provide SP services that are outside of her

It is apparent that he does not believe his son needs any therapy and will simply “grow out of it”. The speech pathologist working with Jack will be required to take on a family centred-practice approach and build rapport with Jack’s father to help him understand the value in his son being assessed. Further, providing evidence to Jack’s father that his son requires assistance for the betterment of his future. Currently family-centred practice is recognised as the best practice model as it views the therapy in a holistic manner (Raghavendra et al., 2007). Moreover, to help in the application of the family-centred practice, the SP needs to have clinical reasoning. Clinical reasoning describes the thought process that leads to clinical decision (McCallister & Rose, 2000). The refinement of Clinical reasoning comes with knowledge and experience in the field. Hence, Tracy would not have the ability to use her clinical reasoning skills as well as a certified SP. Additionally, a concept within SP is the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). It is a framework that provides the consideration of the health and wellbeing of all people (O'Halloran & Larkins, 2008). There are different variables that are considered within the ICF. They are body structures, function, activity, participation, environmental factors, and personal factors (O'Halloran & Larkins, 2008). In