ipl-logo

Cause And Effect Essay On Native American Land

587 Words3 Pages

As I see it the american government should return the land they stole from the native american. Why? you ask...well because the native american have a believe that when they die in somewhere else that its not their land they dont go to the spirit world with their ancestors but if they die in their land they move forward. Secondly i believe they should get land is because at this moment native americans get about 7000 dollars a year and a average person makes about 50000. The average lifetime is only 50 years (in the rest of the US, the average is 78 years) for the native. You have more than 70% of working-age people without jobs, and all kinds of problems that come along with that. Very tough conditions for the native americans. If the …show more content…

In conclusion i believe that america should return the land they stole from the indians. Some might argue that america should give the native americans land.however this is not true because with land they cant fix there problems but with money like something “That involves investing in early childhood education, fixing the schools in those communities, being willing to work in terms of job creation and job training. Those are serious investments.” With these things being builded the dropout rate will decreases. Secondly “a national apology and providing a $20,000 reparations payment to every surviving internee.This maybe true but without land they can't do a lot of building . This is enough money for the native to start there life again and plus the 7k$ they make. Thirly I also think if native americans get money the could get help for their drinking problem and drug problem and then they won’t be such a high suicide rate for them. Finally i believe that if money was giving they could make a casino like other native american they could make good money to live. This maybe true but without land they can't do a lot of

Show More
Related
276 Words | 2 Pages

Hello Tamara Thank you for the insight on the federal Indian termination policies durning the 1950’s,and our selfish acts in attempting to move Indians off reservations and into subruban areas, I feel that justice could never be made for the todays native americans simply because the suffering we put their ansestors through could never take away the tears or pain we inflicted on them ,even though our federal government had even initiated a policy of removal as well as termination of the native americans under this particular policy that was souly created so the Native American people would no longer be government wards on reservations which todays era they are entiltled for the most psrt “subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

why would America claim it's theirs if they’ve probably never even seen the land. According to an article written by PBS I titled “Indian Removal” it states, “In 1823 the Supreme Court handed down a decision which stated that Indians could occupy lands within the United States, but could not hold title to those lands. This was because their “right of occupancy” It's ridiculous that America wants to move something or more importantly someone that has been there for hundreds of years. If you don't understand what I mean, Think about it this way, would you want to be moved from your house after living there for live thirty years.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

Evidence from the Majority Opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831, by the Supreme Court of the United States, shows that Indians were stripped of their rights to encourage them to move west so that Americans could take over their land. This evidence proves that Native Americans were mistreated and manipulated so that Americans could take their home to make it their own. It's worth noting that this source was created to discuss the Indian Removal Act, and the author's background or point of view is that Andrew Jackson wanted the Indian Removal Act. However, this source is reliable because it was written by the president at the time. Based on the Cherokee Nation of Indians' letter to Congress, it is evident that they firmly protested against a false treaty that they were tricked into.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

How would you feel if you were told that you have to move off of your own land to somewhere else just for the pleasure of other people? The Indian Removal Act will not only be cruel and harsh, but it will be extremely wrong on our part. What side do you stand on? Are you in favor of, or against it? You surely, will not only disagree with this act, but will be completely against it.

Read More
1808 Words | 8 Pages

Ever since the United States was founded, Native Americans have been oppressed. Relations between the Native American tribes and the United States government have always been tense and unhealthy. The United States government has a long list of offenses against the Native American rights, such as the Indian Removal Act, which forced Native Americans off their land and pushed them towards the west coast on a route that was dubbed as the “trail of tears” and resulted in the brutal deaths of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans. The Constitution of the United States affirms that Native Americans have rights by stating that the land that Native Americans are settled on may not be seized except in times of war (Frank). However, this is repeatedly violated by the United States, along with other treaties and laws that mean to protect Native American rights.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

“Owning land was extremely important to the European settlers … meant that a person had great wealth and political power”(VOA). On the other side, the native population, “believed that no one could own land … that anyone could use it … [and that if one] wanted to live on a piece of land and grow crops [one] could do so”(VOA). At the beginning when there were not that many colonizers the Native tribes were helping these Europeans and would share the land with them, but as tribes such as the Lenni Lenape began to see that more people were coming from another part of the world and started to take their lands, cut the trees and build roads and houses, the native tribes stated to see the true intentions of these

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

America is a country where tenacious individuals unified, and took control over the land that is now rightfully ours. The grueling hardships of my ancestors must not go unnoticed and disregarded- we must take control back over our country. The savages are hindering our progress in the expansion of land ownership, and therefore hindering our progress as a maturing nation. Indian habitation immobilizes the advancement of population, wealth, and power, and the Removal Act will in turn correct these derailments. Andrew Jackson, who I support fully, made several important points about the aboriginal population and the importance of relocating them.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

The United States sent armies into the Native American lands, mistreating the Native Americans, and caused trouble against them by sparkling conflicts and wars. “It is not, of course, to be understood that the government of the United States is at the mercy of Indians; but thousands of its citizens are, even thousands of families. Their exposed situation on the extreme verge of settlement affords a sufficient justification to the government for buying off the hostility of the Savages, excited and exasperated as they are…by the invasion of their hunting grounds and the threatened extinction of their game.” (Document 4) The United States government introduced policies for Native Americans to have a better life, but in fact, they kept them in

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

The Cherokee had been living on the land far longer than the settlers had arrived. They built their own land and made a whole society. The Cherokee were healthy and they had all the buffalo they needed and they had herbs. Only a handful of the Cherokee leaders signed the treaty and the Supreme Court even said they could stay. It is wrong to push people out of their own home when they did nothing wrong.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

With the Indians finally placed in a spot which is theirs, though far away from where they were born, a fake delegation arises and causes them to withdraw from that land. "It comes to us, not through our legitimate authorities, the known and usual medium of communication between the Government of the United States and our nation, but through the agency of a complication of powers, civil and military. ” (Cherokee letter protesting the Treaty of New Echota, 1836), without looking back, and only viewing their future straight forward, the US takes everything they can and don’t even try to reduce the Native Indians ' pain. Instead of trying to solve the main problem and stop the treaty from forcing the Native Indians out of their land, they sent troops to make it fast and clean. "Our property may be plundered before our eyes; violence may be committed on our persons; even our lives may be taken away, and there is none to regard our complaints. …

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Many began by leasing their land. If Anglo-Americans wished for Natives to make a living off farming their land, well then why not lease for enough funds to feed a whole Native family? With the help of leasing “Native Americans no longer had to attempt to farm or develop their land. Nor did they have significant reasons to accept Anglo culture or society. They could live as they wanted, supported by the money from lease incomes.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

It was wrong to invade and claim forcefully, through unfair treaties, and cruel action. We can’t go back time to change anything, but the scar left for the Cherokees should always remind us, of the serious consequences, and prevent any further

Read More
198 Words | 1 Pages

However, others believe that the relationship with the land and the people was for survival. Native Americans used the land to survive and learn its ways. Many tribes were known around the West. They lived in areas of land that they understood and knew how to use it. An example of a Native tribe are the Sioux.

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME] Explanatory Models of People about Mental Illness S.J.Sangeeta R2014MH010 9/18/2014   Explanatory model: Explanatory model is an explanation for what purpose and in which way a thing works or we can say it is an explanation for a phenomenon the way it is. It does not give a complete explanation of the reality of the thing and even it does not claim to be fully accurate. The explanation should get fit in context to the thing or phenomenon, so that the explanatory model becomes useful. The explanation of an explanatory model should be helpful to make a decision and to explain the reality of the world around us. Mental Illness: Mental illness is a state which is not developmentally or socially normative in nature.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

For centuries, Shakespeare’s compositions have fascinated audiences and academics alike. King Lear, one of Shakespeare’s most established tragedies, details King Lear’s catastrophic downfall from the throne of Britain. Based on an earlier work by Geoffrey of Monmouth, Shakespeare adapts “Leir of Britain” from Historia Regum Britanniae as the groundwork for King Lear. Although Shakespeare’s theatrical production remains undoubtedly comparable to its source, significant differences between the two works result in distinct outcomes. Shakespeare, in comparison to Monmouth, opts to develop Lear to a greater extent.

Read More

More about Cause And Effect Essay On Native American Land

Related Topics

Open Document