ipl-logo

Comparing Christian Feudalism And Islamic Caliphate

550 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Rise Of Feudalism

Christian Feudalism was a system that was based off of the land that people were tied and could move to. There were hierarchy classes that would impact your rights and responsibilities. These hierarchies are evident in both systems. A difference that Islamic Caliphate had from Christian Feudalism was that it was based off of trade and not land. The system that had better definition, rights, and responsibilities was the Christian system of Feudalism.

Citizenship in Feudalism was having rights and responsibilities. Every person, no matter what class was in charge of things and gave things in return. This same definition of citizenship is found in Islamic Caliphate. But, a difference that is evident between the two systems was that there …show more content…

If they were in the Feudal system, they might be in the rank 2 with lords, nobles, or barons. This change in rankings makes Christian Feudalism better in definition. Not only is Caliphate not as superior in definition, they were not as good in rights as in Feudalism. The rights in Feudalism was based on the classes that people were in. While in Islamic Caliphate, peoples’ rights were based on their classes as well. But, people in Feudalism had more rights and were allowed to do more things than in Caliphate. Even though Islamic Caliphate allowed people to move to other muslim lands, people were able to do most anything they wanted to do in Feudal Europe. Sometimes peasants had to get permission to do things like marry, but they were usually able to do a lot of things. An example of the more rights people could get would be between women in Caliphate and female serfs in Feudalism. Women in Feudal times were able to help with the work and didn’t have to stay at home all of the time and take care of kids. But, Caliphate women just had the right to take care of the kids and do household chores. Finally, Feudalism also possessed people having more fair and better responsibilities. Even though Caliphates

Show More
Related

Similarities Between Tokugawa Japan And Medieval Europe

687 Words | 3 Pages

Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with

Read More

Compare And Contrast Japanese And European Feudal System

788 Words | 4 Pages

The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

Read More

How Did The Life Of The Middle Ages Ap Euro Dbq

534 Words | 3 Pages

These relationships were called feudalism (Doc. 1). Feudalism and the Church greatly contributed to the social, economic, and political life in Europe in the Middle Ages. “Feudalism was a political, economic, and social system which included kings, nobles, knights, and serfs (Doc. 1).” Every position or status had a job that benefitted another ranking (Doc. 1). For example, a king grants land to nobles, nobles granted land to knights, and knights grant land to serfs (Doc. 1).

Read More

Why Did Absolute Monarchs Grow Their Power In The 1600s

674 Words | 3 Pages

In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.

Read More

Middle Ages Dbq Essay

357 Words | 2 Pages

The Middle Ages was a period that lasted from about 500 to 1500(OI). There were kings and queens, nobles, knights, and peasants (Doc. 1). People were treated and respected differently according to their class(OI). There were special relationships and responsibilities that everyone had. In the Middle Ages feudalism affected people’s lives economically, socially, and politically.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Feudal System

174 Words | 1 Pages

The control of the different types of classes, nobles, knights, and pheasants. Second Paragraph: The drawbacks and cons of the Feudal system. Third Paragraph: The benefits that the feudal system offers to each class.

Read More

How Did The Cleisthenes Affect The Change Of Democracy In England

560 Words | 3 Pages

The feudalism system for England starts from peasant for the losts and merchants and tax collectors after that military people protecting high ranking people and then comes noble class people who are born into money or buy or gets deeds. It affected Democracy when people started to learned how to read and write and they wanted the same right and realized how unfair it was and fought for their right of a normal life and a thing was that getting tax from people was a thing and know it still is but sometimes it is use for good things but also bad things. Feudalisation was somewhat the bases of democracy big thing in difference and many in the same like how each one has a leader but one leader can control anything and one has the supreme court and the

Read More

Compare And Contrast Byzantine Empire And Islamic Caliphates

620 Words | 3 Pages

Two new empires rose in the Mediterranean and middle east; The Byzantine Empire & the Islamic Caliphates, the Byzantine Empire was run on Christianity while the Caliphates was run by the teachings of Muhammad and the holy book the Quran. While both the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Caliphates had major divides in their religion and also state, and they both recognized their head of state (Ceaser or Caliph respectively) also as a head religious leader, they based their political rulings from different sources, Byzantines’ from its Roman predecessor and the Islamic Caliphate from the Quran and Muhammad’s life and teachings. In both Empires, religion and politics worked had in hand, as the political leaders were also established as the head religious leaders. As their respective states both believed that religion, it gave the leaders lots of justification for different rulings and movements, such as expansion.

Read More

Bubonic Plague Dbq

910 Words | 4 Pages

However, this could be better seen in their form of government. Feudalism was a system that had land owners at the top (Kings and lords) and those who worked the land and keep the community safe at the bottom. It was basically impossible to move between social classes, and a desire to keep the rich with the rich meant that one couldn’t marry into money It was a social, economic, political, and legal system that stood in place for hundreds of years. The system, however meant that the government was weak, and it rarely stretched far; the larger the kingdom, the harder it was to keep it working. It also meant there were a lot of poor people living in the fifteen hundreds.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Byzantine Empire And Western Europe

121 Words | 1 Pages

Both empires’ economies were very different. The Byzantine became one of the wealthiest empires ever, while the Western economy was an agricultural based with little trading with

Read More

Islamic Caliphates Vs Byzantine Empire

897 Words | 4 Pages

- The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion. - The Byzantine Empire and Islamic Caliphates both used religion as a way to unite their people, and as a justification for expansion.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Western Roman Empire And Abbasid Caliphate

576 Words | 3 Pages

This was a very big shift in both empires. The Abbasid Caliphate is located in Baghdad. Where it fell in 1258. This empire is important to history because it brought a lot of new inventions in education, arts and medicine. The Western Roman Empire and Abbasid Caliphate fell because of power and war.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Christian Empire And Western Byzantine Empire

472 Words | 2 Pages

The Eastern Germanic and Western Byzantine empires were coexisting realms in the worlds of Medieval Christendom but they were drastically different in many regards. Although neighboring kingdoms, the two empires had few similarities and great amounts of differences. The East and Western Worlds of Medieval Christendom differed in their economies and ideals of Christianity but the effect of having a unified religion was similar for both empires. The economic state of each of the empires, specifically towards the beginning of their reign, were stark contrasts. The Eastern Byzantine empire had a thriving economy due to inheriting strategic and prosperous land.

Read More

Differences In The Expansion Of Christianity And Islam

477 Words | 2 Pages

While both Islam and Christianity were spread Christianity had more governments in control than Islam. The Christians and Islam each believed that there is only one true God that sends down a messenger

Read More

Women's Roles In The Middle Ages

895 Words | 4 Pages

Beginning with the emergence of the Middle Ages, it is safe to say that men completely overshadowed women. The concept of the Medieval Period was taken over by thoughts of the male gender. Perhaps, it is safe to say women in the Medieval Period were neglected Not only did the women lack appreciation, they were also stripped of some of the most basic rights that men possessed. Unfair laws at the time stated that women could not marry without their parents’ consent,and to make matters worse, they also couldn’t divorce their husbands. Another outrageous law stated that women could not inherit land if she had surviving brothers .

Read More

More about Comparing Christian Feudalism And Islamic Caliphate

Related Topics

Open Document