Electoral College Argumentative Essay

Electoral College Argumentative The Electoral College was a compromise between the national and state governments in the United States back when the Constitution was still a new governmental document. In its time the Electoral College served to make sure that the President was chosen by the most qualified people from each state. Nowadays things have changed, the Electoral College’s original purpose has been perverted into a tool used by politicians to win the presidency unfairly. The Electoral College is an outdated piece of legislation that favors votes from swing states rather than the popular vote and should be abolished.

Although some believe that the Electoral College is an integral part of our election system they would be shocked

This points to a severe sign that the Electoral College is being used by politicians to win the Presidency without actually being the people's candidate. For example, the 2016 election was the most recent election where this occurred. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by over 2.8 million votes. Despite this, Republican candidate Donald Trump won the presidency because he had received more electoral votes than Hillary had. Frustratingly, this is one of the most extreme examples of the Electoral College being used to win a Presidential election over the actual votes of the people. A country where a candidate can receive 2.8 million votes more than their opponent and still lose is inherently undemocratic. The legislation that allows for this to occur should be immediately abolished because it challenges the fundamental right to “One Person One

In fact, this is what the Electoral College was initially intended to be. It was made to be a compromise between the smaller states and the larger ones back when it was first written. In theory this wouldn’t be an incredibly bad idea, however in practice the Electoral College has been exploited. Malicious parties have used the Electoral College to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. While it is true that the Electoral College gives small states more power during the elections it takes away from other voters, for example look at Texas and Wyoming. Texas has a population of around 30 million people while Wyoming has closer to 500 thousand. According to the Electoral College Texas has around 40 electoral votes due to its population, Wyoming has 3. This seems good on paper, that is until you do the math for how many people each representative covers. A representative in Texas represents around 750 thousand people but a representative in Wyoming represents 166 thousand people. That means the individual voting power of someone in Texas is worth less than a vote from a citizen in Wyoming. This is clear grounds for the abolishment of the Electoral College as it goes against what the founding fathers initially wanted for the country, “All Men Created Equal” and