Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Immanuel kant views on ethics
Kant's moral philosophy
Euthyphro dilemma solved
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Immanuel kant views on ethics
Kant's moral philosophy
Euthyphro dilemma solved
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Obedience is the process by which individuals comply with the instructions given by an authoritative figure. In terms of religion that “authoritative figure” would be a priest, pope, or any person in which they recite to you the teachings of God, Jesus, Allah, or the Divine. In reason to this everyone definition of what religion means to them is based off of the interpretations of the Holy Scriptures and Scared Texts that are usually taught to them by their religious leaders. In most societies that is how everything set up, but it leaves room for individuals to take whatever daily word that was taught and apply it to their daily lives. When other authoritative figures such as influential political leaders arise, they will twist the words of
Finally, Creon comes to the realization that his actions in the play led to the death of his son before he learns of Eurydice’s suicide. Creon first learns of his wife’s death in line 1408 of episode 5, when the messenger comments on his grief, mentioning “the rest, in the house”, the “rest” being the deceased Eurydice. However, before this point, in line 1393, Creon describes his prior actions, such as the sentencing of Antigone, as “crimes” that are “so senseless, so insane”. He describes them as such because they led to his son’s death, but he came to this realization before he learned of Eurydice’s suicide. Therefore, her death did not contribute to Creon’s epiphany in any way, and is irrelevant in this
Effects of Dehumanization in Night When the Nazi regime began to sweep across Europe, it was made apparent it was much too late. A similar revelation faced the European Jews, namely those living in Sighet, Hungary in 1944. Among the Jews caught by surprise is Elie Wiesel the author of the memoir Night. Wiesel includes the events of horror, torture, and dehumanization faced by prisoners in the concentration camps they are held in.
Obedience is compliance with an order/law or submission to someone’s authority. People often obey authority figures, even if it goes against their moral beliefs for several reasons: “Legitimacy” of authority: In any social, political or organizational environment, authority figures frequently occupy positions of responsibility and influence. the belief that these individuals have the right to decide or issue commands may cause people to obey them even when they don't agree. Socialization: People learn early on to listen to and obey parents, teachers, and law enforcement as examples of authoritative adults. The sense of duty and obligation to submit to authority is created by this socialization.
What is the most plausible view for a theist to take concerning the relations between God’s love and what is good, and between God’s commands and what is required? Theists wishing to defend theories of morality established in a theistic framework must respond to a plethora of objections. The problems regarding the relation between God and morality have been brought to light by a famous argument known as the Euthyphro Dilemma, named after a dialogue written by Plato. The version currently used against mono-theistic religions is a revision of the argument that originated in a poly-theistic religious context. The original argument was posed as a rhetorical question; "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it
HUM2225 Dr. Hotchkiss September 30, 2016 Moral Insight Plato’s Euthyphro is based on a lesson between Socrates and Euthyphro outside of the Athenian court about the definition of pious or impious. Euthyphro was surprised to see Socrates there and even more curious to find out why he was there. Socrates explained that the court was persecuting him for impiety because Meletus was spreading rumors about him corrupting the Athenian youth. Euthyphro explains to Socrates that he was there to prosecute his father for murdering a farm worker named Dionysus.
Thus, do we need God for moral incentive since without it we would not be moral? I would say yes and no. Because, there may be some individuals who would not be ethical/moral if they were persuaded that God does not exist. Yet, there are certainly numerous persuaded nonbelievers who still believe that it is significant to be ethical.
Obedience is when people listen to directions from an authority figure, often without questioning reasoning, While there are societal benefits to obedience, like people listening to directions from firefighters, lifeguards, and others who work to keep people safe, there are also potential negative impacts of the obedience modern society has managed to cultivate. For example, “Obedience is often at the heart of some of the worst of human behavior- massacres, atrocities, and even genocide” (Burger 4). These horrendous
b. Implications of the
'I was just following orders': Reviewing Milgram's Paradigm and the Underlying Causes of Obedience Susan Jaramani Psychology 288 American University of Beirut Abstract Fifty years after Milgram's famous Obedience to Authority Paradigm, a lot of studies are reexamining Milgram's findings, and finding gaps and discrepancies between the actual data and the published results. In this study I present the Milgram's Baseline Study, which drove the entire paradigm. I also present Milgram's "agentic state" explanation and provide its arguments that were based on footage evidence, reexamined at Yale. I also explain the situational features present when obedience is elicited, the motives behind doing those studies, and the positive and negative implications that obedience has. Having an inclusive understanding of obedience can be a breakthrough in countless aspects of our day to day lives by trying to do a positive social change.
“The Problem of Evil” is simply the question, why does God allow evil to happen? God is omnipotent, omniscient, all-loving, and rational, therefore why does evil exist? There is either no God or he is not what we think he is, since evil could be prevented by him with no risk. Atheists and anti-theodicist see a problem with the idea that God could prevent evil. They believe that because God is so powerful and perfect, that he would not allow such immoral actions to be done.
This theory also asserts that an act is immoral if it is prohibited or outlawed by the Creator. For an act to be moral is simple to follow God’s commandments. This theory could be a good standard of determining things whether it is right or wrong, the same as determining and guiding our actions towards goodness. But in the educational
We as people are not playing god. We have rules and laws
The Problem of Evil “Evil has no positive nature but the loss of good has received the name of evil” said St. Augustine. The problem comes from the fact that if there is a deity that is all good, all knowing and all powerful, how can evil exist? The problem of evil (or argument from evil) is the problem of reconciling the existence of the evil in the world with the existence of an omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful) and perfectly good God. The argument from evil is the atheistic argument that the existence of such evil cannot be reconciled with, and so disproves, the existence of such a God. Therefore, the “problem of evil” presents a significant issue.