ipl-logo

European Treaties Vs First Nations Essay

642 Words3 Pages

First Nations and European approaches in regards to historical events have differed in most cases. The Europeans have approached many events with policy in mind where as the First Nations people viewed many events with a spiritual lens. In regards to the treaties, First Nations people viewed them as a spiritual process and a sacred act. The treaties were supposed to be formed for both parties benefit. It is shown that the European people did what they could to ensure the First Nations lost more than they gained. The European people were after the land of First Nations people and in return offered fishing and hunting rights, education and much more.

The treaties were a means of obtaining more land in the governments favor from the First Nations. “In instructing the first Treaty Commissioner Weymss Simpson, Joseph Howe noted that “It should therefore be your endeavor to secure the cession of the lands upon terms as favorable as possible to the government, …show more content…

With the first treaties, there was a language barrier and this caused some miscommunication; however, there was a treaty revision in treaties one and two. “After much dispute, and after the discovery of notes regarding additional “outside promises,” Alexander Morris prepared a “Revision of Treaties One and Two” in 1875 that formally recognized some of those promises, including agricultural assistance” (Stonechild, 2017). Later on however, the Europeans felt resistance from the First Nations people as they felt they were being lied to or misled. The First Nations people sought new ways of negotiating treaties and decided to push back. They were refusing to be taken advantage of. “Treaty Number Six generated more controversy than Morris had anticipated. He had not expected the Cree to block survey crews and telegraph lines. Saulteaux from Treaty Four tried to disrupt the proceedings and discourage the signing of Treaty Six” (Stonechild,

Show More
Related

How Did Joquips Acquire A Lie Of The Mohegan Indians?

1604 Words | 7 Pages

On October 9, 1806, Joseph Bird Joquips, a 70 year old Native Indian from the Mohegan Tribe, petitioned the State of Connecticut General Assembly for a portion of the land in Connecticut that was divided among Natives in the Mohegan tribe. He emphasized his devout military career that began in 1758 during the Seven Years’ War to convince members of the General Assembly to allot him a portion of land that belonged to the Mohegan Indians. While Joquips had already rightfully possessed a piece of the land because he had lived on it prior to European presence, the Europeans did not recognize his authority to the land; and thus, forcibly seized control of Native lands so that they could distribute it as they saw fit. It was not important for Joquips to possess a piece of land, but to have the Europeans recognize that the land belong to him. Thus, this petition represented Joquips manipulation of the European system to secure a piece of his tribe’s land with hopes to collect the land for the Mohegan tribe piece by piece.

Read More

Supplement Treaty With The Chippewa-Red Lake And Pembina Bands

1832 Words | 8 Pages

The translator was supposed to act neutral during the negotiations, but the translator did not have enough grasp of the Ojibwe language to translate thoroughly. After it was said and done, Alexander Ramsey boasted about buying each acre for only 5 cents from the Ojibwe tribe as it was the cheapest price ever per acre done through a land cession treaty. As said from Henry Whipple an advocate for Native Americans, "from beginning to end a fraud…"(Folwell). Not only did the Ojibwe tribe get swindled but the United States senate refused to ratify the treaty because it was to favorable to the indigenous people. The United States senate made significant changes throughout the Old Crossing Treaty.

Read More

Was Lord Dunmore Establish An Attack On Native Indians In North America?

1215 Words | 5 Pages

Don’t forget, these treaties were only an agreement. In March of 1775, The Wilderness Road project started and would eventually travel through a notch in the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Gap. This fundamentally changed travel through the

Read More

Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

413 Words | 2 Pages

In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

Read More

Gregory Ivan Dowd

471 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1992, book A Spirited Resistance: The North American Indian Struggle for Unity, 1745-1815 Gregory Evans Dowd takes an academic approach to Eastern Native American history. Dowd follows the same study identity and cultural transformations by focusing on two Eastern Native ideologies known as nativist and accommodationists. Elaborating on the outlooks, he argues that the monograph does not tell “history from the Indian point of view” and does not focus on a “single Indian outlook.” Advancing his argument the author states that his monograph provides historians with the many perspectives surrounding the Native American history in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds.

Read More

Indian Removal Act DBQ Essay

858 Words | 4 Pages

The statement, "We solemnly and earnestly protest against that false treaty," supports the author's argument that the Cherokee Nation was deceived and forced to move even further west. However, the strength or weakness of this source remains unclear as it is unclear whether the Cherokee Nation didn't understand the Treaty or if they were intentionally tricked into

Read More

Western Expansion And Its Effects On The Lives Of Native Americans

394 Words | 2 Pages

Before the 1860’s the native americans were living in peace until the Colonists attacked. The Western Expansion of 1860-90 greatly affected the lives of Native Americans, due to the powerful role

Read More

Cynthia Van Zandt Analysis

682 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.

Read More

Native Signatures Of Assent Summary

1123 Words | 5 Pages

X-Marks Native Signatures of Assent written by Scott Richards Lyons explores the history of the American Indians in the United States. Further, Lyons goes into depth about boarding schools, assimilation, treaties, broken promises, and tragic events that caused harm to millions of American Indians. In this paper, I will discuss how the White Europeans came to the United States and basically assimilated the tribes that were located here before the “discovery” of the Americas. Next, I will define the terms treaty and x-marks. Lastly, I will explain how unjust everything is, in particular when we talk about the rights, and properties that tribes had before the Europeans came to contact them.

Read More

Comparison Of George Washington And Indian Policy

915 Words | 4 Pages

After McGillivray was open to trade negotiations, the Treaty of New York was created. The treaty promised the protection of Creek Indian land boundaries against land seeking settlers and also assured them annual payments in money and trade goods (226). Although a treaty was created, neither side could keep their promise. McGillivray had also signed an agreement with the Spanish before he died because “the Creeks’ interests were best served by maintaining creative tension between the American and Spanish authorities” (226). The agreement that the United States had made in the Treaty of New York could not be kept as well as it had proved to be unrealistic.

Read More

What Effect Did The Government Have On The Plains Indians

481 Words | 2 Pages

One of those treaties was The Homestead Act, which means the white settlers can claim 160 acres of land for free as long as they stay to live on the land for five years and set up some resources. Most of the land that the white settlers were claiming was the Plains Indians land which was thousands of acres. Dawes Act is another act the government sets up into place. It was never to help families, but to wipe out the Plains Indians culture for

Read More

Indian Appropriation Acts Of 1851

1258 Words | 6 Pages

In history, there are conflicts and compromises. These are shown in many ways. Whether examining treaties, battles, or even speeches, there are many examples throughout time of groups having said conflicts and compromises. In this research paper, the writer will be concentrating on a certain area of history, Indian-U.S. relations. Prior to 1851 there had been many wars between the Americans and the Indians.

Read More

Black Death Dbq

986 Words | 4 Pages

“Owning land was extremely important to the European settlers … meant that a person had great wealth and political power”(VOA). On the other side, the native population, “believed that no one could own land … that anyone could use it … [and that if one] wanted to live on a piece of land and grow crops [one] could do so”(VOA). At the beginning when there were not that many colonizers the Native tribes were helping these Europeans and would share the land with them, but as tribes such as the Lenni Lenape began to see that more people were coming from another part of the world and started to take their lands, cut the trees and build roads and houses, the native tribes stated to see the true intentions of these

Read More

Treaty Of New Echota Essay

1115 Words | 5 Pages

The United States federal government tried to resolve its bond with many different Native tribes by treaties. The treaties were formal agreements between the United States government and the Native Americans. Treaties were made by the executive branch on behalf of the president and then ratified by the United States Senate. The treaties made it where Native American Indians would give up their rights to hunt and live on huge sections of land that they had inhabited in exchange for trade goods, houses, and assurances that no further demands would be made in the said treaties (NebraskaStudies. Org).

Read More

Sioux Tribe

900 Words | 4 Pages

The treaty stated that the indians had to allow travelers into the lands, allow government to establish roads, pay for wrongdoings of their people, and avoid conflict with other tribes, while the US government offered protection from US citizens and annuities if treaty of followed. However, issues with the treaty arose as Indians didn’t have full translation of the terms, an example of the government’s sovereignty ruling over ethics. In 1868, the treaty commision met again to improve the terms of the treaty. The US government established the Great Sioux Reservation where the indians could preside.

Read More

More about European Treaties Vs First Nations Essay

Related Topics

Open Document