ipl-logo

Brown V Board Of Education Case Study

702 Words3 Pages

Natalie Padron Brown v Board of Education The first step taken toward protecting the civil rights of black citizens was the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed them basic economic rights to sue, contract for work, and own property. In 1868, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is ratified, assuring that states cannot abridge the privileges or immunities of its citizens; cannot deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and cannot deny any person the equal protection of the law. A Supreme Court case challenging segregated rail cars in Louisiana, Plessy v. Ferguson, ruled that “separate but equal” facilities for black and white travelers do not violate the equals protection clause of the 14th …show more content…

In 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was founded with the intent of eliminating lynching and fighting racial segregation and injustice through legal action. In 1948, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s board of directors endorses special counsel Thurgood Marshall’s view on how to fight segregation, focusing all its efforts on attacking segregation in education. In 1952, Delaware, Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and the District of Columbia were all bundled together under the Brown v. Board of Education, the Kansas case, filed in federal district court the previous year. This means that the Supreme Court views the issue as a matter of national importance. In 2017, African Americans are still being segregated, and face the harsh reality of racism everyday. People make assumptions from what they see, and many African Americans are left to deal with whatever might follow. I feel that the Supreme Court was correct to rule in favor of brown because he made true points about how the …show more content…

Within the lawsuit, Brown claimed that because the black children were not equal to the white schools, the 14th amendment had been violated, which states that no state can “deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” In Kansas, the case went before the District Court, which agreed that public school segregation had a “detrimental effect upon the colored children” and contributed to “a sense of inferiority,” but still upheld the “separate but equal” doctrine. In 1955, state legislatures began to resist enforcing the brown decision, declaring it “null, void and no effect” and implementing laws to change it. The Supreme Court issues Brown II (second ruling in the case) and soon orders appeared that demanded desegregation to proceed “with deliberate

Open Document