ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagaaki

1101 Words5 Pages

When we think of war, we think of soldiers fighting in the trenches, aiming at other soldiers hundreds of feet away, and tactical weapons such as bombs and mines used. While this may be accurate for the smaller areas of war, the larger decisions of war are made by tactically weighing different options and looking at the psychological and ethical effects of each of them. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagaaki by the US in Japan was devastating to both the government and citizens of Japan. Japan, fearing that the United States will stop at nothing in order to win the way. In this essay, we will look at three different scenarios
The way we choose the best choice out of the ones that are given to us we must look at each of these choices follow …show more content…

That is, either intentionally killing innocent people and/or intentionally inducing terror in a population. Some of these actions use terror as a means to the end of our side, while other actions may use death as a side effect of the actions that we intend to do. This is different than killing other people in self defense. Depending on how you end up in specific situations, situation one might be considered as evil by some parties because you are intentionally causing terror to end the war. However, this situation may be viewed differently if you were under attack and stationed near the hospital while there were different troops approaching your area. This situation is also very consistent with the principle of possible harm, as the amount of harm that you are doing far outweights the possible harm that would come as a result of not bombing the hospital. The second situation could no way be considered an act of defense, primarily because of the amount of people you are …show more content…

The phone situation also falls under the category because if you end up killing hundred fifty people and you find out that their opposition leader resin actually in the hospital you are liable for these people for your killed inside of the hospital and you may have broken several ethical codes in the process of doing so.
So what's the scenario is the best one to follow in in the course of action is that we have to follow? the simple fact list about to take consideration after the exam or all the arguments that we can. Which arguments are you most likely to weigh in? Will you go for the scenario that follows the Doctrine of double effect the best? Will you go for the situation that will not necessarily kill the most people possible, but rather the situation that will cause the most amount of terror in the

Show More
Related

Thunder On The River Summary

1586 Words | 7 Pages

A review of Thunder On the River The Civil War in Northeast Florida by Daniel L. Schafer Growing up in the northern state of Illinois, a student was always taught in school that the Civil War was about slavery and president Abraham Lincoln. Reading this book gives the reader a point of view that is not normally explained in northern states. Daniel L. Schafer the Author of the Book Thunder on the river, explains in great detail with firsthand accounts of how the Civil War started, who was involved and what happened, before during and after the war. In the Preface of the book, Schafer explains how he was able to write the book; he was asked to edit the draft of Richard A. Martin 's two volume history of Jacksonville more than twenty five years

Read More

Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

1394 Words | 6 Pages

Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.

Read More

Summary Of Thank God For The Atom Bomb By Paul Fussell

499 Words | 2 Pages

Although Fussell admits that the bomb was a “most cruel ending to that most cruel war”, and that those who claim that the use of the atom bomb was wrong are simply attempting to “resolve ambiguity” concerning the ethics of war, he believes that the bomb was, without doubt, necessary. Using mainly statistics and accounts of soldiers, Fussell introduces several compelling figures. First, he reveals that for the anticipated Allied invasion of Japan, “one million American casualties was the expected price“. Secondly, Fussell tells us that “Universal national kamikaze was the point” which means that every man, woman, and child in Japan would have been prepared to sacrifice their life in defense of the homeland. If this suicidal loyalty is taken into consideration, it seems that the loss of Japanese life upon the invasion of the mainland would have far outweighed the actual loss of life that occurred when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed.

Read More

Analysis Of From Spanish American War Kevin O Reilly

1249 Words | 5 Pages

The controversy surrounding the decision to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has raged on for years. Others maintain that the bombing was needless and unjustified, while others maintain that it was vital to end the war and preserve lives and that it was important to end the war. In this paper, I will inspect, analyze, and criticize the argument on the bombing of Japan during World War Two that was presented by Kevin O'Reilly in his book "From Spanish-American War to Vietnam War." O'Reilly's thesis is found in "From Spanish-American War to Vietnam War. " We are going to go over the essay paragraph by paragraph and analyze its goal, the type of support it provides, and the quality of that support.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing

170 Words | 1 Pages

Only two out of the 110 pounds of fissile material in the nuclear bomb actually blew up on Hiroshima. In the article, “The Hiroshima Bombing: What you need to know about the nuclear attack,” by The Los Angeles Times, it proceeds to state facts about the Hiroshima bombing and about President Obama’s trip to Japan. Obama is the first president to visit Hiroshima since the bombing and has clearly stated that it is not an apology trip. About 140,000 people were killed in the bombing from the initial blast or by radiation poisoning. Not only Japanese were killed, a dozen Americans and 20,000 Koreans were also killed.

Read More

Essay On How Did The Us Enter Ww2

574 Words | 3 Pages

WWII was a significant event in the U.S. history, and killed many people with new inventions and a numerous amount of weapons. This event was one of the most important factors in Japan’s surrender and America’s victory. In my opinion, I think that the atomic bomb should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, for many reasons. In this paper, I will share how Japan made the U.S. enter the war, how the loss of Americans increased, and how the U.S. was not the only one trying to make the bomb. The first reason that I think that the atomic bomb should have been dropped was that Japan made the U.S. enter the war and start fighting.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

630 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

Read More

Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

740 Words | 3 Pages

Step into Hiroshima history, where the atomic bomb not only ended World War II but sparked a heated debate. Were the Americans justified in bombing Hiroshima? Is the question that still lingers to this day. The Americans were not justified in bombing Hiroshima, what did they get out of it, and what events did it cause to change the world? The United States of America was not just in the bombing of Hiroshima in a variety of ways.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Bombing Dbq Essay

1240 Words | 5 Pages

There have been few national catastrophic events that have remained relevant to each new generation of people. Some of these circumstances occurred naturally while others caused great damage purposefully. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings of World War II are among the moments in time that are recognizable to each person worldwide. Although these bombings were extremely significant during the war and lead to Japanese surrender, there are many speculations concerning whether or not the bombings were crucial for the victory of the United States. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were both extremely necessary because other strategies of the United States to end the war would not have been as effective, the United States needed a way to intervene

Read More

Compare And Contrast Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

764 Words | 4 Pages

When soldiers from world war two went off and killed people, most people don't think about where that violence stems from but in a war . The nonfiction articles “The Men Who Pulled the Trigger” and “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” shows that people put in bad situations do things that they don't even need to believe in just because it stems from hierarchy and environment and in the book Lord Of The Flies it suggests the same. The environment and hierarchy surrounding people cause violence. Both texts suggest that violence is caused by hierarchy.

Read More

Ethical Decision-Making In Healthcare: Lessons From The Challenger Disaster

1074 Words | 5 Pages

Ethical decision-making in healthcare: Balancing beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice in clinical practice. Journal of Medical Ethics - "The Journal of Medical Ethics" Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36688269/ Zolkefli, Y. (2020) - The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the Healthcare ethics and principles in critical care settings: A framework for ethical decision-making. BMC Medical Ethics -. Retrieved from

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Chilling Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

646 Words | 3 Pages

The chilling bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a hotly debated subject for many in the US because of the devastation they left behind. Two contrasting beliefs arose during the debate: Gar Alperovitz and Herbert Feis, where two historians argued for the opposing sides. Gar Alperoviz argued that there was no justification for killing the lives of pedestrians, and Herbert feis disagreed, saying that it was unavoidable and ended up saving more lives than it ended. Though both sides make pretty solid points, Gar Alperoviz’s argument is more morally and legally sensible. Alperov was a historian, economist, and a founder of the Harvard institute.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified

1976 Words | 8 Pages

There are many differing opinions on the subject of whether the dropping of the atomic bombs was justified. One side, such as people in the US, argue that the dropping of the bombs were justified, as it allowed them to test the bomb and end the war quickly. However, another side which includes many people in Japan and pacifists, argues that the dropping of the bomb was not justified, as the effects of the bomb were too horrific. Even though this essay will be exploring both sides of the argument, the second atomic bomb should not have been dropped on Nagasaki.

Read More

Humorous Wedding Speech: Who Are You Guys?

507 Words | 3 Pages

Hello! I have been thinking of you guys and your family throughout the years and have wanted to write you a letter, but I have always put it off. I want to thank you BOTH for everything that you guys did for me while I was growing up. You both took me into your family and treated me like I was part of your own family.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagaaki

Related Topics

Open Document