ipl-logo

Course Paper 1 The Problem Of Evil And Theodicy

1481 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Conclusion for the problem of evil

Course Paper Option 1: The problem of evil & theodicy
God is gracious. To say that God is gracious means God desires good and wants humanity to flourish. God’s justice is the claim that God is fair. The problem of evil makes it hard to defend God’s graciousness and justice. The problem of evil questions if God is all-good, all-powerful, and all-knowing then why does evil exist? Theodicy is the attempt to defend God’s omnibenevolence while evil exists (Hanneken, 2.3.1).
Evil is the absence of good. Evil and suffering are very similar, however, suffering can occasionally be good (Scherschligt). Suffering can occasionally be good because after we suffer, we can flourish. Hanneken’s first and second biblical solutions represent how suffering can …show more content…

Humans have free will to choose between good and evil, when they fail to choose good, they sin. God does not want humans to sin, but when they do, God punishes humans so they will repent (Hanneken, 2.3.2). Hanneken explains that God's justice "works for communities as a whole over the long course of history"(Hanneken, 2.3.2). God punishes societies as a whole over time through broad punishments such as plague and famine (Hanneken, 2.3.2). Natural evils are evils that happen naturally such as natural disasters. Plague and famine are natural disasters, as well as examples of God’s broad punishments for sin. God’s punishments are examples of natural evil because God’s broad punishments are natural disasters. Moreover, natural evil is God’s punishment for human sin.
There are three classical attributes of God. God is all-good, all-powerful, and all-knowing. The problem of evil questions: if God is all-good, all-powerful, and all-knowing then how can evil exist? Secondly, the problem of evil questions God’s graciousness, if God desires good and wants humanity to flourish then why does humanity suffer and not …show more content…

Can we still say that God is fair if evil exists? Ultimately, this brings up the question: “Why do bad things happen to good people and good things happen to bad people?” God is fair, good people who suffer short term will flourish in the long run, while bad people who flourish short term will suffer in the long run (Hanneken, 2.3.3). Hanneken’s second biblical solution: “God prospers the righteous in the long run” is the best defense of God’s justice (Hanneken, 2.3.3). This solution states that hard-working righteous people will prosper in the long run, while lazy evil people will fail (Hanneken, 2.3.3). Moreover, the bad things that happen to good people is temporary, they will prosper in the long run. On the contrary, the good things that happen to bad people are temporary, and they will fail in the long run (Hanneken, 2.3.3). That being said, everyone gets what they deserve, good people will be rewarded in the long run, whereas bad people will be punished in the long run (Hanneken, 2.3.3). Furthermore, the problem of evil does not disprove God’s justice because God remains fair by rewarding good people in the long run and punishing bad people in the long

Show More
Related
921 Words | 4 Pages

Some people may argue that it is not fair for God to compensate for evil in the afterlife, when the people who suffer have already experienced the evil in this life. Effingham, Nikk. “Using Wormholes to Solve the Problem of Evil.” TheoLogica, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The problem of evil philosophy has been a long debated topic. The idea that God is almighty, God is perfectly good, and evil exists has many different sides, which sparks many different explanations. During Candide, Voltaire addresses the topic with multiple examples applying to both moral and natural evils. However, the problem of evil to me is not as simple as one answer. I believe that there needs to be a certain extent of evil to bring out good and that is why God created it.

Read More
1395 Words | 6 Pages

Ward states that doing “good” includes more than pleasure. It includes moral obligations and objective intrinsic values to do right by others and ensure pleasure for oneself. With an omnipotent and omniscient being like the monotheistic God, Ward argues that these values and obligations would be grounded within God. Thus, an "evil God would have to

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, how can humans treat each other as though another human is just a bug that needs to be exterminated? Through the shocking stories, the reader also begins to question where God is; however, there needs to be a separation of blame. Human’s evil actions are not the responsibility of God. It must be recognized that humans have freewill to choose to do good or evil. Evil is of the world, but since God is not of the world, God is not responsible for the evil in the world.

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

“The Problem of Evil” by Peter van Inwagen, is a series of lectures that that presents van Inwagen’s various responses to problem of evil. In this essay, I will present “the local problem of evil” (from chapter 6 of the book), the solution van Inwagen proposes for this problem, and my critique of his solution. “The local problem of evil,” according to van Inwagen, is the hypothetical response an atheist would have towards van Inwagen’s solution of “the global problem of evil” which is, “If god existed, then why is there so much evil in the world?” The argument of “the local problem of evil” is “If god existed then why are there specific horrors that occur in the world, like children dying in a horrific car crash?” The argument that is drawn

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

Evil is permitted as a test of the character of humanity and the faithfulness of evil’s victims. Salvation for them is enlightenment, is only granted by god’s grace. Suffering is

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Natural evil is evil that is not caused by human choice such as natural disasters and disease. Moral evil is caused by human choices and

Read More
2349 Words | 10 Pages

He also refers to the cosmological argument to show that God is an all-powerful being who created the universe out of nothing. Furthermore, he claims that suffering in the world is moral in the sense that suffering inflicted on innocents is genuinely evil. Without a God, there would be no objective morals, thus, evil proves God’s existence, as things would not be considered good or evil without a God (Craig, p. 126). In conclusion, evil proves God’s existence and thus the question as to why God permits evil does not work to disprove His existence.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

According to Isaiah 55:9, “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts” (ESV). It is impossible for people to comprehend the ways of God. Humans are limited by their brain’s ability to function, but God is not limited by anything and is able to do, think, or accomplish anything he wants. In conclusion, bad things happen to good and bad

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

Although God’s existence and the validity of the experiences that may imply God’s existence is still not known, it is enough to say that logically, evil can exist along with God and his properties, even in today’s

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

It is possible to have sunshine without shadows, but not the other way around. But why would an all-loving God not eliminate every evil? Using the same idea that God cannot logically do the impossible, such as create a square circle, we may also see that it is logically impossible to make someone freely do good. If he makes them, they cannot be free. And if they are free, he can’t make them.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Another main idea of Christianity is the problem of evil, how it came about, and how it hurts God’s people. The Bible gives many reasons as to why God would allow evil for a greater purpose, but it does not answer every question that

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).

Read More
1589 Words | 7 Pages

"London", by William Blake uncovers a city overwhelmed by neediness and hardship. Blake overshadows London’s elegant appeal and replaces it with his own twist of the corrupted city. London is nothing more than a city with a shortage of money due to harsh economic times. Those in power have weakened the moral of the while city so that poverty exists in the lower classes. Blake uses three distinct metaphors: “Marriage hearse,” “black’ning Church,” and “mind-forged manacles” to express that the city suffers from social tyranny, physical and psychological confinement, and widespread suffering and despair society.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout Harper’s book and Kheiyn’s article, I found five main points that stood out to me in relating to helping me understand why bad things happen to good people. First, God did not create pain and suffering, man has through sin and defiance. Second, although suffering is not good, God uses it to achieve good. The third point tells us that the day will come where your misery will no longer exist and God will judge evil. The fourth states that our suffering does not even compare to what God has in store for his followers.

Read More

More about Course Paper 1 The Problem Of Evil And Theodicy

Related Topics

Open Document