ipl-logo

Ethics Of Social Research: Prior To Regulation 45 CFR 46

1016 Words5 Pages

Amanda Ward Professor Kelly Mason-Davis SOC 101: Sociology October 3, 2015 Ethics of Social Research Prior to Regulation 45 CFR 46, which was written to offer basic protections to human subjects involved in both biomedical and behavioral research conducted or supported by HHS ("Human Subjects Research (45 CFR 46)." hhs.gov), Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, performed an experiment. Milgram intended to measure how far his subjects would go in potentially harming another human being at the instruction of an authority-type figure. Experiments like Milgram’s quickly came under scrutiny for their unethical practices, and eventually regulations were put into place. The importance of these ethical standards should not be undervalued …show more content…

The actor playing the student was never actually being shocked, but he could be heard screaming and begging the teacher to stop ("Milgram Experiment." YouTube.com). Several subjects appeared to be under extreme emotional distress at the prospect of continuing the experiment and potentially causing a complete stranger harm. Some even expressed their desire to stop or to leave, and even though the authority-type figure never specifically told them they could not, the subjects clearly felt they were under an obligation to continue at the direction of the authoritative figure. Their thought process had already been impaired to a point where they felt that their rights and choices had been stripped from them. In this way, Milgram has not only deceived his subjects, but he has also inflicted both psychological and emotional …show more content…

Deception was completely necessary in his particular study because he needed his subjects to believe that they were causing harm in order to test his hypothesis. It is human nature to alter our behavior depending on where we are and who we are around. Our actions and the way we speak around our bosses, for example, would not likely match that of when we are around our friends. It is highly probable that the subject of a study is going to carefully choose how they behave in certain situations when they know they are being observed, therefore the informed consent rule can sometimes become a hindrance for the researcher who is looking for raw and uncompromised data. Experiments like Milgram’s are incredibly valuable in offering an honest depiction of how humans behave when put in certain situations without the knowledge that they are under

Show More
Related
3240 Words | 13 Pages

Ethical Research Frances Jeffcoat HSC: 320 2 December 2014   Abstract This paper explores the history and ethics of research. This paper will look at two different types of research that are commonly used today. The focus of the research is clinical and basic science. Clinical science is the use of humans in an experiment or study to further knowledge about a particular aspect.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

The learner was out of sight, and not on the subject’s mind. The subject was going through the motions and doing what he was told by the experimenter because he was under the impression the experimenter knew what he was saying and no danger would come to the learner. In the Milgram Experiment, I have a few reasons why some people continued. First, I believe that the subject believed that no real danger was going to come to the learner.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

Next we have social psychologist, Stanley Milgram. The psychologist wanted to learn what it would take to have everyday individuales cause another individual harm, just because they were asked to. He proposed this experiment right after WWII to test if Germans were aimlessly following Hitler. The subjects of said experiment were told that they were giving a painful situation to a stranger they thought had answered wrongly in some sort of learning training. The main idea of this experiment was to broadcast the harm people would deliver when instructed to do so, as it says in the text.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

He saw that the more personal, or close, the real participant had to be to the fake one, while they were being shocked, affected the obedience as well. He also noticed that if there were two other fake participants teaching that refused to shock their learners that the real participant would not comply. Finally, he tested the experimenter telling the real patient to shock the learner by telephone, instead of actually being there in person, reduced obedience as well (McLead). The Milgram experiment and the Nuremburg trials can relate extensively to explain how the Holocaust happened the way it did.

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

The learner would be the person receiving electroshock from a machine ranging from 15 to 450 volts of electricity. The teacher was the person administering the dosage of electricity to the learner every time he would answer a question wrong. The test was rigged so that the learner would answer

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

In the Milgram Experiment, Milgram focuses on the effects of authority, or legitimate power. The participants of the experiment are given roles as “teachers” and the choice to opt out anytime, but they seem to forget this when Mr. Williams, the experimenter and the supposed figure of authority, orders them to continue when they refuse to persist administering shocks to the “learner”. He politely starts off with, “Please continue.” When the teacher insistently protests, he uses a stronger statement, such as, “You have no other choice but to continue.” This tricks the teacher into thinking that he or she does not have another option, and they reluctantly continue the experiment thinking that they could have possibly killed a human being.

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

Considering the findings of the Milgram’s experience I do not think the scientific community overreacted. There are guidelines to doing scientific experiments, and one is if the experimented is in any danger the test could be canceled. As I was learning about the Milgram’s research I felt a little uncomfortable, just knowing that the “teachers” are shocking people who answer wrong. Nonetheless, to find out the “learners” were actors it eased my mind.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

In Milgram’s first set of experiments, 65% of participants continued the experiments till 450-volt shock. All participants administered shocks of at least 300V. The result of Milgram’s experiment evokes the whole world and the experiment has been replicated in many different countries over the world. As the experiment was unethical, the original Milgram’s experiment was forbidden. But after 50 years, Burger (2009) proposed the similar experiment with ethical considerations to examine the level of obedience of participants.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at the University of Yale devised a study that tested people obedience. He conducted a blind study to test a person’s obedience to an authority figure, having a participant deliver out a shock to the other participants if they answered incorrectly, would they ignore their own moral conscience and do as they are told or would they stay true to their beliefs and refuse. At the end of the study what he discovered was disturbing, more than half of the participants were willing to abandon their beliefs ignoring their moral conscience to satisfy the authority figure. A lot of the participants alleviated themselves of all responsibility for their actions by placing blame on the other participant saying that it was not their fault that they were being punished or placing blame on the authority figure saying they were just following orders. When the participants were told the true nature of the study most felt horrible and disgusted

Read More
1907 Words | 8 Pages

The highest voltage was 450 volts. 65% of the people would go to that voltage. Most of the Milgram project was not to ethical standards. This experiment made people think that they were hurting someone with electric shock. This experiment also made people who went to the highest shock sometimes believe that they killed the person in the other room because the person in the other room getting shocked would go quiet as if he was dead.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

For every pair that is incorrectly matched the voltage will go up, going all the way up to 450-volt shock. Also each time that the teacher is going to administer a shock they have to iterate the voltage amount. When the experiment begins nothing eventful occurs because the voltage levels are low. As the voltage starts going up we start to hear the learner making noises (uhg), initially the participant does not react. After it happens again we see the participant ask a question regarding the noise, but continues when instructed.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

Within the Milgram stories, the experimenter ordered “lecturers” to give shocks to a “learner” for incorrect answers. Torn between obeying the experimenter and responding to the learner’s pleas, the persons normally chose to obey orders, despite the fact that it supposedly supposed harming the learner. Obedience was once very best when the individual giving the orders was once close at hand and was perceived to be a legitimate authority, when the authority figure used to be supported by a prestigious college, when the sufferer used to be depersonalized or at a distance, and when there were no position units for defiance. The experiments exhibit that social influences can also be robust enough to make persons conform to falsehoods or capitulate

Read More
250 Words | 1 Pages

(2009) and Fridlund et al. (2012) respectively. However, these hypotheses have gained much traction in the wider psychological community despite Powell, Digdon, Harris and Smithson (in press) theorizing a much more compelling candidate, Albert Barger. Ethics in psychology is a contemporary consideration and this fresh perspective has dictated a popular practice of re-examining the ethics of historical experiments with superfluous criticism. It is plausible that the outrage over possible unethical practice has distracted from the more parsimonious option presented by Powell et al.

Read More

More about Ethics Of Social Research: Prior To Regulation 45 CFR 46

Related Topics

Open Document