ipl-logo

Checks And Balances Essay

582 Words3 Pages

The system of checks and balances is one of the most crucial parts of the constitution. It ensures that the legislative, executive, or judicial branch doesn’t become too powerful by requiring each branch to “check” the powers of the other branches. Additionally, the judicial branch has the task of judicial review, which is the process of the judicial branch of government to review actions made by the legislative and executive branches of government. To ensure that the power of judicial review isn’t abused, checks are applied to this process so one branch doesn’t overpower the others.
Congress can create a new law or amend the constitution as a check to judicial review. Additionally, the Supreme Court must ratify, or approve by vote, any actions …show more content…

Madison established the process of judicial review. The Judiciary Act of 1801 had been established, which added 10 additional district courts, expanded the number of circuit courts from three to six, and added additional judges to each circuit, which gave the President the authority to appoint Federal justices and justices of peace. William Marbury had been appointed as a Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia by John Adams, who was going to leave office the next day. But, when John Adams left office, the new president, Thomas Jefferson, elected new judges and Marbury was forced to leave. Marbury was outraged, so he took his case to court and stated that he “had the right to his job”. The case ruled that Marbury did in fact have the right to his job, and congress immediately counteracted the Judiciary Act of 1801 with the Judiciary Act of 1802, which allowed the Judicial Branch to operate under the previous Judiciary Act of 1789 and additionally created the power of judicial review. But, to make sure that this power wouldn’t be abused in the future, congress added checks to balance this

Show More
Related
207 Words | 1 Pages

In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. One major factor they were trying to guard against was tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler. This was a big fear because they didn’t want this democracy to turn into a dictatorship. So the delegates brainstormed and make the checks and balances for the three main branches of government. Checks and balances meant that each branch would check all the other branches and balance out their power equally.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

The signifigance or Marbury vs. Madison is the ruling gave of the Supreme Court of the U.S.A the power of Judicial review and also gave courts some power to try and take down legislation that was unconstitutional. In Marbury the Supreme Court declared a law passed by the government was unconstitutional and should be not be enforced called the Judiciary Law of 1789.The decision helped define the boundary between the constitutionally judicial and executtive branches of forming the American government. Marbury vs. Madison has been used as justification for the amassing of power by the supreme court. Marshall justified his ruling that the Supreme Court could not order Madison to deliver Marbury's because part of the Judiciary Act of 1789, was unconstitutional because it expanded the Court's original jurisdiction to include cases like

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

The presidential election of 1800 might have just been one of the most controversial in our nation's history. Federalists President John Adams fought for reelection but it became clear that the Anti-Federalists, led by Democratic-Republican and Vice President Thomas Jefferson, would take the office. Meanwhile in an effort to preserve the influence of the party, the federalist-led congress pass the judiciary act of 1801 which reorganized the federal judiciary, and the District of Columbia organic Act, both of which created dozens of new judgeships and justice ships. Marbury had been lawfully appointed and confirmed as justice of the peace and therefore had a right to his commision. Marshall went on to say that Marbury was entitled to redress

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson, with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office, he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall, who was secretary of state of the time, failed to deliver seventeen commissions, one of which belonged to William Marbury. James Madison, Marshall’s successor, failed to deliver the rest of the appointments at the request of Thomas Jefferson.

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

Under the Judiciary Act of 1801, Marbury sued Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. He was asking the Court to force Madison to accept the appointment. The court denied and held that it lacked strength because the section of the Judiciary Act passed by Congress in 1789 authorized the Court to issue such a writ was invalid. Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Constitution must always

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

“Before Jefferson took office on March 4, 1801, Adams and Congress passed the Judiciary Act 1801, which created new courts, added judges, and gave the president more control over appointment of judges. The Act was essentially an attempt by Adams and his party to frustrate his successor, as he used the act to appoint 16 new circuit judges and 42 new justices of the peace.”

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

Marbury v. Madison In the final days of his presidency, John Adams approved a law for 16 new federal judges, called the Judiciary Act of 1801. Thomas Jefferson did not agree with these last minute appointments. Secretary of State James Madison did not deliver the appointment notices to the judges. William Marbury, one of the new judges, fought back against losing his new job.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

On account of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court decided that they didn't have the ability to constrain President Jefferson to convey the commissions that he had solicited Secretary from State James Madison to not convey to the "midnight judges" designated by John Adams just before his term as president finished. Despite the fact that the Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court the ability to issue writs of mandamus, Article III of the Constitution did not permit the Supreme Court. By settling on this choice, the Supreme Court initially showed its energy of legal audit; to upset a government demonstration since they trust it is illegal. Some would contend that the force of legal audit makes the legal branch too capable, while others

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

Adam waited until the last hour of being president to appointment a new judge. This mark the first problem (constitutional separation of power) for the Supreme Court case cause Marbury V. Madison in 1803 (page 58). Adam and Congress create a new court system for the capital of Washington D.C... William Marbury was appointment (by Adam) to be the justice of peace. On Adam last night of being the president, he delivered the contract to Marbury right before midnight.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

In Marbury v. Madison (1803) it was announced by the Supreme Court for the very first time, that if an act was deemed inconsistent with the constitution then the court was allowed to declare the act void. Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, denied William Marbury of his commission. President John Adams appointed William Marbury the justice of peace for the District of Columbia during his last day in office. Madison denied Marbury of this commission because he believed that because it was not issued before the termination of Adams presidency, that it was invalid. Marbury himself started a petition, along with three others who were in a similar situation.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The Effects of the Marbury vs. Madison Case on the Rights of Americans The Marbury vs. Madison case had a monumental effect on the government. It was the first United States Supreme Court case where the decision was made (by the US Supreme Court) to declare a law unconstitutional. The reason for the suit occurred on President John Adams’ last night of presidency, commonly called his “midnight appointment,” in which he appointed a Federalist land speculator from Maryland named William Marbury into the office of justice of the peace in Washington D.C.. When James Madison took his office as secretary of state, Marbury’s letter of appointment remained undelivered and Thomas Jefferson had him retain it. Outraged by this, Marbury sued Madison in

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

(Document B). John Jay dismissed President John Adams proposal, for he knew John Marshall would bring these positive elements to the Court better than himself. John Marshall was elected to the Supreme Court a few months following this event. Another impact John Marshall made concerning the judicial branch was in the Court case Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which addressed the judicial branch’s authority over laws. The Supreme Court decided that it was the, “duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” (Document C).

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

For the Judiciary Act, written by Congress in 1789, to allow the Court’s power be extended to cases like the Marbury v. Madison case would mean that the Supreme Court overstepped their boundaries. It was then that Chief of Justice Marshall suggested judicial review, which is when an act of Congress is examined and revised as needed to correlate with the Constitution. Though Marshall admitted that Marbury deserved a writ of mandamus, the Court was unable to give him one in this situation because

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The Checks and Balances are the ways that the three branches of government check each other to make sure each one doesn’t go crazy with power. Legislative Branch checks the Judicial Branch, Judicial Branch checks the Executive Branch, and the Executive Branch checks the Legislative Branch. (Document C). This helps guard against tyranny because each of the branches can check the other one to make sure the branches don’t get too much power. The final way that the constitution helped guard against tyranny was the Big States and Small States Compromise.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

Read More

More about Checks And Balances Essay

Related Topics

Open Document