The best way to persuade or control a human is by playing with his emotions. This can be proven in many ways, both personal and social. Moreover, it could be the secret to ruling the world. Nevertheless, the government has been using it for keeping secrets and lies. Overall, it's just a method, which had a great response, if done right. For example, have you tried to convince someone to do a favor for you, and the person said no. Then you try make it as a favor that you’ll later return or make it sentimental as possible, so he could do it. Regardless, it’s true that, it’s not going to work every single time. However, throughout the time that humans had been on earth, there's been some examples that can prove that this method works. During the late 18ᵗʰ century and 19ᵗʰ or 20ᵗʰ centuries, George Orwell wrote “Shooting an Elephant” and Jonathan Swift, …show more content…
Actually, in the essay, it emphasizes that children are the problem rather than people, making the matters even worse. The crux of the matter is, there have been a lot of women, mothers with many children, but the matter is that they are poor. Consequently, being the cause as for why these children die in numerous ways. Despite this, no human should agree to this proposal, because it is against our own human nature. Thus, he expresses this in a way that makes him seem mad or angry. Following this, he makes fact of how it lowers the population, makes recipes using the child meat. Above all, the thing that make the reader most unpleasant is the fact that he said that this cannibalistic child meat tastes good and can prove to be healthy for you. As could be seen there’s a strong difference between these essays, they had the same method but in "A Modest Proposal" this method is indirect and social, whereas "Shooting an Elephant" is also indirect but more to the individual rather than the