ipl-logo

Descartes Second Meditation

1487 Words6 Pages

Describe and assess the process by which Descartes arrives at the conclusion ‘I think therefore I am’.
In this essay, I will outline Descartes Meditations. Primarily, I will discuss the first meditation and analyse the second Meditation. Chiefly, I will analyse the second Meditation, by which Descartes concludes “I think there for I am”. Significantly, Descartes is a famous seventeenth century philosopher, renowned for saying “I think therefore I am”. Notably, Descartes was a rationalist, relying on reason as the best guide for belief and action. Descartes trusted the human power of logic. In addition, Descartes had immense interest in clarity of thought and definition and what could achieve. Furthermore, the goal of Descartes meditation …show more content…

The first Meditation can be read as setting the groundwork for the meditations that follow. The intention of the first Meditation is to present the idea that our senses are flawed and should not be trusted. Descartes has three main arguments in his first Meditation, the dream argument, the deceiving God argument and the evil demon or “evil genius” argument. Reading the first Meditation Descartes first meditation entitled “What can be called into doubt”, begins with the Meditator reflecting on the number of falsehood, he has believed during his life and the subsequent faultiness of knowledge he had built up as a result of these falsehoods. Significantly, Descartes wishes to resolve himself of the knowledge he knows and begin again from the foundations. Ultimately, the Meditator reveals he has may only find reason to doubt his present mindset in order to prompt a more sturdier foundation for his knowledge. Everything that the Meditator has accepted as true has come from or through his use of his senses. However, the Meditator acknowledge that’s the sense can deceitful. The …show more content…

Descartes aspires to bring his readers to an understanding of their essential natures. The meditational exercise is to reveal the Meditators capacities, the ability to avoid error and discover the truth. The second Meditation, subtitled, ‘The nature of the human mind and it is better than the body’ took place the day after the first meditation. The Mediator is determined in his resolve to continue his pursuit for certainty and discord anything that is open to doubt. Descartes begins the meditation by noting that Archimedes required one fixed point of reference to move the globe from one place to another. Significantly, Descartes aspires to find one thing that is indubitable and certain. However, Descartes remarks that everything he experiences is false. He notes that the body and internal nature with their mathematical truths may be fictional. Notably, the only truth is he believes is that nothing is certain. The only truth is that there is no absolute truth. Descartes poses a question, “what about myself?” He notes that there may be no world and no body belonging to him, however, he does not consider himself nothing. Descartes continues with the question ‘where I will be and who will I become?’ if the world is non-existent. Descartes concedes that he must exist. In order for Descartes to endure such doubts about the

Show More
Related
723 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes finishes up this Meditation with some more ethics about the self. Information of the self, or psyche, is more particular and sure than knowledge of the body. The technique for uncertainty in the First Meditation seemed to debilitate all information, yet in the Second Meditation Descartes discovers something that cannot be questioned. I think each of us must affirm our own particular presence and set up the means of our own

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

Art Spiegelman's Maus and Elie Wiesel's Night are two novels that show the experience of being a holocaust survivor. Regardless, the two books differ in their narrative style while still keeping the similarities in the themes. The following essay will show the differences between the two texts in their narrative style, the portrayal of the main character's relationships, and the impact of the book on the reader. First off, Maus and Night are considerably different in the way that they use their narrative style. Maus is a graphic novel that uses images to convey the horrors of the holocaust while Night is traditional and uses the same novel format to relay the same horrors.

Read More
1656 Words | 7 Pages

Juliet Arowosaye UCOR 132: Basic Philosophical Questions Meditations on First Philosophy; Descartes’ Doubts and Resolutions In Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes, the meditator presents the possibility that everything he, and all humans, have known and seen could be false. He struggles to find any reason to not doubt that our senses have just been deceiving us our whole lives. Thus, he reaches the conclusion that everything we have seen and known, as well as our existence, must be called into doubt. Descartes attempts to unravel the meditator’s mentality by presenting ways in which we are possibly being deceived.

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

However, Descartes is indeed certain of the fact that he is a thinking being, and that he exists. As a result of this argument, Descartes makes a conclusion that the things he perceives clearly and distinctly cannot be false, and are therefore true (Blanchette). This clear and distinct perception is an important component to the argument that Descartes makes in his fifth meditation for the existence of God. This paper explains Descartes ' proof of God 's existence from Descartes ' fifth meditation, Pierre Gassendi 's objection to this proof, and then offers the paper 's author 's opinion on both the proof and objection.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

In Meditations, Descartes formulates the framework and guidelines of his First Philosophy or metaphysics, where methodic doubt is used to discern the nature of being and the world. Here he describes how we can derive a reliable method that can definitively determine what is

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Having asserted with absolute certainty his existence, Descartes attempted to remove the basis for doubting, a deceiving God, by first classifying in the Third Meditation which category of thoughts would be susceptible to doubt. Descartes divided thoughts into three categories: imagery, volitions and judgments, of which the third category could be most erroneous since judgment could lead to false ideas, a problem which could be resolved by considering them different modes of thoughts. These ideas could be further divided into three categories - innate, produced by one or adventitious. The last category was of particular importance: in term of representation, these ideas conveyed different degree of objective reality with omnipotent deities

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes completes this chapter determining that perceiving is not possible without a mind, the mind’s existence is definite, and most importantly the mind and body are two separate and distinct

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Renes Descartes is a very well known arm chair philosopher who was not content with the idea that everything he was told had to be accepted. Descartes believed that everything he told was to be accepted, until he began to doubt things. In Meditation I, he doubts just about everything; including his trustworthiness of his senses. In Meditation II, Descartes finds a belief that he does not doubt that is that he is a thinking thing. Through Descartes Dream Argument in Meditation I he doubts his senses.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Meditation is the introspective process that involves the mind turning back in and upon itself, removing itself from the material world and focusing its attention inward. Descartes employs meditation to detach the minds from external influences, to think and analyze philosophy from the original foundations. This brings us to Descartes First Meditation, with the introduction of the method of doubt, he presents his philosophical project and claims that in order to complete his project he needs to question the truth behind all his beliefs. He attempts to accomplish this impossible feat because as he’s aged he has realized the false foundations that he has held onto thus far and the ideas he’s built on them. To be able to tear down these beliefs,

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Through the reading of his three meditations on first philosophy, it is easy to see how many of his thoughts raise the skeptic’s eyebrow in rebuttal. Especially, in his second mediation, by trying to prove his own existence, Descartes causes one of the biggest controversies in his career. Through the relationship between

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes’ project –the Meditations- was undertaken to provide answers, as opposed to uncertainties. He aimed to establish which of our previous beliefs we can retain and which we should reject as unjustified. During his search for complete truths, Descartes concludes that God exists, primarily because this idea is already within us. God’s existence is crucial in Descartes’ argument because without establishing that God exists, the Meditator (symbolic of not only Descartes but of anyone reading the Meditations and repeating his exercise) cannot be certain of anything bar that he is a “thinking thing” (Descartes, 1998, p.31). Descartes also uses God’s existence to prove there is no deceiver, as God would not allow this (Descartes, 1998, p.44).

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

The First Meditation is a exercises in learning to doubt everything that one believes at three different levels. Descartes notes that nothing is always as they seem at first glance and then notes to never trust in the truth of what we perceive (Perceptual Illusion). Descartes raised a more systematic way to doubt the legitimacy of sensory perception. He claims that anything we perceive in the physical world is nothing more than a fabrication of our imagination (Dream Problem).

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

In the second meditation, Descartes uses this cogito of consciousness and existence to assume that the mind is distant from a body. “I am, I exist”. This essay I will clearly discuss an outline of Descartes cogito in the second meditation and how it deals with the subject of existence and also Descartes’s strongest and weakest arguments in this case. “The Meditation of yesterday filled my mind with so many doubts that it is no longer in my power to

Read More

More about Descartes Second Meditation

Related Topics

Open Document