ipl-logo

Confederation Vs Constitution

600 Words3 Pages

The common definition we use of justice is just behavior or treatment. In relation to our United States government, this particular word means righteousness, equitableness or moral rightness. The Constitution aimed to better their original governing document called the Articles of Confederation and I do believe that the framers who shaped this made an immense amount of progress for our country, though do not stand for some of the policies they had to add.
Our first paper involved learning three important men in America’s history voicing their personal opinions on the Constitution and how to possibly fix some flaws. George Washington was very determined to have a strong central government so the country would act as one state in any decision, stating that “we should confederate as a nation”, meaning he believed that the United States would become weak if we did not agree. John Jay wanted all of the framers to have a sit-down and discuss how to create a better government and make it successful so nobody began to regret …show more content…

Starting with our Legislative that creates our laws, the Executive carries out these certain rules if passed, and the Judicial evaluates these regulations. Each of those branches individually are crucial to how America functions, but a prime example to show how they all collaborate together is the vetoing process. First seen inside the United States Constitution, the veto procedure “begins with the President if a bill gets passed from the Senate and the House of Representatives.” Those two groups mentioned are apart of Congress in the Legislative branch. Presuming with the entire process, “the Executive branch has to look at the document before making it into a law. He can either approve or reject it. If the House or Senate considers on overriding the President, two-thirds have to approve in order for the bill to become a

Show More
Related
167 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution was far superior to the Articles of Confederation because, the Articles of Confederation had fewer powers than the Constitution. Also, the Constitution created a balance in the government that the Articles of Confederation did not. Lastly, the Constitution took everyones thoughts into consideration. The Articles of Confederation did not include as many powers as the Constitution did. In the political cartoon it showed all the powers that the Constitution included that the Articles of Confederation discluded.

Read More
277 Words | 2 Pages

The executive branch makes laws official. The president is the head of the executive branch. There is a separate judiciary and interpreter of laws. The relationship between national and state powers was good because states make and enforce their own laws.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

After series of taxation without representation placed upon the American colonies by the Great Britain, the colonies finally declared independence in 1776. To become a stabilized country, the colonies established the Article of Confederation the following year. Americans were upset that under the Article of Confederation their voice was not being heard in the government and their businesses were failing economically. As a result, Daniel Shays led four thousand rebels against the government because of the economic and civil rights injustices. Then the Founding Fathers gathered at the Philadelphia in 1787 to modify the Article of Confederation.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The Executive branch executes laws and is the president. The Judicial branch judges laws and is the Supreme Court. The Legislative branch creates laws and is the House of Representatives and Senate. James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 Document B, “the accumulation of all powers...in the same hands...may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This helps protect from tyranny because the Separation of Powers prevents all power from being in the same hands.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

When the Constitution was first drafted in Philadelphia, 1787, there was strong opposition to it from the supporters of the Articles of Confederation, America’s first governing document. One of the starkest Anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, believed the Constitution was a gateway to power for tyrants, similarly, Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed the Constitution’s ratification, believing the Constitution would strip Americans of their freedoms and liberties. Despite their efforts, the Constitution was signed into law, and is now contrarily viewed as that which protects Americans’ rights. The US Constitution is a more democratic document than the Articles of Confederation because under the Articles there was no proportional representation, Americans did not directly vote for any representatives in Congress under the Articles, and the Constitution implemented federal income taxes were able to fund a government that could effectively protect the rights of American citizens.

Read More
1554 Words | 7 Pages

In a perfect world the three branches would work seamlessly, as the writers of the Constitution had intended, but with over 430 members of the House of Representatives, 100 members of the Senate, and nine justices serving on the Supreme Court begs for convolution and, at sometimes, chaos. After the law has been proposed, carried out, and evaluated the President has the option to pass or veto the law. One would think that because the head of the American government, elected by the people, has made the order, the process would stop there. But because of the Constitution, Congress, really having all the power, are able to take Presidential veto and overturn

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Compare and contrast the constitution The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called to revise the ailing Articles of Confederation. The Constitution has similarities and differences to the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was made of a one body Government, that only allowed states to have one vote to select a representative. The Congress can make laws but cannot enforce them, and congress were not allowed to tax the people.

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

When writing the Constitution, the Federalists, which included Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, had stated the rights and liberties of the civilians within the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, a federalist, believed that if a Bill of Rights was to be created then the whole idea of republican government would fall apart. As stated in a federalist letter, " [the constitution] would contain various exceptions to powers not granted, and on this very account would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted”(Federalist No. 71, Alexander Hamilton). The Constitution stated that all free people had equal rights. Rights that were implicit, which connected to fixing all the problems within the government and the people.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

The Executive Branch has the tie breaking vote, they advise the president, they can veto congressional legislation, and they command the armed forces. The Legislative Branch can introduce and pass bills, while the Judicial Branch determines whether or not the actions of people and the laws are constitutional. Checks and balances allow each government to keep one person from having all the power in the

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the executive branch was responsible for enforcing or vetoing laws passed by Congress (in addition to its other powers). As for the judiciary, it is responsible for interpreting federal laws and the constitution and for overseeing the decisions made by the federal and state courts. Before when it was unable to address economic and boundary disputes, the judiciary under the constitution was able to address a wide range conflicts. Above all, these three branches of government share equal power to prevent one form of government from becoming too

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning before the Constitution and before the Articles of the Confederation, there was no law or identity to the United States. We were independent but had no centralized government. The colonists didn’t want a strong government because they were breaking away from a strong government and didn’t want to have a government as powerful as Brittan, so they created the Articles of the Confederation, (The confederation being the original 13 colonies) this was essentially the rough draft for the Constitution and was ratified in 1781. Since the Articles were weak it was only used to decide final decisions among the states, make treaties-alliances, and to create currency. Many opposed the articles, many were farmers whose land had been taken away and ultimately led to

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

The debated decision would take more than a few favored votes in signing a written document. The Articles of Confederation, being used to unite the new born country after the war, were deemed unfortunately insufficient by the representatives of the thirteen colonies. During this time, the young government was composed of one house that served as the Congress, containing no leader and no court system. This new government had miniscule power over the states, who governed themselves. (3) Consequently, this led the representatives of the 13 states to make a journey to Philadelphia, the capital, where they began to scrutinize possible options, and this meeting would become known as the Constitutional Convention.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Afterwards, the President has to overview and sign the bill within 10 days, otherwise the bill becomes the law with a help of Congress during the session. The President can veto the bill and explain why, returning it back to Congress. The Congress can override the Presidential veto by two-thirds of the Senators and Representatives present in chambers. Finally, the bill becomes the law if it is signed by the President or if the Presidential veto is overridden by the

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

the preseint can sign the bill and it becomes law. the president can ignore the bill for ten days wile congress is in session and it becomes law. president can veto the bill. or president can ignored bill, congressional session ends, bill is pocket veto.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

The executive branch can check the laws congress wants to pass and can veto them if he disagrees. The Legislative branch can check the executive by accepting the already vetoed law and can impeach or fire the president out of office. The Justice Branch can make sure peoples rights and liberties are being followed and check if the laws follow the constitution's rules. In the text, it says “To further limit government power the framers provided for separation of powers the constitution separates the government into three branches Congress of the legislative branch makes the laws. The executive branch headed by the president carries out laws.

Read More

More about Confederation Vs Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document