More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors Affecting The Choice Of Leadership Styles
Comparison between leadership theories
Comparing and Contrasting Four Leadership Models or Theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When Connie’s mother entered their home, she noticed the misplacement of the telephone on the ground but did not think anything of it. “Connie, we are home!” she yelled from downstairs. There was no response. She went upstairs to check on Connie and noticed her absence.
Q2: What Contingency Theory (pages 337-341) of leadership allies to this Leader? Examine and apply the two theories of Charismatic and Transformational Leadership to this Leader. Determine the level of authenticity, ethical and trustworthy behavior of this Leader (pages 349-355).
The study of leadership is not something new, leadership theories have been the source of numerous studies. Many have tried to define what allows authentic leaders to stand apart from the followers, the wants following what the leader said. There as many theories on leadership as there are philosophers, researchers and professors that have studied and ultimately published their leadership theory. Theories are commonly categorized by which aspect is believed to define the leader the most. According with the article from Leadership-Central.com the most widespread one's are: Great Man Theory - “The Great Man theory assumes that the traits of leadership are intrinsic.
Daniel Goleman’s article: Leadership that gets results, is from the Harvard Business School archives. Daniel Goleman is the noted author of the book Emotional Intelligence. He thus combines his findings in emotional intelligence with research on leadership styles done by Hay/McBer. The research displays 6 leadership styles. The author does not conclude that there is one best style, on the other hand stating that the best leaders practice each of these styles or at least a number of these styles multiple times in each week.
Contingency Theories of Leadership Within the movie, some of the characters show qualities of leadership that can change depending on the situation and the environment. Especially notable, the whole aspect of Inception is its emphasis on the dream world in the environment of one’s subconscious. A theory that is expressed throughout the situations in the movie is the Path-Goal theory. This theory is described to possess a leader who helps their followers by removing obstacles for them and giving them the best route to opportunity.
They refer to Fielder’s contingency theory, path-goal theory, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership theory, and Vroom and Yetton’s normative decision model. Each theory is distinctive and different from each other. In the case of McDonald’s, it practices each theory to a certain degree. Fieldler’s contingency theory states that in order to maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation (Williams, 2007).
The leader will use different powers kept the follows on topic and engage to the goal. The leader/follower situation framework contains the elements: leader, follower, and situation. The framework lays out a way for leaders to learn their role because the leader need to gain power and hold
Contingency theories put forth the idea that the success of a leader hinges on the specific situation at hand. A situation can be proven effective based on the leader or the leadership style attached. The factors that would determine this would include the task, the personality of the leader and the composition of the group that is meant to be led. Its basic assumption is that leadership-success or failure – is situational. There are a number of sub-theories that fall under the general contingency umbrella.
Through self-reflection and academic readings, I have discovered that I identify with three different leadership theories. During the first meeting in a Strength Based Leadership class, we were asked to write our leadership history. The class then began an ongoing exploration of various leadership theories. Upon reviewing my leadership history from the first class and synthesizing the information from the theories that were examined, I discovered that I most resonate with the Trait Leadership Theory, the Skills Leadership Theory, and the Path-Goal Leadership theory. These theories are leader focused, describing the process and techniques a leader uses to accomplish goals.
Summarize Leadership theory Paradigms The leadership theory paradigm is an explanation of different types of leadership theory it helps to predict and control successful leadership through perceiving, studying, researching, and understand leadership. It includes following theories, trait theory, behavioral leadership theory, contingency leadership theory integrative leadership theory and the management to the leadership theory. Leadership trait theory is based on attempt to explain a distinctive characteristic of leadership effectiveness.
According to the book, "individuals who exhibit traits as a leader able to recognize someone who is a leader of leaders does not mean they managed to get each group to achieve its goals. " theories of leadership behaviour suggests that certain people are able to distinguish the behaviour of a leader by himself and not from
" Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behavior of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action." - Chester Barnard Max Weber 's Theory: Types of Leadership In Max Weber 's theory, he wrote about three types of leaderships: Bureaucratic, Charismatic, and Traditional. Weber was one of the first of the theorists to recognize that leadership itself was situational in nature, and that effective individuals needed to move dynamically from one type of leadership style to another to remain successful. 1] Bureaucratic Leadership "Bureaucratic administration means fundamentally domination through knowledge." Bureaucratic leadership is based upon fixed official duties under a hierarchy of authority, applying a system of rules for management and decision-making.
According to Bauer and Erdogan (2010), we have Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, Situational Leadership, Path-Goal Theory of Leadership, and Vroom and Yetton’s Normative Decision Model. I will explain three of these theories one-by-one, then discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and then analyze how each fits with my personality traits and leadership method. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory is based upon the LPC scale of a person also known as the Least Preferred Coworker (Bauer & Erdogan, 2010). If you have a high LPC, that means you still think well of even the worst coworker you could imagine. If you have a low LPC, it means that you think that the coworker you would hate would also be a bad person.
The theory is also popularly used because gives the leader the capacity to develop a high self-esteem and self-confidence. When a leader has developed these skills, the leader is therefore capable of influencing others while trying to handle different situations in different times. In addition, self-confidence gives
Out of those, leadership styles and contingency theories dominate the current literature on leadership. There are two major studies on leadership styles
