ipl-logo

Essay On Tariff Of Abominations

485 Words2 Pages

What is the Tariff of Abominations? The "Tariff of Abominations" was a protective tariff passed by the Congress of the United States on May 19, 1828, designed to protect industry in the northern United States. Enacted during the presidency of John Quincy Adams, it was labeled the Tariff of Abominations by its southern detractors because of the effects it had on the antebellum Southern economy. It set a 62% tax on most imported goods. Industries in the north of the United States were being driven out of business by low-priced imported goods, so the major goal of the tariff was to protect these industries by taxing those goods. The south was harmed by having to pay higher prices on goods the region did not produce. Reducing the exportation of British goods to the U.S. made it difficult for the British to pay for the cotton they …show more content…

The Nullification Crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–1837, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between South Carolina and the federal government. It ensued after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state. The United States suffered an economic downturn throughout the 1820s, and South Carolina was particularly affected. Many South Carolina politicians blamed the change in fortunes on the national tariff policy that developed after the War of 1812. The tariff was opposed in the South and parts of New England. By 1828, South Carolina state politics increasingly organized around the tariff issue. Its opponents expected that the election of Jackson as President would result in the tariff being significantly reduced. When the Jackson administration failed to take any actions to address their concerns, the most radical faction in the state began to advocate that the state itself declare the tariff null and void within South

Show More
Related
1081 Words | 5 Pages

The new tariff plagued the young nation by added fuel to growing sectional differences. States’ Rights Debate Andrew Jackson taking office in 1829 meant he had was forced to respond to the conflicts over tariffs, the core of dispute was questioning of an individual state’s right disregarding a law passing by the U.S Congress. Nullification Crisis Vice President John C. Calhoun’ s early political career supported a criteria of a strong central government, 1828 was when congress passed Tariff of Abominations, ands Calhoun joined fellow southerners in protests. Economic depression/ previous tariffs severely damaging economy of his home town South Carolina, recovering in 1828, some leader spoke of leaving Union over the issue of tariffs.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

However, this tariff would destroy any crop export profits, and, because the southern economy was agriculture-based, the so-called "Tariff of Abominations" infuriated Southerners. South Carolina, under the advice of vice president Calhoun (who was from South Carolina) threatened to nullify the tariff. This conflict between states ' rights and federal rule was ominous. Andrew Jackson, in response to this nullification, sent federal troops to South Carolina and ended any threat of nullification. The tariff was reduced to a more agreeable level in a compromise brokered by Henry

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson believed in asserting the power of the federal government. It became clear in the dispute that arose South Carolina and the issue of nullification in the year of 1832 to 1833. South Carolina acted out against the Tariff of 1828. They campaigned heavily against the tariff, justifying their arguments with the principles set out in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions written by Jefferson and Madison to support states’ rights. They supported their case by also arguing that the U.S. constitution allowed the states to individually nullify federal laws for the whole union.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

In 1828 and 1832, Andrew Jackson passed tariffs raising the cost to import goods to America. This was mainly to protect the fast-growing Northern economy. Many Southern states did not like that British goods were now more expensive because many relied on foreign trade in their livelihoods of farmers. In 1832 South Carolina published “South Carolina Exposition and Protest”. This was a document written by the Vice President.

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

South Carolina attempted to nullify the tariff through the theory of nullification, which states that the states have the right to nullify any law that is unconstitutional. Southerners claimed that the tariff was unconstitutional (as it only benefited the industrialized North), they claimed it was their right as a state to nullify the tariff and not have to pay for it. Thus, Southerners believed that the tariff should go away as a whole as they felt it went against what the founding fathers wrote in the Constitution. The North on the other hand loved the tariff, as it benefited them. They clung to Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1 of the Constitution, which said that Congress had the power to tax.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

The south opposed this because increasing the taxes on british imports made it difficult for Britain to pay for the cotton they imported from the south. This then related to the making of the cotton gin which led to controversy over slavery. This provided sectionalism over the tariff and why the north wasn’t as taxed as the

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

In the early 1830’s, South Carolina had the idea that they could nullify the law. This meant that the states could disregard some of the federal laws. A man named John C. Calhoun Promoted the idea. In 1828, there was a tariff passed that put a tax on all imports. Calhoun and a lot of Southern states were outraged.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

Andrew Jackson left his mark after serving his 8 year term as President. With his forceful personality and determination Jackson was best known for four trends: Nullification crisis, war against the National Bank, Territorial expansion and the Indian policy. South Carolina’s conflict with the government’s policy on protective tariffs was the consequence of the Nullification Crisis (1832-1833). Signed into law by Jackson this protective tariff was to uphold American manufacturing which promoted ‘good economic health’ in the Northern states more so than the Southern states. South Carolina claimed the tariff as unconstitutional and passed an Ordinance of Nullification.

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

Calhoun’s Ordinance of Nullification was not an ingenious idea. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson already adopted ordinance of nullification when they were against to Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 and 1799. Even though this precedent, Calhoun had considerable difficulty in bring support for the nullification. Congress passed tariff of 1832 which was another tariff that southerners saw as favoring for northern industries. And this time, people who supported Nullification win as, “An act in alteration of the several acts imposing duties on imports, approved on the nineteenth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight and

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

In the nullification crisis, Jackson disagreed with South Carolina over their attempt to nullify federal tariffs. Instead of trying to work things out together, he decided to make things harder and worse instead of finding a peaceful resolution. Additionally, his decision to disband the Second Bank of the United States during the bank war caused economic instability. In the passage, “Jackson’s Handling of The Nullification Crisis”, it says, “South Carolina threatened to secede from the United States if the tariff law was not repealed. Jackson was furious with the Southerners, however he did not back down.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Tensions between Jackson and Calhoun grew very tense which started the Nullification Crisis. Calhoun along with the state of South Carolina fought Jackson over the national tax policy. Jackson fought back with the threats to remove South Carolina from the union. In result "Privately, however, Jackson supported the idea of compromise and allowed his political enemy Henry Clay to broker a solution with Calhoun. Congress passed a compromise bill that slowly lowered federal tariff rates.

Read More
2373 Words | 10 Pages

Such as the instances of the Cherokee Nation versus Georgia, where he choose not to enforce the Supreme Court’s ruling but then in the Nullification Crisis, used his federal power to force South Carolina to pay the import taxes. Although there were times when Andrew Jackson did have positive impacts, his terrible reputation overshadows his deeds because his let his emotions cloud his judgement. Bibliography "Andrew Jackson Shuts down Second Bank of the U.S." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web.

Read More
159 Words | 1 Pages

The Tariff of 1828 also known as the Tariff of Abominations was very unpopular amongst the Southern states. The Southern states had to pay increased prices on goods that were manufactured in Britain. Furthermore the south felt that the tariffs were only benefiting the Northern states, while they had to pay increased prices on cotton, fabric, and clothing. The Nullification theory that was proposed by Calhoun undermined the U.S. Constitution by trying to avoid a federal law. Calhoun felt that South Carolina did not have to follow federal laws when it was not to their best interest.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Not surprisingly, these taxes coupled along with the unequal tariffs greatly increased tensions with Southerners. After those tariffs were passed Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing unfair laws that specifically targeted them. They believed that individual states had the right to ignore or “nullify” any law that the Federal government passed.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

A tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods. It is placed on foreign producers, so it has no influence on the domestic producers. It helps the domestic producers. It increases the production of domestic producers and increases their revenue while decreasing the amount of foreign goods that join the market. The U.S. could potentially implement a tariff, which would result in a decrease of imported goods and raise the prices of sugar in the U.S..

Read More

More about Essay On Tariff Of Abominations

Related Topics

Open Document