ipl-logo

Essay On Civil Disobedience

760 Words4 Pages

A law to all, is mandatory. A law to many, is controversial. A law to some, is optional. A law to few, is never going to be broken. Currently, people take the law into their own hands. Many people pick and choose what laws they believe should be followed, and what laws they believe should be broken. I strongly believe that civil disobedience positively impacts a society. Revisiting our history and honing in on a few individuals who broke the law and left positive marks on society and culture, prove peaceful law resistance does benefit a society. Through peaceful law and fighting for what is right, I am proud to live in NYC where we are leading in LGBT inclusion. On October 17, 2016, NYC received a perfect score for LGBT Inclusivity …show more content…

Her renowned story is learned by all in schools today. We all know her as the woman who refused to move to the back of the bus to allow a white person to sit in her seat, even though that was the law. She did not do this in an angry or violent manner. She simply did not move. Her civil disobedience led to the eventual change of rights and positively impacted society. Rosa Parks knew that. "You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right." Ms. Parks said this and it should stick with you. If the law was correct and morally right, then she would have followed …show more content…

This may sound detrimental to most, but really it did no harm. Snowden did not release any vital plans or methods of America. Snowden did release information to the general public which violates our privacy rights. He leaked that the N.S.A is monitoring nearly everyones phone calls, internet, and social medias. Snowden broke his jobs code by sharing this information, but he was just doing the right thing. Just like Americans have the right to know that their calls are being monitored even if they are not a suspect or a threat to the US. Edward did not break this law with cruel and ugly intentions. He did this for the greater good to aid and asset

Show More
Related
152 Words | 1 Pages

Based on the principles of rights ethics, individuals have certain privileged rights and one of them is privacy and protection against invasion of personal rights and property. Individual rights can be moral, legal or ethical in nature and have to be respected by everyone, be it the person next door or the government. Thus, NSA’s interference into the personal lives of U.S citizens and foreign nationals, by collecting data without their knowledge, is nowhere near ethical or moral. If they had to do so based on so called reasons of “national security”, NSA should have disclosed their actions to the public and justified their mode of operation. Overall, national security is important so safeguard the nation, but at the same time, individual

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

In June, the Guardian revealed that “the NSA claimed to have "direct access" through the Prism program to the systems of many major internet companies, including Microsoft, Skype, Apple, Google, Facebook and Yahoo. Blanket orders from the secret surveillance court allow these communications to be collected without an individual warrant if the NSA operative has a 51% belief that the target is not a US citizen and is not on US soil at the time. Targeting US citizens does require an individual warrant, but the NSA is able to collect Americans' communications without a warrant if the target is a foreign national located overseas.” ( Page 2 & 3, Glenn Greenwald) When it come to your own personal information it’s you personal freedom to have your

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Rosa Parks was living in a time of cruelty to those who weren’t the average white person. You couldn’t do anything about your situation and had to learn how to survive by yourself. In those times of fear, she continued to live her unfair life and started to stand up to

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” This is not for our safety anymore, it about gaining control of the people. Before Edward Snowden released the classified documents there was no proof that the NSA has been spying on its people, Snowden's goal was to let the people know about their governments activities not to betray the NSA but to correct their errors made. Elected representives that continually fed the nation empty promises, are the same ones that would demand Edawrd Snowden be

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

In this video, racial segregation was displayed when black people were forced to sit in the back of the bus, while white people had the front. If there were no more open spots, African Americans were required by law to give up their seat to a white person. On December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks got arrested for disobeying this law. When she asked why she had to do this, the officer relied, “The law is the law.” Laws were being followed by both races for many years, until people decided that racial segregation is

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

As news of this caliber tends to, the disclosure ignited controversy over whether Snowden was justified in his whistleblowing. Edward Snowden was completely justified in the information he released; the actions of the government were unconstitutional and deserved to be exposed. Snowden started his path to being one of America’s most infamous whistleblowers as a security guard at the University of

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

Rosa Parks was a very well known civil rights activist. She is best known for boycotting the Montgomery, Alabama, bus system for trying to make her get up and out of her seat because it was labeled “white”. (Rosa Parks 2)This was helped led by Martin Luther King Jr. who was asked to be the president of the Boycott. On December 5, Parks was found guilty of violating segregation laws, given a suspended sentence and fined $10 plus $4 in court costs. When Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat in 1955, it wasn’t the first time she’d fought with this driver.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

One of the first documents to be published by the guardian was a court order showing that the NSA was collecting the phone records of millions of the United States customers of Verizon. That order was the main talk of debates. Even though that Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed with Snowden she had to protect the dignity of the NSA and stated “This is not surveillance, it does not collect any context of any communication”. Though we all know that is not

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

His opponents claim that he “threw the secrets he knew up in the air” in an act that was more for his ego than conscience, and hoped that it would have positive effects. There are also people who are in support of Edward Snowden and believe that in revealing just how much the government had been spying on Americans and others, he has performed a “public service” that by far outweighs any breaching if trust he may have committed (Cassidy). His supporters counter the argument of his actions being dangerous, by claiming that the information he put out didn’t reveal anything about the algorithms that the N.S.A. uses, the groups and individuals targeted, or the identity of U.S. agents. Furthermore, no content of U,S. military plans and conversations between U.S. or foreign officials was revealed.

Read More
2180 Words | 9 Pages

“The language of rights now dominate political debate,” begins Ronald Dworkin’s paper “A Special Supplement: Taking Rights Seriously” (Dworkin 1). Such a sentiment still rings true today, with discussions regarding what should constitute protected speech being especially prominent. Historically, other rights have been debated as well, such as the right to participate in civil disobedience. Civil disobedience was prominent during the civil rights movement, with the most famous advocate being Dr. Martin Luther King.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

The government controls everything around you, which ends up controlling you. With todays population, it has grown much more difficult to sustain a balanced and organized government. As the population number grows governments will fall, when governments fall, civil war breaks out, causing military to move to the streets. Just like in 1984, it all starts with a little something called thought crime. No one can control how someone thinks, which can lead to acts of defiance like we see very much today.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Disobedience has always been an integral part of progression in human society. Time and time again it has been shown that with disobedience comes freedom, happiness, and new positive ideas. Many protests throughout history have used disobedience to succeed. First of all, the words “disobedience” and “rebellion” go hand in hand, and here's why.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

In 1965 in southern United States, the ordeal of social issues was very prevalent in the lives of U.S. citizens. For the African Americans of this time, it’s hard to discern if slavery is was actually a thing of the past. Fifteen thousand people gathered to secure their right to suffrage and non discrimination, even though the right to vote is something that was “given” to them in the recent years. Their plan is to walk from Selma to Montgomery, a 54 mile walk. This group of people understand the risks they were taking by committing to an act of civil disobedience against the United States Government, but they were simply standing up for what is naturally just.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

“You must be the change you wish to see in the world” These astonishing words that Mahatma Gandhi said made me suppose that Civil Disobedience is a Moral Responsibility of a citizen because when breaking certain laws, a citizen perhaps incorporate a good intention or a bad intention for breaking it. Citizens break the law occasionally to have their beliefs be heard so change can be assemble. Some ways that Civil Disobedience can be a Moral Responsibility would be breaking the law for the right intentions. An example of breaking the law for the right intentions could be The Salt March that Gandhi Created or, Rosa Parks standing up for her beliefs about her actions, MLK wanting equal rights with caucasian. Illegal Immigrants coming into the

Read More

More about Essay On Civil Disobedience

Related Topics

Open Document