Ethical decision-making process are influenced by both individual and environmental characteristics, as well as an interaction with the cognitive process (Cooper, 2012). For every public official whose loyalty is to himself, his organization, and the public, the ethical decision-making process is dynamic, it is not constant, it involves a process of recognizing the problem and moving through the course of action towards finding a possible solution. It is contingent upon several factors. There is no one-size-fits-all for every situation, but the course of action is determined by the individual and environmental factors involved and the ethical character the public official has built over time. Ethical Decision Making The descriptive model of ethical decision making comprises of the way people typically make ethical decisions (Copper, 2012). Every ethical decision is based on the social and cultural context in which it occurs, this is inclusive of the ethical decision to become whistle blowers, as seen in the Dryburgh case study on which this paper is grounded. This paper is focused on demonstrating proper case analysis using Cooper’s ethical decision-making model on the Dryburgh Case Study, the case of Corcoran State Prison. Situation and Ethical Issues Involved in Dryburgh Case Study According to Cooper (2012), an ethical issue exists when competing or conflicting ethical principles or values are embedded in a practical problem. This is reflected in the Dryburgh case