Imagine a world in which the internet is broken up into fast and slow lanes, that you must pay to access certain websites or pay to get more speed on sites. That is what FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wants to do. He wants to destroy net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that everything and everyone on the internet is treated the same and not to discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. This includes throttling websites unless you pay or outright blocking websites that the Internet Service Providers don’t want you to access such as services that rivals their own. Net neutrality will increase competitiveness which increases service and by abolishing net neutrality in the United States it effects businesses in …show more content…
These ISP’s have violated net neutrality principles in the past. Comcast was secretly throttling peer to peer services such as uTorrent or BitTorrent which Comcast continued to do until the FCC ordered them to stop. AT&T was also caught limiting access to FaceTime, so only those users who paid for AT&T's new shared data plans could access the application. There is also a myriad of examples of ISP’s violated net neutrality principles which further proves that the ISP’s want to control your data. If net neutrality laws are appealed, then that means that ISP’s can make you pay to use different websites. Social networking sites can cost a monthly fee while video content websites can cost a separate fee or even allow you on the sites for free but charge you to get into the “fast” lane. They can also block websites altogether and even force you to use their services. It is evident that the ISP’s will want to control what you have and have not got access to on the internet to make more